Literature DB >> 19580366

Evaluating preference-sensitive care for uterine fibroids: it's not so simple.

Leif I Solberg1, Stephen E Asche, Louise H Anderson, Karen Sepucha, N Marcus Thygeson, Joan E Madden, Larry Morrissey, Karen K Kraemer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preference-sensitive care decisions should reflect an informed patient's preferences. This retrospective survey of women with fibroids, a benign condition with multiple treatment options, sought to evaluate the extent to which this was measurable and true.
METHODS: All 260 women in one medical group with visit codes for uterine fibroids during a 9-month period in 2006 were mailed surveys constructed through focus groups with physicians and interviews with patients. Correlations tested associations among their preferences, knowledge, and treatment decisions.
RESULTS: The adjusted response rate was 82%, but only 100 respondents fit all criteria for analysis. Nearly all wanted to either share or control the decision, and 86% felt informed, satisfied, and that the decision was consistent with their values. However, only 55% of patients could answer at least five of seven fibroid questions correctly. Hysterectomy use was significantly correlated with desire to relieve symptoms, have a permanent treatment, and do something right away (r = 0.36, 0.37, and 0.30, respectively). Those deciding not to treat were significantly less likely to have these preferences (r = -0.65, -0.40, and -0.58). These relationships were not affected by patient knowledge level, but patients with high knowledge scores were significantly more likely to believe their decision was concordant with their preferences (94.9% vs. 74.4%, p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: There were knowledge gaps but unclear associations between knowledge and decision-preference relationships for this condition, which has many different treatment alternatives. A prospective intervention trial is needed to determine if better information and counseling would produce stronger concordance between treatment selected and patient preferences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19580366     DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2008.0948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  1 in total

1.  An Altered Perception of Normal: Understanding Causes for Treatment Delay in Women with Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids.

Authors:  Marissa S Ghant; Katherine S Sengoba; Robert Vogelzang; Angela K Lawson; Erica E Marsh
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 2.681

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.