Literature DB >> 19578805

Morphometry of sacral hiatus and its clinical relevance in caudal epidural block.

Anjali Aggarwal1, Aditya Aggarwal, Daisy Sahni.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sacral approach to epidural space produces reliable and effective block of sacral nerves. It is necessary to have a detailed knowledge of sacral hiatus (SH) for optimal access into sacral epidural space. This study was undertaken to evaluate various landmarks of SH.
METHODS: One hundred and fourteen adult dry human sacral bones were examined for morphometric analysis using vernier caliper. SH was categorized on the basis of shape.
RESULTS: Most commonly encountered shape of hiatus was inverted U (40.35%). Its apex and base were most commonly observed against fourth and fifth sacral vertebrae, respectively. Various defects in dorsal wall of sacral canal were recorded. Height and anteroposterior depth at the apex of hiatus were ranged 4.30-38.60 and 1.90-10.40 mm, respectively. Mean intercornual distance at base was 11.95 +/- 2.78 mm. The triangle formed by right and left posterior superior iliac spines and apex of SH was found equilateral in 45% cases only. Sacral cornua were marked by their bilateral presence in 55.26% and impalpable in 21.05% cases. Minimum distance between S2 and apex was 7.25 mm which suggested that it would not be safe to push the needle beyond 7 mm into sacral canal so as to avoid dural puncture. In 8.77% cases, depth of hiatus was less than 3 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: Single bony landmark may not help in locating SH because of anatomical variations. Depth of hiatus less than 3 mm may be one of the causes for failure of needle insertion. Surrounding bony irregularities, different shapes of hiatus and defects in dorsal wall of sacral canal should be taken into consideration before undertaking caudal epidural block so as to avoid its failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19578805     DOI: 10.1007/s00276-009-0529-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat        ISSN: 0930-1038            Impact factor:   1.246


  7 in total

1.  An anatomic study of the sacral hiatus: a basis for successful caudal epidural block.

Authors:  Miho Sekiguchi; Shoji Yabuki; Koichiro Satoh; Shinichi Kikuchi
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.442

2.  Ultrasound guidance in caudal epidural needle placement.

Authors:  Carl P C Chen; Simon F T Tang; Tsz-Ching Hsu; Wen-Chung Tsai; Hung-Pin Liu; Max J L Chen; Elaine Date; Henry L Lew
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Landmarks of the sacral hiatus for caudal epidural block: an anatomical study.

Authors:  N Senoglu; M Senoglu; H Oksuz; Y Gumusalan; K Z Yuksel; B Zencirci; M Ezberci; E Kizilkanat
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2005-09-09       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Anatomic reasons for caudal anesthesia failure.

Authors:  M G BLACK
Journal:  Curr Res Anesth Analg       Date:  1949 Jan-Feb

5.  Variations of the sacral canal; their significance in the administration of caudal analgesia.

Authors:  M TROTTER
Journal:  Curr Res Anesth Analg       Date:  1947 Sep-Oct

6.  A controlled study of caudal epidural injections of triamcinolone plus procaine for the management of intractable sciatica.

Authors:  K Bush; S Hillier
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The use of epidural steroids in the treatment of lumbar radicular pain. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study.

Authors:  J M Cuckler; P A Bernini; S W Wiesel; R E Booth; R H Rothman; G T Pickens
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 5.284

  7 in total
  14 in total

1.  The caudal space in fetuses: an anatomical study.

Authors:  Anjali Aggarwal; Daisy Sahni; Harjeet Kaur; Yatindra K Batra; Rakesh Sondekoppam Vijayashankar
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Transverse plane ultrasound-guided caudal epidural injections: sonographic anatomy and stepwise technique.

Authors:  James Inklebarger; Trifon Totlis; Georg Feigl; Maksim Tishukov; Nikiforos Galanis
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Anatomy of the sacral hiatus and its clinical relevance in caudal epidural block.

Authors:  Hassan Bagheri; Figen Govsa
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Where is the apex of the sacral hiatus for caudal epidural block in the pediatric population? A radio-anatomic study.

Authors:  Aynur Emine Cicekcibasi; Hale Borazan; Sule Arıcan; Mehmet Tugrul Yılmaz; Mehmet Emin Sakarya
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  The evaluation of upper leg traction in lateral position for pediatric caudal block.

Authors:  Mahin Seyedhejazi; Reza Taheri; Morteza Ghojazadeh
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2011-07

6.  A Comparison of Two Techniques for Ultrasound-guided Caudal Injection: The Influence of the Depth of the Inserted Needle on Caudal Block.

Authors:  A Ram Doo; Jin Wan Kim; Ji Hye Lee; Young Jin Han; Ji Seon Son
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2015-04-01

7.  Assessment of factors affecting the difficulty of caudal epidural injections in adults using ultrasound.

Authors:  Young Hoon Kim; Hue Jung Park; Sungkun Cho; Dong Eon Moon
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.037

Review 8.  Caudal Epidural Block: An Updated Review of Anatomy and Techniques.

Authors:  Sheng-Chin Kao; Chia-Shiang Lin
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-02-26       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Morphometric study of sacral hiatus in adult human Egyptian sacra: Their significance in caudal epidural anesthesia.

Authors:  Mohamed S Mustafa; Omayma M Mahmoud; Hoda H A El Raouf; Hosam M Atef
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2012 Oct-Dec

10.  Morphologic diversities of sacral canal in children; three-dimensional computed tomographic study.

Authors:  Dae Wook Kim; Seung Jun Lee; Eun Joo Choi; Pyung Bok Lee; Young Hyun Jo; Francis Sahngun Nahm
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2014-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.