Literature DB >> 19578968

Natural history of CKD stage 4 and 5 patients following referral to renal management clinic.

Ai-Hua Zhang1, Paul Tam, Denise LeBlanc, Hui Zhong, Christopher T Chan, Joanne M Bargman, Dimitrios G Oreopoulos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: CKD patients referred to a renal management clinic are looked after by a multidisciplinary team whose care may improve outcome and delay the progression of kidney disease. This paper describes our experience and the results obtained in 940 patients with CKD stage 4 and 5 patients from two renal management clinics (RMC). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We collected and analyzed the data from 940 patients with CKD stage 4 and 5 at the RMCs of the Toronto General Hospital (TGH), University Health Network and The Scarborough General Hospital (TSH) from January 2000 to November 2007. Inclusion criteria for the study required at least three measurements of serum creatinine over a minimum follow-up of 6 months. We calculated the change of slope of the estimated GFR by linear regression analysis. The slopes were further subdivided into five groups: improved eGFR (eGFR slope >or=+5 ml/min/year); mild improvement (slope >+1 to <+5 ml/min/year); stable (slope <+1 to >-1 ml/min/year); slow progression (i.e., deterioration; slope <-1 to >-5 ml/min/year) and rapid progression (slope >-5 ml/min/year).
RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 1.57 year (range 0.5-8.7 year) of stage 4 patients, eGFR improved in 10.6%, showed mild improvement in 24.2%, was stable in 27.5%, showed slow progression in 28.8% and rapid progression in 8.9% of patients. During a median follow-up of 1.4 year (range 0.5-8 year) of CKD stage 5 patients, eGFR improved in only 1.3%, showed mild improvement in 4.3%, remained stable in 35.6%; showed slow progression in 19.7% and rapid progression in 39.1%. Between the two hospitals (TGH and TSH) there was a statistically significant difference in the number of visits per year for CKD stage 4 patients during the first, second and third year. However, the number of visits per year had no effect on the rate of decline. On univariate analysis, factors predicting non-progression in eGFR slope were eGFR at referral, the use of ACE inhibitors-ARBs and absence of cardiovascular disease. However, in logistic multivariate regression analysis, after adjusting for confounding factors only the eGFR at referral and ACE inhibitors-ARBs were independent factors for non-progression in eGFR. A significant percentage of CKD stage 4 patients attending a renal management clinic (RMC) showed non-progression or improvement in their kidney function. Although only few stage 5 CKD patients had improvement in their eGFR, 32% of them maintained their eGFR on conservative treatment for over 2 years delaying the initiation of dialysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19578968     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-009-9604-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  17 in total

1.  Attitudes of Canadian nephrologists toward multidisciplinary team-based CKD clinic care.

Authors:  David C Mendelssohn; Edwin B Toffelmire; Adeera Levin
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 2.  Renal senescence in 2008: progress and challenges.

Authors:  Xin J Zhou; Ramesh Saxena; Zhihong Liu; N D Vaziri; Fred G Silva
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Efficacy and safety of benazepril for advanced chronic renal insufficiency.

Authors:  Fan Fan Hou; Xun Zhang; Guo Hua Zhang; Di Xie; Ping Yan Chen; Wei Ru Zhang; Jian Ping Jiang; Min Liang; Guo Bao Wang; Zheng Rong Liu; Ren Wen Geng
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  The importance of standardization of creatinine in the implementation of guidelines and recommendations for CKD: implications for CKD management programmes.

Authors:  Wim Van Biesen; Raymond Vanholder; Nic Veys; Francis Verbeke; Joris Delanghe; Dirk De Bacquer; Norbert Lameire
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 5.992

5.  Improvement in eGFR in patients with chronic kidney disease attending a nephrology clinic.

Authors:  Hulya Taskapan; Paul Tam; Victoria Au; Stephen Chow; Jason Fung; Gordon Nagai; Janet Roscoe; Paul Ng; Tabo Sikaneta; Robert Ting; Dimitrios G Oreopoulos
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Predicting the risk of dialysis and transplant among patients with CKD: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Eric S Johnson; Micah L Thorp; Robert W Platt; David H Smith
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 8.860

7.  Survival benefit of nephrologic care in patients with diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Chin-Lin Tseng; Elizabeth F O Kern; Donald R Miller; Anjali Tiwari; Miriam Maney; Mangala Rajan; Leonard Pogach
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-01-14

8.  Prevalence of chronic kidney disease and decreased kidney function in the adult US population: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  Josef Coresh; Brad C Astor; Tom Greene; Garabed Eknoyan; Andrew S Levey
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 9.  An update on nutrition in chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Denis Fouque; Fitsum Guebre-Egziabher
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2006-11-24       Impact factor: 2.266

Review 10.  Osteoporosis in the elderly with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  F Fevzi Ersoy
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2006-11-11       Impact factor: 2.266

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  A perspective on chronic kidney disease progression.

Authors:  Jianyong Zhong; Hai-Chun Yang; Agnes B Fogo
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2016-12-14

2.  In-hospital mortality in patients with renal dysfunction admitted for myocardial infarction: the Emilia-Romagna region of Italy database of hospital admissions.

Authors:  Fabio Fabbian; Marco Pala; Alfredo De Giorgi; Fabio Manfredini; Alessandra Mallozzi Menegatti; Raffaella Salmi; Francesco Portaluppi; Massimo Gallerani; Roberto Manfredini
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Type 2 diabetes treatment and progression of chronic kidney disease in Italian family practice.

Authors:  G Ermini; C Tosetti; D Zocchi; M Mandreoli; M T Caletti; G Marchesini
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 4.  Chronic kidney disease prediction is an inexact science: The concept of "progressors" and "nonprogressors".

Authors:  Macaulay Amechi Chukwukadibia Onuigbo; Nneoma Agbasi
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2014-08-06

5.  Chronic kidney disease progression is mainly associated with non-recovery of acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Eric D'hoore; Nathalie Neirynck; Eva Schepers; Raymond Vanholder; Francis Verbeke; Mira Van Thielen; Wim Van Biesen
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 3.902

6.  Effect of multidisciplinary care of dialysis initiation for outpatients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Yoshihiko Imamura; Yasunori Takahashi; Satoru Uchida; Masateru Iwamoto; Rie Nakamura; Miki Yamauchi; Yuka Ogawara; Mikiko Goto; Kazuyo Takeba; Naomi Yaguchi; Nobuhiko Joki
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Twenty four-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and lipid levels before, 3, 6 and 12 months after the onset of hemodialysis in chronic kidney disease patients: a pilot study.

Authors:  Ag Vagiona; Sa Koupidis; P Passadakis; El Thodis; V Vargemezis
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 0.471

8.  Variability in estimated glomerular filtration rate values is a risk factor in chronic kidney disease progression among patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Chin-Lin Tseng; Jean-Philippe Lafrance; Shou-En Lu; Orysya Soroka; Donald R Miller; Miriam Maney; Leonard M Pogach
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 2.388

9.  Temporal validation of the CT-PIRP prognostic model for mortality and renal replacement therapy initiation in chronic kidney disease patients.

Authors:  Dino Gibertoni; Paola Rucci; Marcora Mandreoli; Mattia Corradini; Davide Martelli; Giorgia Russo; Elena Mancini; Antonio Santoro
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 2.388

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.