Literature DB >> 19576376

Abdominal cerclage for the treatment of recurrent cervical insufficiency: laparoscopy or laparotomy?

James F Carter1, David E Soper, Laura M Goetzl, J Peter Van Dorsten.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of traditional abdominal cerclage (AC) with laparoscopic cerclage (LC). STUDY
DESIGN: Eligible women had at least 1 second trimester pregnancy loss due to cervical insufficiency, and had undergone at least 1 failed transvaginal cerclage. A prospective cohort of patients undergoing LC was compared with a historical control group of patients who had AC. A successful primary outcome was defined as delivery of a viable infant with neonatal survival.
RESULTS: We were able to evaluate 19 pregnancies following unique abdominal cerclage placement, 12 laparoscopic and 7 at the time of laparotomy. Nine of 12 (75%) undergoing LC and 5 of 7 (71%) pregnancies undergoing AC successfully delivered a viable infant (P = .63). LC during pregnancy was successful in 4 of 5 (80%) cases as compared to 3 of 5 (60%) cases with AC during pregnancy (P = 1.0).
CONCLUSION: Operative laparoscopy is a safe and effective alternative to laparotomy for the placement of abdominal cerclage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19576376     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.05.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  10 in total

1.  Difficulty in the management of pregnancy after vaginal radical trachelectomy.

Authors:  Sakura Takada; Shin-Ichi Ishioka; Toshiaki Endo; Tsuyoshi Baba; Miyuki Morishita; Yushi Akashi; Masahito Mizuuchi; Hidefumi Adachi; Miseon Kim; Tsuyoshi Saito
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Laparoscopic placement of cervical cerclage.

Authors:  Olga A Tusheva; Sarah L Cohen; Thomas F McElrath; Jon I Einarsson
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012

3.  Abdominal cerclage revisited.

Authors:  Devendra Arora; Navneet Magon; Manash Biswas; S Chopra
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2012-01-18

4.  Minimally invasive abdominal cerclage compared to laparotomy: a comparison of surgical and obstetric outcomes.

Authors:  Soorin Kim; Amanda Hill; Gulden Menderes; Sarah Cross; Masoud Azodi; Mert Ozan Bahtiyar
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-07-18

5.  Therapeutic effect and safety of laparoscopic cervical cerclage for treatment of cervical insufficiency in first trimester or non-pregnant phase.

Authors:  Yuqing Chen; Huashan Liu; Jiayu Gu; Shuzhong Yao
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-05-15

6.  Laparoscopic Cerclage as a Treatment Option for Cervical Insufficiency.

Authors:  D Bolla; L Raio; S Imboden; M D Mueller
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.915

7.  Laparoscopic removal of abdominal cerclage at 19 weeks' gestation.

Authors:  James F Carter; Ashlyn Savage; David E Soper
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2013 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

8.  Laparoscopic fertility sparing management of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Chiara Facchini; Giuseppina Rapacchia; Giulia Montanari; Paolo Casadio; Gianluigi Pilu; Renato Seracchioli
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-03-09

9.  Successful term delivery cases of trans-abdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage performed at more than 18 weeks of gestation.

Authors:  Eun-Joo Joung; Eun-Byeol Go; Jae Young Kwack; Yong Soon Kwon
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2016-07-13

10.  Successful Pregnancy Outcome after Laparoscopic Cerclage in a Patient with Cervicovaginal Fistula.

Authors:  Giovanni Zanconato; Valentino Bergamini; Silvia Baggio; Elena Cavaliere; Massimo Franchi
Journal:  Case Rep Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-10-25
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.