Literature DB >> 19576378

Evaluation of the porcine model to teach various ancillary procedures to gynecologic oncology fellows.

Mitchel S Hoffman1, Leo E Ondrovic, Robert M Wenham, Sachin M Apte, Murray L Shames, Emanuel E Zervos, William S Weinberg, William S Roberts.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to subjectively evaluate the adequacy of the porcine model for training gynecologic oncology fellows. STUDY
DESIGN: Following a defined surgical curriculum, fellow-attending pairs operated on female hogs. A predetermined dataset was collected for each procedure.
RESULTS: Twenty pigs were operated on. The porcine model was determined to be a good model for laparoscopic lymphadenectomy (11), ureteroneocystostomy (7), repair of vascular injury (11), bowel anastamoses (21), distal pancreatectomy (5), nephrectomy (6), partial hepatectomy (5), diaphram stripping (5), and diaphragmatic resection (4). Two attendings and 1 fellow judged the porcine model to be fair (remaining 11 good) for ileocolonic urinary diversion, mainly due to significant differences in anatomy. Liver mobilization (5) and splenectomy (11) were determined to be fair or poor models by all participants due to the limited attachments in the pig.
CONCLUSION: The porcine model is adequate for teaching some ancillary gynecologic oncology surgical procedures and is inadequate for others.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19576378     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.04.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  5 in total

1.  Simulation of robotic radical hysterectomy using the porcine model.

Authors:  Mitchel Hoffman
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-08-13

2.  Sequential learning of psychomotor and visuospatial skills for laparoscopic suturing and knot tying-a randomized controlled trial "The Shoebox Study" DRKS00008668.

Authors:  Felix Nickel; Jonathan D Hendrie; Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski; Thomas Bruckner; Carly R Garrow; Maisha Mantel; Hannes G Kenngott; Philipp Romero; Lars Fischer; Beat P Müller-Stich
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  A live porcine model for robotic sacrocolpopexy training.

Authors:  Khushabu Kasabwala; Ramy Goueli; Patrick J Culligan
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Sequential learning of psychomotor and visuospatial skills for laparoscopic suturing and knot tying - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial "The shoebox study".

Authors:  Jonathan D Hendrie; Felix Nickel; Thomas Bruckner; Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski; Carly R Garrow; Maisha Mantel; Philipp Romero; Beat P Müller-Stich
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Major vascular injury during gynecologic cancer surgery.

Authors:  Andrea L Buras; Jing Yi Chern; Hye Sook Chon; Mian M Shahzad; Robert M Wenham; Mitchel S Hoffman
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-06-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.