Literature DB >> 19575737

Laparoscopic excision of rectovaginal endometriosis: report of a prospective study and review of the literature.

G D Maytham1, H M Dowson, B Levy, A Kent, T A Rockall.   

Abstract

AIM: The surgical management of rectovaginal endometriosis is challenging. We present our experience of the laparoscopic management of these difficult cases, together with a review of the current literature.
METHOD: A prospective database was established for all patients undergoing surgery for Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis (DIE) with rectovaginal and/or ureteric and bladder nodules. Outcomes analysed include operation performed, conversion and complication rates, and length of stay. These outcomes were compared with other laparoscopic rectal resections for alternative diagnoses recorded in the database and with outcomes seen in a literature review of studies on the surgical management of endometriosis.
RESULTS: Between April 2004 and November 2007, 54 patients underwent laparoscopic excision of rectovaginal endometriosis by a combined colorectal and gynaecological surgical team. Out of the 54 patients, 37% of patients underwent a rectal wall shave, 13% had a disc excision of the rectal wall, and 50% underwent segmental resection. There was a conversion rate of 4%, median duration of stay was 3 days, with 2% requiring transfusion. Major complications occurred in 7% of patients, with 4% requiring reoperation. Patients undergoing segmental resection for endometriosis had a higher complication rate than those having surgery for other diagnoses. There was an increased incidence of anastomotic stenosis, with histopathological results suggesting that the disease process might have contributed to this occurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic resection of rectovaginal endometriosis may be associated with a higher incidence of complications than resections performed for other diagnoses.
© 2010 The Authors. Colorectal Disease © 2010 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19575737     DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01993.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  7 in total

1.  Comparison between standard and reverse laparoscopic techniques for rectovaginal endometriosis.

Authors:  William Kondo; Nicolas Bourdel; Kris Jardon; Stefano Tamburro; Daniele Cavoli; Sachiko Matsuzaki; Revaz Botchorishvili; Benoit Rabischong; Jean L Pouly; Gérard Mage; Michel Canis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Surgical Therapy of Endometriosis: Challenges and Controversies.

Authors:  S Rimbach; U Ulrich; K W Schweppe
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  Limited segmental rectal resection in the treatment of deeply infiltrating rectal endometriosis: 10 years' experience from a tertiary referral unit.

Authors:  James English; Muhammad S Sajid; Jenney Lo; Guy Hudelist; Mirza K Baig; William A Miles
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2014-08-21

4.  Rectovaginal fistula following surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis: Does lesion size matter?

Authors:  Yunxi Zheng; Ning Zhang; Weiqi Lu; Liang Zhang; Shouxin Gu; Ying Zhang; Xiaofang Yi; Keqin Hua
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 1.671

5.  Clinical Outcome after Colonic Resection in Women with Endometriosis.

Authors:  Bettina Klugsberger; Andreas Shamiyeh; Peter Oppelt; Christina Jabkowski; Wolfgang Schimetta; Dietmar Haas
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Is a bowel resection necessary for deep endometriosis with rectovaginal or colorectal involvement?

Authors:  Pedro Acién; Clara Núñez; Francisco Quereda; Irene Velasco; Marta Valiente; Virginia Vidal
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2013-07-29

7.  Conservative surgery versus colorectal resection in deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Horace Roman; Michael Bubenheim; Emmanuel Huet; Valérie Bridoux; Chrysoula Zacharopoulou; Emile Daraï; Pierre Collinet; Jean-Jacques Tuech
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 6.918

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.