BACKGROUND: Phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas are neuro-endocrine tumours that occur sporadically and in several hereditary tumour syndromes, including the phaeochromocytoma-paraganglioma syndrome. This syndrome is caused by germline mutations in succinate dehydrogenase B (SDHB), C (SDHC), or D (SDHD) genes. Clinically, the phaeochromocytoma-paraganglioma syndrome is often unrecognised, although 10-30% of apparently sporadic phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas harbour germline SDH-gene mutations. Despite these figures, the screening of phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas for mutations in the SDH genes to detect phaeochromocytoma-paraganglioma syndrome is rarely done because of time and financial constraints. We investigated whether SDHB immunohistochemistry could effectively discriminate between SDH-related and non-SDH-related phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas in large retrospective and prospective tumour series. METHODS: Immunohistochemistry for SDHB was done on 220 tumours. Two retrospective series of 175 phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas with known germline mutation status for phaeochromocytoma-susceptibility or paraganglioma-susceptibility genes were investigated. Additionally, a prospective series of 45 phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas was investigated for SDHB immunostaining followed by SDHB, SDHC, and SDHD mutation testing. FINDINGS: SDHB protein expression was absent in all 102 phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas with an SDHB, SDHC, or SDHD mutation, but was present in all 65 paraganglionic tumours related to multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2, von Hippel-Lindau disease, and neurofibromatosis type 1. 47 (89%) of the 53 phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas with no syndromic germline mutation showed SDHB expression. The sensitivity and specificity of the SDHB immunohistochemistry to detect the presence of an SDH mutation in the prospective series were 100% (95% CI 87-100) and 84% (60-97), respectively. INTERPRETATION: Phaeochromocytoma-paraganglioma syndrome can be diagnosed reliably by an immunohistochemical procedure. SDHB, SDHC, and SDHD germline mutation testing is indicated only in patients with SDHB-negative tumours. SDHB immunohistochemistry on phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas could improve the diagnosis of phaeochromocytoma-paraganglioma syndrome. FUNDING: The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research, Dutch Cancer Society, Vanderes Foundation, Association pour la Recherche contre le Cancer, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, and a PHRC grant COMETE 3 for the COMETE network.
BACKGROUND:Phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas are neuro-endocrine tumours that occur sporadically and in several hereditary tumour syndromes, including the phaeochromocytoma-paraganglioma syndrome. This syndrome is caused by germline mutations in succinate dehydrogenase B (SDHB), C (SDHC), or D (SDHD) genes. Clinically, the phaeochromocytoma-paraganglioma syndrome is often unrecognised, although 10-30% of apparently sporadic phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas harbour germline SDH-gene mutations. Despite these figures, the screening of phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas for mutations in the SDH genes to detect phaeochromocytoma-paraganglioma syndrome is rarely done because of time and financial constraints. We investigated whether SDHB immunohistochemistry could effectively discriminate between SDH-related and non-SDH-related phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas in large retrospective and prospective tumour series. METHODS: Immunohistochemistry for SDHB was done on 220 tumours. Two retrospective series of 175 phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas with known germline mutation status for phaeochromocytoma-susceptibility or paraganglioma-susceptibility genes were investigated. Additionally, a prospective series of 45 phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas was investigated for SDHB immunostaining followed by SDHB, SDHC, and SDHD mutation testing. FINDINGS:SDHB protein expression was absent in all 102 phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas with an SDHB, SDHC, or SDHD mutation, but was present in all 65 paraganglionic tumours related to multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2, von Hippel-Lindau disease, and neurofibromatosis type 1. 47 (89%) of the 53 phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas with no syndromic germline mutation showed SDHB expression. The sensitivity and specificity of the SDHB immunohistochemistry to detect the presence of an SDH mutation in the prospective series were 100% (95% CI 87-100) and 84% (60-97), respectively. INTERPRETATION:Phaeochromocytoma-paraganglioma syndrome can be diagnosed reliably by an immunohistochemical procedure. SDHB, SDHC, and SDHD germline mutation testing is indicated only in patients with SDHB-negative tumours. SDHB immunohistochemistry on phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas could improve the diagnosis of phaeochromocytoma-paraganglioma syndrome. FUNDING: The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research, Dutch Cancer Society, Vanderes Foundation, Association pour la Recherche contre le Cancer, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, and a PHRC grant COMETE 3 for the COMETE network.
Authors: Francien H van Nederveen; Esther Korpershoek; Jacques W M Lenders; Ronald R de Krijger; Winand N M Dinjens Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-07-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: P B Douwes Dekker; P C W Hogendoorn; N Kuipers-Dijkshoorn; F A Prins; S G van Duinen; P E M Taschner; A G L van der Mey; C J Cornelisse Journal: J Pathol Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 7.996
Authors: A P Gimenez-Roqueplo; J Favier; P Rustin; J J Mourad; P F Plouin; P Corvol; A Rötig; X Jeunemaitre Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2001-10-16 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Hilde Dannenberg; Winand N M Dinjens; Mustaffa Abbou; Hero Van Urk; Bernard K H Pauw; Diane Mouwen; Wolter J Mooi; Ronald R de Krijger Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Christopher Ricketts; Emma R Woodward; Pip Killick; Mark R Morris; Dewi Astuti; Farida Latif; Eamonn R Maher Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2008-08-26 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Patricia L M Dahia; Ken N Ross; Matthew E Wright; César Y Hayashida; Sandro Santagata; Marta Barontini; Andrew L Kung; Gabriela Sanso; James F Powers; Arthur S Tischler; Richard Hodin; Shannon Heitritter; Francis Moore; Robert Dluhy; Julie Ann Sosa; I Tolgay Ocal; Diana E Benn; Deborah J Marsh; Bruce G Robinson; Katherine Schneider; Judy Garber; Seth M Arum; Márta Korbonits; Ashley Grossman; Pascal Pigny; Sérgio P A Toledo; Vania Nosé; Cheng Li; Charles D Stiles Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2005-07-25 Impact factor: 5.917
Authors: Ricardo Celestino; Jorge Lima; Alexandra Faustino; Valdemar Máximo; António Gouveia; João Vinagre; Paula Soares; José Manuel Lopes Journal: Fam Cancer Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Carmen Tenorio Jiménez; Louise Izatt; Fuju Chang; Mufaddal T Moonim; Paul V Carroll; Barbara M McGowan Journal: Endocr Pathol Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 3.943
Authors: José Gaal; Constantine A Stratakis; J Aidan Carney; Evan R Ball; Esther Korpershoek; Maya B Lodish; Isaac Levy; Paraskevi Xekouki; Francien H van Nederveen; Michael A den Bakker; Maureen O'Sullivan; Winand N M Dinjens; Ronald R de Krijger Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2010-10-01 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Johan Kugelberg; Jenny Welander; Francesca Schiavi; Ambrogio Fassina; Martin Bäckdahl; Catharina Larsson; Giuseppe Opocher; Peter Söderkvist; Patricia L Dahia; Hartmut P H Neumann; Oliver Gimm Journal: World J Surg Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Paraskevi Xekouki; Ana Brennand; Ben Whitelaw; Karel Pacak; Constantine A Stratakis Journal: Horm Metab Res Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 2.936
Authors: Markku Miettinen; Maarit Sarlomo-Rikala; Peter McCue; Piotr Czapiewski; Renata Langfort; Piotr Waloszczyk; Krzysztof Wazny; Wojciech Biernat; Jerzy Lasota; Zengfeng Wang Journal: Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol Date: 2014-01