Literature DB >> 19577249

Revisiting the role of nonanatomic resection of small (< or = 4 cm) and single hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with well-preserved liver function.

Chang Moo Kang1, Gi Hong Choi, Dong Hyun Kim, Sae Byeol Choi, Kyung Sik Kim, Jin Sub Choi, Woo Jung Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anatomic resection of the liver in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is generally recommended. Several previous reports have described the potential superiority of anatomic resection. However, no clear evidence of long-term survival or other advantages compared with those achieved with limited resection exist. We evaluated the oncologic outcomes of nonanatomic resection performed as a primary treatment for small (<or=4 cm) and single HCC in patients with well-preserved liver function (Child-Pugh class A).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From March 1998 to January 2005, 353 consecutive patients underwent resection of HCC. Among them, 167 patients with single and small (<or=4 cm) HCC and well-preserved liver function (Child-Pugh class A) were selected. Twenty-one patients (12.6%) underwent nonanatomic resection (Group NA) and 146 (82.4%) underwent anatomic resection (Group A). Patient factors, tumor factors, surgery factors, disease-free survival, and recurrence patterns were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: There were no significantly different preoperative clinical characteristics between the two groups (Group NA versus Group A). Only the resection margin width (0.8 +/- 0.6 cm versus 2.0 +/- 1.4 cm, P < 0.001) and operative time (211.9 +/- 72.9 min versus 251 +/- 80.0 min, P = 0.036) were significantly different between the two groups. There was no difference in disease-free survival between the two groups, and platelet counts of less than 100,000/microL (P = 0.038), satellite nodules (P = 0.0164), and microscopic portal vein invasion (P < 0.001) were significant prognostic factors predicting disease-free survival in univariate analysis. Subsequent Cox-proportional hazards models revealed that both microscopic portal vein invasion (Exp {beta} = 3.281, P < 0.001) and platelet counts of less than 100,000/microL (Exp {beta} = 1.913, P = 0.012) adversely affected disease-free survival. Nonanatomic resection did not have adverse effects on early recurrence compared to anatomic resection (P = 0.805).
CONCLUSION: Our study showed that nonanatomic resection has no adverse effects on the oncologic outcomes of single and small (<or=4 cm) HCC in patients with well-preserved liver function (Child-Pugh class A). Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19577249     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.01.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  19 in total

1.  Central Hepatectomy Still Plays an Important Role in Treatment of Early-Stage Centrally Located Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Chun-Han Chen; Tzu-Hao Huang; Cheng-Chih Chang; Wei-Feng Li; Ting-Lung Lin; Chih-Chi Wang
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Successful Anatomic Resection of Tumor-Bearing Portal Territory Delays Long-Term Stage Progression of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Junichi Shindoh; Yuta Kobayashi; Ryosuke Umino; Kazutaka Kojima; Satoshi Okubo; Masaji Hashimoto
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Hepatocellular carcinoma: clinical study of long-term survival and choice of treatment modalities.

Authors:  Ke-Tong Wu; Cun-Chuan Wang; Li-Gong Lu; Wei-Dong Zhang; Fu-Jun Zhang; Feng Shi; Chuan-Xing Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Reappraisal of evidence of microscopic portal vein involvement by hepatocellular carcinoma cells with stratification of tumor size.

Authors:  Yuesi Zhong; Meihai Deng; Ruiyun Xu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Nomogram to Assist in Surgical Plan for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Prediction Model for Microvascular Invasion.

Authors:  Shengtao Lin; Feng Ye; Weiqi Rong; Ying Song; Fan Wu; Yunhe Liu; Yiling Zheng; Tana Siqin; Kai Zhang; Liming Wang; Jianxiong Wu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Thrombocytopenia for prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qing Pang; Kai Qu; Jian-Bin Bi; Su-Shun Liu; Jing-Yao Zhang; Si-Dong Song; Ting Lin; Xin-Sen Xu; Yong Wan; Ming-Hui Tai; Hao-Chen Liu; Ya-Feng Dong; Chang Liu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Meta-analysis of anatomic resection versus nonanatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Yanming Zhou; Donghui Xu; Lupeng Wu; Bin Li
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Anatomical Versus Non-anatomical Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma, a Propensity-matched Analysis Between Taiwanese and Japanese Patients.

Authors:  Shih-Wei Huang; Pei-Yi Chu; Shunichi Ariizumi; Charles Chung-Wei Lin; Hon Phin Wong; Dev-Aur Chou; Ming-Tsung Lee; Hsing-Ju Wu; Masakazu Yamamoto
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 9.  Laparoscopic liver resection: Experience based guidelines.

Authors:  Fabricio Ferreira Coelho; Jaime Arthur Pirola Kruger; Gilton Marques Fonseca; Raphael Leonardo Cunha Araújo; Vagner Birk Jeismann; Marcos Vinícius Perini; Renato Micelli Lupinacci; Ivan Cecconello; Paulo Herman
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-01-27

10.  Percutaneous Microwave Ablation Versus Open Surgical Resection for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis.

Authors:  Qinxian Zhao; Zhigang Cheng; Zhiyu Han; Fangyi Liu; Xiaoling Yu; Xianliang Tan; Bin Han; Jianping Dou; Jie Yu; Ping Liang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.