Literature DB >> 19581136

Reconstruction of the buccal mucosa following release for submucous fibrosis using two radial forearm flaps from a single donor site.

Chung-Kan Tsao1, Fu-Chan Wei, Yang-Ming Chang, Ming-Huei Cheng, David Chwei-Chin Chuang, Huang-Kai Kao, Joseph H Dayan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Oral submucous fibrosis is a collagen disorder affecting the submucosal layer and can severely limit mouth opening. The use of bilateral forearm flaps to fill buccal defects following trismus release has proven to be effective and reliable. However, it requires the sacrifice of radial arteries from both forearms. We have developed a technique that allows for the harvest of two independent flaps from a single forearm donor site.
METHODS: Two separate flaps are designed on the same radial artery and concomitant vein pedicle. The distal flap is marked in the standard fashion and the proximal skin paddle is designed in the middle third of the forearm, based on septocutaneous branches of the radial artery. The two flaps are elevated and subsequently divided into two independent free flaps. Between June 2004 and June 2007, a total of 16 flaps were harvested from eight donor sites for buccal mucosa defects following trismus release. Improvements in mouth opening and buccal pliancy were evaluated by comparing preoperative and postoperative inter-incisal distance (IID) and maximal mouth capacity.
RESULTS: All flaps survived completely, and all donor sites were closed primarily, except for one. The mean flap size was 6.6x2.6cm (range: 6x2.5cm-7x3cm), mean pedicle length was 5.7cm, mean ischaemia time was 46min and mean total operating time was 8h 45min. At an average of 19.8 months follow-up, the inter-incisal distance averaged 29.13mm, an increase of 20.88mm compared with the preoperative measurement. The maximal mouth capacity averaged 55.63cc, an increase of 9.38cc compared with the preoperative measurement.
CONCLUSION: Two independent small flaps can be harvested safely from one radial forearm donor site. This approach is a useful option for reconstruction of bilateral buccal defects, particularly following submucous fibrosis release. The donor-site morbidity is minimal and limited to one forearm. Copyright 2009 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19581136     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.05.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  10 in total

Review 1.  Epithelial-mesenchymal interactions as a working concept for oral mucosa regeneration.

Authors:  Jiarong Liu; Jeremy J Mao; Lili Chen
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 2.  Surgical Interventions in Oral Submucous Fibrosis: A Systematic Analysis of the Literature.

Authors:  Venkatesh V Kamath
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2014-12-25

3.  Comparison of Extended Nasolabial Flap Versus Buccal Fat Pad Graft in the Surgical Management of Oral Submucous Fibrosis: A Prospective Pilot Study.

Authors:  Sandeep B Patil; D Durairaj; G Suresh Kumar; D Karthikeyan; D Pradeep
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2016-10-22

4.  Cross-Cheek Dumbbell-Shaped Radial Forearm Flap for Simultaneous Correction of Oral Cancer and Submucous Fibrosis.

Authors:  Shreya Bhattacharya; Sivakumar Vidhyadharan; Krishnakumar Thankappan; Subramania Iyer
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2015-11-05

Review 5.  Management of oral submucous fibrosis: an overview.

Authors:  Punnya V Angadi; Sanjay Rao
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-09

6.  Surgical defect coverage in oral submucous fibrosis patients with single-stage extended nasolabial flap.

Authors:  Faisal Idrees; Poornima Patel; Vilas Newaskar; Deepak Agrawal
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-09-24

Review 7.  What is the Optimal Reconstructive Option for Oral Submucous Fibrosis? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Buccal Pad of Fat Versus Conventional Nasolabial and Extended Nasolabial Flap Versus Platysma Myocutaneous Flap.

Authors:  Preeti Tiwari; Rathindra Nath Bera; Nishtha Chauhan
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-05-05

8.  Reduction of donor site morbidity of free radial forearm flaps: what level of evidence is available?

Authors:  Denys J Loeffelbein; Sammy Al-Benna; Lars Steinsträßer; Robin M Satanovskij; Nils H Rohleder; Thomas Mücke; Klaus-Dietrich Wolff; Marco R Kesting
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2012-02-03

9.  One plus one: Two free flaps from same donor thigh for simultaneous coverage of two different defects.

Authors:  Susmitha Bandi; Rayidi Venkata Koteswara Rao; Damalacheruvu Mukunda Reddy
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2016 May-Aug

10.  Bipaddled anterolateral thigh perforator flap for simultaneous reconstruction of bilateral buccal defects following oral cancer ablation or release of oral submucous fibrosis.

Authors:  Wei-Chen Chen; Chih-Hsuan Changchien; Yu-Min Su
Journal:  J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2016-09-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.