Literature DB >> 19577956

Factors affecting health care workers' adoption of a website with infection control guidelines.

Fenne Verhoeven1, Michaël F Steehouder, Ron M G Hendrix, Julia E W C van Gemert-Pijnen.   

Abstract

GOAL: To identify factors that could affect health care workers' (HCWs) adoption of a website for communicating infection control guidelines.
METHODS: In total, 20 semi-structured interviews were conducted with HCWs in 5 different occupational groups and 4 different hospitals in the Netherlands and Germany. A website communicating guidelines for the prevention and control of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus served as a casus. The HCWs, the majority of whom had prior experience with the website, were asked to give their opinions about factors that hinder or facilitate adoption of the website in practice. The interviews were based on the PRECEDE (Predisposing, Reinforcing, and Enabling Causes in Educational Diagnosis and Evaluation) model complemented by quality criteria for health-related websites. This model encompasses different categories of factors relevant to technology adoption in health care.
RESULTS: A total of 361 interview statements were relevant to the four main categories of the PRECEDE model, yielding the following observations: (1) Technological factors (72 statements): The usability, design, and relevance of the website were positively valued. The website enabled HCWs to access contextually relevant information quickly. The website's credibility was evaluated rather negatively, as respondents perceived that the website's guidelines were not in concurrence with the best available evidence and it was not clear to HCWs who created the website. (2) Individual factors (85 statements): Respondents, particular infection control professionals, showed individual resistance to the website because they preferred to use their personal knowledge and experience (and communication with colleagues) over online sources. (3) Work-related factors (53 statements): Respondents perceived high work pressure during working hours as an impediment to consulting the website. In contrast, respondents thought the website might lower work pressure for infection control professionals, as they will receive fewer questions from HCWs. (4) Organizational factors (131 statements): Interpersonal (face-to-face) communication between HCWs from different occupational groups in both a formal (training) and informal (feedback) manner was seen as the most stimulating factor behind website use. The respondents identified infection control nurses as the most important opinion leaders.
CONCLUSION: Factors from multiple categories determine HCWs' adoption of web-based guidelines, but the organization appeared to be a paramount reinforcer of initiation and maintenance of technology adoption among HCWs. In order eliminate resistance and create ownership among HCWs toward the website, leading to a willingness to integrate the website into routine care, it is essential to more actively involve HCWs in the early phases of the design process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19577956     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Inform        ISSN: 1386-5056            Impact factor:   4.046


  10 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of factors influencing the adoption of information and communication technologies by healthcare professionals.

Authors:  Marie-Pierre Gagnon; Marie Desmartis; Michel Labrecque; Josip Car; Claudia Pagliari; Pierre Pluye; Pierre Frémont; Johanne Gagnon; Nadine Tremblay; France Légaré
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  User perspectives on the usability of a regional health information exchange.

Authors:  Cynthia S Gadd; Yun-Xian Ho; Cather Marie Cala; Dana Blakemore; Qingxia Chen; Mark E Frisse; Kevin B Johnson
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  HPV vaccine information-seeking behaviors among US physicians: government, media, or colleagues?

Authors:  Shalanda A Bynum; Teri L Malo; Ji-Hyun Lee; Anna R Guiliano; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Software Prototyping: A Case Report of Refining User Requirements for a Health Information Exchange Dashboard.

Authors:  Scott D Nelson; Guilherme Del Fiol; Haley Hanseler; Barbara Insley Crouch; Mollie R Cummins
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 2.342

5.  Health care professionals' beliefs about using wiki-based reminders to promote best practices in trauma care.

Authors:  Patrick Michel Archambault; Andrea Bilodeau; Marie-Pierre Gagnon; Karine Aubin; André Lavoie; Jean Lapointe; Julien Poitras; Sylvain Croteau; Martin Pham-Dinh; France Légaré
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 6.  What is the extent of research on the characteristics, behaviors, and impacts of health information technology champions? A scoping review.

Authors:  Christopher Michael Shea; Charles M Belden
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  eHealth adoption and use among healthcare professionals in a tertiary hospital in Sub-Saharan Africa: a Qmethodology study.

Authors:  Muhammad Awwal Ladan; Heather Wharrad; Richard Windle
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Information retrieval - Swedish specialist student nurses` strategies for finding clinical evidence.

Authors:  Cathrin Madsen-Rihlert; Kerstin Nilsson; Margareta Warrèn Stomber
Journal:  Open Nurs J       Date:  2012-05-02

9.  Quality of Web-Based Educational Interventions for Clinicians on Human Papillomavirus Vaccine: Content and Usability Assessment.

Authors:  Brittany L Rosen; James M Bishop; Skye L McDonald; Jessica A Kahn; Gary L Kreps
Journal:  JMIR Cancer       Date:  2018-02-16

Review 10.  Role of Human Factors Engineering in Infection Prevention: Gaps and Opportunities.

Authors:  Priyadarshini R Pennathur; Loreen A Herwaldt
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Infect Dis       Date:  2017-05-06
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.