Literature DB >> 19577347

Proteinuria as a surrogate outcome in CKD: report of a scientific workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation and the US Food and Drug Administration.

Andrew S Levey1, Daniel Cattran, Aaron Friedman, W Greg Miller, John Sedor, Katherine Tuttle, Bertram Kasiske, Thomas Hostetter.   

Abstract

Changes in proteinuria have been suggested as a surrogate outcome for kidney disease progression to facilitate the conduct of clinical trials. This report summarizes a workshop sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) with the following goals: (1) to evaluate the strengths and limitations of criteria for assessment of proteinuria as a potential surrogate end point for clinical trials in chronic kidney disease (CKD), (2) to explore the strengths and limitations of available data for proteinuria as a potential surrogate end point, and (3) to delineate what more needs to be done to evaluate proteinuria as a potential surrogate end point. We review the importance of proteinuria in CKD, including the conceptual model for CKD, measurement of proteinuria and albuminuria, and epidemiological characteristics of albuminuria in the United States. We discuss surrogate end points in clinical trials of drug therapy, including criteria for drug approval, the definition of a surrogate end point, and criteria for evaluation of surrogacy based on biological plausibility, epidemiological characteristics, and clinical trials. Next, the report summarizes data for proteinuria as a potential surrogate outcome in 3 broad clinical areas: early diabetic kidney disease, nephrotic syndrome, and diseases with mild to moderate proteinuria. We conclude with a synthesis of data and recommendations for further research. At the present time, there appears to be sufficient evidence to recommend changes in proteinuria as a surrogate for kidney disease progression in only selected circumstances. Further research is needed to define additional contexts in which changes in proteinuria can be expected to predict treatment effect. We recommend collaboration among many groups, including academia, industry, the FDA, and the National Institutes of Health, to share data from past and future studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19577347     DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.04.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis        ISSN: 0272-6386            Impact factor:   8.860


  113 in total

Review 1.  Dual renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade for diabetic kidney disease.

Authors:  Raimund H Pichler; Ian H de Boer
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.810

2.  Intensive diabetes therapy and glomerular filtration rate in type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Ian H de Boer; Wanjie Sun; Patricia A Cleary; John M Lachin; Mark E Molitch; Michael W Steffes; Bernard Zinman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  A proposal for improving the KDIGO renal disease risk table.

Authors:  N R Robles; J F Macias; J Alvarez-Gregori
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Relapse or worsening of nephrotic syndrome in idiopathic membranous nephropathy can occur even though the glomerular immune deposits have been eradicated.

Authors:  Chadwick E Barnes; William A Wilmer; Raul A Hernandez; Christopher Valentine; Leena S Hiremath; Tibor Nadasdy; Anjali A Satoskar; Rose L Shim; Brad H Rovin; Lee A Hebert
Journal:  Nephron Clin Pract       Date:  2011-07-08

5.  Novel therapeutic approaches to chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Neeraj Dhaun; David J Webb
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 6.  The use of targeted biomarkers for chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Prasad Devarajan
Journal:  Adv Chronic Kidney Dis       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.620

Review 7.  When to initiate ACEI/ARB therapy in patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Kevin V Lemley
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 8.  Normoalbuminuric diabetic kidney disease.

Authors:  Chao Chen; Chang Wang; Chun Hu; Yachun Han; Li Zhao; Xuejing Zhu; Li Xiao; Lin Sun
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 4.592

9.  Usefulness of the quantitative measurement of urine protein at a community-based health checkup: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Masahiro Naruse; Masashi Mukoyama; Jun Morinaga; Masanobu Miyazaki; Kunitoshi Iseki; Kunihiro Yamagata
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 2.801

10.  Microalbuminuria in HIV disease.

Authors:  Colleen Hadigan; Elizabeth Edwards; Alice Rosenberg; Julia B Purdy; Estee Fleischman; Lilian Howard; JoAnn M Mican; Karmini Sampath; Akinbowale Oyalowo; Antoinette Johnson; Alexandra Adler; Catherine Rehm; Margo Smith; Leon Lai; Jeffrey B Kopp
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 3.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.