Literature DB >> 19576150

Comparison of oral versus injectable vitamin-D for the treatment of nutritional vitamin-D deficiency rickets.

Abdul Gaffar Billoo1, Ghulam Murtaza, M Ashraf Memon, Sultan Ahmed Khaskheli, Khalid Iqbal, Masood Hussain Rao.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and acceptability of a single dose of vitamin-D versus the efficacy of injectable Vitamin-D versus oral vitamin-D. STUDY
DESIGN: Case control. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: It was carried out at the Department of Paediatrics, Kharadar General Hospital, Karachi, from August 2003 to April 2004.
METHODOLOGY: Children of the age of 6 months to 3 years with clinical, biochemical and radiological evidence of vitamin- D deficiency rickets were included. The history, clinical examination, complete blood picture, serum calcium. Phosphorus, alkaline phosphatase and X-ray of wrist joint were done. The children were divided into two groups A and B. Group A was given oral vitamin-D and group B was given intramuscular injection of vitamin-D on the first day and then they were followed for two more visits at 30 and 90 days with clinical, biochemical and radiological examinations to assess the outcome.
RESULTS: There were 50 confirmed cases of rickets in each group. The mean age was 10.9+5.1 months and 14.7+8.1 months in group A and B respectively. In these children, clinical features were weakness, difficulty in walking, frontal bossing, ribcage deformity and widening of wrist were seen. After one dose of vitamin-D (cholecalciferol), there was appreciable gain of weight and height and raised levels of alkaline phosphatase became normal during follow-up. Radiological florid rickets and non-florid rickets in both groups healed clinically during follow-up period. Oral and injectable forms of vitamin-D (cholecalciferol) were effective but injectable form was shown to be statistically significant. There were no undesirable side effects and both forms of treatment were well-tolerated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19576150     DOI: 07.2009/JCPSP.428431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Coll Physicians Surg Pak        ISSN: 1022-386X            Impact factor:   0.711


  5 in total

1.  Vitamin D deficiency remains prevalent despite increased laboratory testing in New South Wales, Australia.

Authors:  Paul Quaggiotto; Huy Tran; Marie Bhanugopan
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.858

2.  Increment in vitamin D level and bone mineral accrual in children with vitamin D deficiency.

Authors:  Yashwant Kumar Rao; Tanu Midha; Satyajeet Singh; Anurag Bajpai; Amita Tilak
Journal:  Korean J Pediatr       Date:  2016-07-31

3.  Efficacy and Safety of 90,000 IU versus 300,000 IU Single Dose Oral Vitamin D in Nutritional Rickets: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Medha Mittal; Vineeta Yadav; Rajesh Khadgawat; Manish Kumar; Poonam Sherwani
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec

Review 4.  Iranian consensus on use of vitamin D in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Soodeh Razeghi Jahromi; Mohammad Ali Sahraian; Mansoureh Togha; Behnaz Sedighi; Vahid Shayegannejad; Alireza Nickseresht; Shahriar Nafissi; Niayesh Mohebbi; Nastran Majdinasab; Mohsen Foroughipour; Masoud Etemadifar; Nahid Beladi Moghadam; Hormoz Ayramlou; Fereshteh Ashtari; Shekoofe Alaie
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 2.474

5.  Vitamin D Supplementation for Patients with Dry Eye Syndrome Refractory to Conventional Treatment.

Authors:  Seok Hyun Bae; Young Joo Shin; Ha Kyoung Kim; Joon Young Hyon; Won Ryang Wee; Shin Goo Park
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.