Literature DB >> 19578165

Magnetic resonance imaging and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: relative merits of left ventricular dyssynchrony and scar tissue.

Nina Ajmone Marsan1, Jos J M Westenberg, Claudia Ypenburg, Rutger J van Bommel, Stijntje Roes, Victoria Delgado, Laurens F Tops, Rob J van der Geest, Eric Boersma, Albert de Roos, Martin J Schalij, Jeroen J Bax.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess the relative value of a novel measure of left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony derived from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the extent of scar tissue for prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). METHODS AND
RESULTS: Thirty-five heart failure patients scheduled for CRT were included. Left ventricular dyssynchrony was defined as the standard deviation of 16 segment time-to-maximum radial wall thickness (SDt-16) obtained from a cine-set of short-axis slices. Delayed-enhanced MRI was performed for scar analysis. Echocardiography was used to determine response to CRT (reduction > or =15% in LV end-systolic volume 6 months after implantation). At follow-up, 21 patients (60%) were classified as responders. On MRI, SDt-16 was significantly higher in responders compared with non-responders (median 97 vs. 60 ms, P < 0.001), whereas the total extent of scar was larger in non-responders (median 35% vs. 3% in responders, P < 0.001). At the logistic regression analysis, SDt-16 was directly associated (OR = 6.3, 95% CI 3.1-9.9, P < 0.001) and the total extent of scar was inversely associated (OR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.43-0.87, P < 0.001) with response to CRT.
CONCLUSION: Magnetic resonance imaging offers the unique opportunity to assess LV dyssynchrony and scar extent in a single session. Both these parameters are important predictors of echocardiographic response to CRT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19578165     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  33 in total

1.  Periprocedural management of cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  John Rickard; Niraj Varma
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-04

2.  SPECT gated blood pool phase analysis of lateral wall motion for prediction of CRT response.

Authors:  Michel Lalonde; David Birnie; Terrence D Ruddy; Robert A deKemp; Rob S B Beanlands; Richard Wassenaar; R Glenn Wells
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Baseline asynchrony, assessed circumferentially using temporal uniformity of strain, besides coincidence between site of latest mechanical activation and presumed left ventricular lead position, predicts favourable prognosis after resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Chiara Cavallino; Elisa Rondano; Andrea Magnani; Lucia Leva; Eugenio Inglese; Gabriele Dell'era; Eraldo Occhetta; Miriam Bortnik; Paolo N Marino
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-06-19       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 4.  Nonechocardiographic imaging in evaluation for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Wael AlJaroudi; Ji Chen; Wael A Jaber; Steven G Lloyd; Manuel D Cerqueira; Thomas Marwick
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 7.792

5.  Ventricular pacing site separation by cardiac computed tomography: validation for the prediction of clinical response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  S Modi; Raymond Yee; David Scholl; John Stirrat; Jorge A Wong; Carmen Lydell; Vamshi Kotha; Lorne J Gula; Allan C Skanes; Peter Leong-Sit; David McCarty; Maria Drangova; James A White
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  [Clinical indications for the use of cardiac MRI. By the SIRM Study Group on Cardiac Imaging].

Authors:  E Di Cesare; F Cademartiri; I Carbone; A Carriero; M Centonze; F De Cobelli; R De Rosa; P Di Renzi; A Esposito; R Faletti; R Fattori; M Francone; A Giovagnoni; L La Grutta; G Ligabue; L Lovato; R Marano; M Midiri; A Romagnoli; V Russo; F Sardanelli; L Natale; J Bogaert; A De Roos
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  The potential role of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging in patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Nina Ajmone Marsan; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Combined identification of septal flash and absence of myocardial scar by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging improves prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Manav Sohal; Sana Amraoui; Zhong Chen; Eva Sammut; Tom Jackson; Matthew Wright; Mark O'Neill; Jaswinder Gill; Gerald Carr-White; C Aldo Rinaldi; Reza Razavi
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 1.900

9.  Patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot suffer from intra- and inter-ventricular cardiac dyssynchrony: a cardiac magnetic resonance study.

Authors:  Linyuan Jing; Christopher M Haggerty; Jonathan D Suever; Sudad Alhadad; Ashwin Prakash; Frank Cecchin; Oskar Skrinjar; Tal Geva; Andrew J Powell; Brandon K Fornwalt
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 10.  Quantification in cardiac MRI: advances in image acquisition and processing.

Authors:  Anil K Attili; Andreas Schuster; Eike Nagel; Johan H C Reiber; Rob J van der Geest
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.