Literature DB >> 19580521

Stochastic modeling and simulation of the p53-MDM2/MDMX loop.

Xiaodong Cai1, Zhi-Min Yuan.   

Abstract

The p53 gene is crucial for effective tumor suppression in humans as supported by its universal inactivation in cancer cells either through mutations affecting the p53 locus directly or through aberration of its normal regulation. The p53 tumor repressor is regulated through a negative feedback loop involving its transcriptional target MDM2. MDMX is also an essential negative regulator of p53. Several computational models have been proposed to simulate the dynamics of the p53-MDM2 loop, but they do not include MDMX, only account for some basic interactions between p53 and MDM2 and cannot capture the intrinsic noise in the loop. In this article, we present a comprehensive model for the p53-MDM2/MDMX loop that accounts for most known interactions among p53, MDM2 and MDMX. Our model is characterized by a set of molecular reactions, which enables us to employ stochastic simulation to investigate the dynamics of the loop. In agreement with experiments, our results show that p53 and MDM2 undergo oscillations after DNA damage in the presence of noise, and the variation in oscillation amplitudes is much higher than that in oscillation periods. Our simulations predict that intrinsic noise contributes to 60%-70% of the total variation in oscillation amplitudes and periods. The protein levels of p53, MDM2, and MDMX after treatment with Nutlin in our simulations are also consistent with experimental results. Our simulation results further predict that p53 levels increase dramatically after MDM2 is knocked out, but increase with a much less amount after MDMX is knocked out. This may partially explain why MDM2-null and MDMX-null mouse embryos die in different developmental stages. Our stochastic model and simulation provide insights into the variability of the behavior of the p53 pathway and can be used to predict the dynamics of the pathway after certain interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19580521      PMCID: PMC3148126          DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2008.0231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Biol        ISSN: 1066-5277            Impact factor:   1.479


  83 in total

1.  Mutual dependence of MDM2 and MDMX in their functional inactivation of p53.

Authors:  Jijie Gu; Hidehiko Kawai; Linghu Nie; Hiroyuki Kitao; Dmitri Wiederschain; Aart G Jochemsen; John Parant; Guillermina Lozano; Zhi-Min Yuan
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-04-12       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Gene expression analyzed by high-resolution state array analysis and quantitative proteomics: response of yeast to mating pheromone.

Authors:  Vivian L MacKay; Xiaohong Li; Mark R Flory; Eileen Turcott; G Lynn Law; Kyle A Serikawa; X L Xu; Hookeun Lee; David R Goodlett; Ruedi Aebersold; Lue Ping Zhao; David R Morris
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2004-02-06       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Oscillatory expression of Hes1, p53, and NF-kappaB driven by transcriptional time delays.

Authors:  Nicholas A M Monk
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2003-08-19       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Accelerated MDM2 auto-degradation induced by DNA-damage kinases is required for p53 activation.

Authors:  Jayne M Stommel; Geoffrey M Wahl
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2004-03-18       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  Characterization of the 5' and 3' untranslated regions in murine mdm2 mRNAs.

Authors:  S M Mendrysa; M K McElwee; M E Perry
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2001-02-07       Impact factor: 3.688

6.  A plausible model for the digital response of p53 to DNA damage.

Authors:  Lan Ma; John Wagner; John Jeremy Rice; Wenwei Hu; Arnold J Levine; Gustavo A Stolovitzky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Solution structure of the tetrameric minimum transforming domain of p53.

Authors:  W Lee; T S Harvey; Y Yin; P Yau; D Litchfield; C H Arrowsmith
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  1994-12

8.  Rescue of embryonic lethality in Mdm2-deficient mice by absence of p53.

Authors:  S N Jones; A E Roe; L A Donehower; A Bradley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-11-09       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Human TAFII31 protein is a transcriptional coactivator of the p53 protein.

Authors:  H Lu; A J Levine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  The P53 pathway: what questions remain to be explored?

Authors:  A J Levine; W Hu; Z Feng
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 15.828

View more
  8 in total

1.  Harmonic oscillations in homeostatic controllers: Dynamics of the p53 regulatory system.

Authors:  Ingunn W Jolma; Xiao Yu Ni; Ludger Rensing; Peter Ruoff
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Mathematical model identifies effective P53 accumulation with target gene binding affinity in DNA damage response for cell fate decision.

Authors:  Tingzhe Sun; Dan Mu; Jun Cui
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 4.534

3.  Modeling the basal dynamics of p53 system.

Authors:  Tingzhe Sun; Weiwei Yang; Jing Liu; Pingping Shen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Noise amplification in human tumor suppression following gamma irradiation.

Authors:  Bo Liu; Shiwei Yan; Xingfa Gao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  An Algorithm for Finding the Singleton Attractors and Pre-Images in Strong-Inhibition Boolean Networks.

Authors:  Zhiwei He; Meng Zhan; Shuai Liu; Zebo Fang; Chenggui Yao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Transition and identification of pathological states in p53 dynamics for therapeutic intervention.

Authors:  Amit Jangid; Md Zubbair Malik; Ram Ramaswamy; R K Brojen Singh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  A Quantitative Systems Approach to Define Novel Effects of Tumour p53 Mutations on Binding Oncoprotein MDM2.

Authors:  Manuel Fuentes; Sanjeeva Srivastava; Angela M Gronenborn; Joshua LaBaer
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Stochastic and Deterministic Models of Cellular p53 Regulation.

Authors:  Gerald B Leenders; Jack A Tuszynski
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 6.244

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.