Literature DB >> 19580389

Momentary fluctuations in allocation of attention: cross-modal effects of visual task load on auditory discrimination.

Keren Haroush1, Shaul Hochstein, Leon Y Deouell.   

Abstract

Even when our attention is dedicated to an important task, background processes monitor the environment for significant events. The mismatch negativity (MMN) event-related potential is thought to reflect such a monitoring process. Nevertheless, there is continuing debate concerning the susceptibility of the MMN to attentional manipulation. We investigated the trial-by-trial relationship between brain activity related to change detection, reflected in the MMN, and visual psychophysical performance--while varying task difficulty. We find that auditory change detection is indeed "automatic" in that MMN remains robust despite increasing (visual) task load. However, the MMN amplitude and latency are susceptible to both visual load and to momentary attentional fluctuations as reflected in success or failure to identify a following visual target. We conclude that background central auditory processing is sensitive to the demands of a visual task, and fluctuates based on moment-to-moment allocation of attentional resources to the visual task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19580389     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  12 in total

1.  Cross-modal perceptual load: the impact of modality and individual differences.

Authors:  Rajwant Sandhu; Benjamin James Dyson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Pitch, Timbre and Intensity Interdependently Modulate Neural Responses to Salient Sounds.

Authors:  Emine Merve Kaya; Nicolas Huang; Mounya Elhilali
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Demand and modality of directed attention modulate "pre-attentive" sensory processes in schizophrenia patients and nonpsychiatric controls.

Authors:  Anthony J Rissling; Sung-Hyouk Park; Jared W Young; Michelle B Rissling; Catherine A Sugar; Joyce Sprock; Daniel J Mathias; Marlena Pela; Richard F Sharp; David L Braff; Gregory A Light
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  The advantage of ambiguity? Enhanced neural responses to multi-stable percepts correlate with the degree of perceived instability.

Authors:  Benjamin J Dyson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Sound segregation via embedded repetition is robust to inattention.

Authors:  Keiko Masutomi; Nicolas Barascud; Makio Kashino; Josh H McDermott; Maria Chait
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Visual mismatch negativity to masked stimuli presented at very brief presentation rates.

Authors:  Maria Flynn; Alki Liasis; Mark Gardner; Tony Towell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Data on the auditory duration mismatch negativity for different sound pressure levels and visual perceptual loads.

Authors:  Stefan Wiens; Malina Szychowska; Rasmus Eklund; Mats E Nilsson
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2017-02-08

8.  Auditory processing under cross-modal visual load investigated with simultaneous EEG-fMRI.

Authors:  Christina Regenbogen; Maarten De Vos; Stefan Debener; Bruce I Turetsky; Carolin Mössnang; Andreas Finkelmeyer; Ute Habel; Irene Neuner; Thilo Kellermann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The influence of visuospatial attention on unattended auditory 40 Hz responses.

Authors:  Cullen Roth; Cota Navin Gupta; Sergey M Plis; Eswar Damaraju; Siddharth Khullar; Vince D Calhoun; David A Bridwell
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Visual Task Demands and the Auditory Mismatch Negativity: An Empirical Study and a Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Stefan Wiens; Malina Szychowska; Mats E Nilsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.