AIM: To assess the relative value of a novel measure of left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony derived from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the extent of scar tissue for prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-five heart failure patients scheduled for CRT were included. Left ventricular dyssynchrony was defined as the standard deviation of 16 segment time-to-maximum radial wall thickness (SDt-16) obtained from a cine-set of short-axis slices. Delayed-enhanced MRI was performed for scar analysis. Echocardiography was used to determine response to CRT (reduction > or =15% in LV end-systolic volume 6 months after implantation). At follow-up, 21 patients (60%) were classified as responders. On MRI, SDt-16 was significantly higher in responders compared with non-responders (median 97 vs. 60 ms, P < 0.001), whereas the total extent of scar was larger in non-responders (median 35% vs. 3% in responders, P < 0.001). At the logistic regression analysis, SDt-16 was directly associated (OR = 6.3, 95% CI 3.1-9.9, P < 0.001) and the total extent of scar was inversely associated (OR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.43-0.87, P < 0.001) with response to CRT. CONCLUSION: Magnetic resonance imaging offers the unique opportunity to assess LV dyssynchrony and scar extent in a single session. Both these parameters are important predictors of echocardiographic response to CRT.
AIM: To assess the relative value of a novel measure of left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony derived from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the extent of scar tissue for prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-five heart failurepatients scheduled for CRT were included. Left ventricular dyssynchrony was defined as the standard deviation of 16 segment time-to-maximum radial wall thickness (SDt-16) obtained from a cine-set of short-axis slices. Delayed-enhanced MRI was performed for scar analysis. Echocardiography was used to determine response to CRT (reduction > or =15% in LV end-systolic volume 6 months after implantation). At follow-up, 21 patients (60%) were classified as responders. On MRI, SDt-16 was significantly higher in responders compared with non-responders (median 97 vs. 60 ms, P < 0.001), whereas the total extent of scar was larger in non-responders (median 35% vs. 3% in responders, P < 0.001). At the logistic regression analysis, SDt-16 was directly associated (OR = 6.3, 95% CI 3.1-9.9, P < 0.001) and the total extent of scar was inversely associated (OR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.43-0.87, P < 0.001) with response to CRT. CONCLUSION: Magnetic resonance imaging offers the unique opportunity to assess LV dyssynchrony and scar extent in a single session. Both these parameters are important predictors of echocardiographic response to CRT.
Authors: Michel Lalonde; David Birnie; Terrence D Ruddy; Robert A deKemp; Rob S B Beanlands; Richard Wassenaar; R Glenn Wells Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2014-01-09 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Wael AlJaroudi; Ji Chen; Wael A Jaber; Steven G Lloyd; Manuel D Cerqueira; Thomas Marwick Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: S Modi; Raymond Yee; David Scholl; John Stirrat; Jorge A Wong; Carmen Lydell; Vamshi Kotha; Lorne J Gula; Allan C Skanes; Peter Leong-Sit; David McCarty; Maria Drangova; James A White Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2017-03-29 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: E Di Cesare; F Cademartiri; I Carbone; A Carriero; M Centonze; F De Cobelli; R De Rosa; P Di Renzi; A Esposito; R Faletti; R Fattori; M Francone; A Giovagnoni; L La Grutta; G Ligabue; L Lovato; R Marano; M Midiri; A Romagnoli; V Russo; F Sardanelli; L Natale; J Bogaert; A De Roos Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2012-11-26 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Linyuan Jing; Christopher M Haggerty; Jonathan D Suever; Sudad Alhadad; Ashwin Prakash; Frank Cecchin; Oskar Skrinjar; Tal Geva; Andrew J Powell; Brandon K Fornwalt Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2014-07-04 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Anil K Attili; Andreas Schuster; Eike Nagel; Johan H C Reiber; Rob J van der Geest Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 2.357