Literature DB >> 19575269

Should guidelines incorporate evidence on patient preferences?

Craig A Umscheid.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2009        PMID： 19575269      PMCID： PMC2710483          DOI： 10.1007/s11606-009-1055-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN： 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


× No keyword cloud information.
  17 in total

1.  Paternalism or partnership? Patients have grown up-and there's no going back.

Authors:  A Coulter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-18

2.  Involving patients in medical decisions: how can physicians do better?

Authors:  M J Barry
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999 Dec 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project.

Authors: 
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-02

4.  The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States.

Authors:  Elizabeth A McGlynn; Steven M Asch; John Adams; Joan Keesey; Jennifer Hicks; Alison DeCristofaro; Eve A Kerr
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Reassessment of clinical practice guidelines: go gently into that good night.

Authors:  Terrence M Shaneyfelt; Robert M Centor
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Shared decision making: have we missed the obvious?

Authors:  Janice L Hanson
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-07-14

7.  GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

Authors:  Gordon H Guyatt; Andrew D Oxman; Gunn E Vist; Regina Kunz; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Holger J Schünemann
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-04-26

8.  Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics.

Authors:  C H Braddock; K A Edwards; N M Hasenberg; T L Laidley; W Levinson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999 Dec 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  A simplified approach to the treatment of uncomplicated hypertension: a cluster randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Ross D Feldman; Guang Y Zou; Margaret K Vandervoort; Cindy J Wong; Sigrid A E Nelson; Brian G Feagan
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 10.190

10.  Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions.

Authors:  Karine Gravel; France Légaré; Ian D Graham
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2006-08-09       Impact factor: 7.327
View more
  6 in total

1.  High methodologic quality but poor applicability: assessment of the AAOS guidelines using the AGREE II instrument.

Authors:  Sanjeeve Sabharwal; Nirav K Patel; Salman Gauher; Ian Holloway; Thanos Athanasiou; Thanos Athansiou
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Which is the best current guideline for the diagnosis and management of cystic pancreatic neoplasms? An appraisal using evidence-based practice methods.

Authors:  Alexis M Cahalane; Y M Purcell; L P Lavelle; S H McEvoy; E R Ryan; E O'Toole; D E Malone
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  The use of research evidence on patient preferences in pharmaceutical coverage decisions and clinical practice guideline development: exploratory study into current state of play and potential barriers.

Authors:  Cecile M A Utens; Trudy van der Weijden; Manuela A Joore; Carmen D Dirksen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Appraising the methodological quality of the clinical practice guideline for diabetes mellitus using the AGREE II instrument: a methodological evaluation.

Authors:  Mahmoud Radwan; Ali Akbari Sari; Arash Rashidian; Amirhossein Takian; Sanaa Abou-Dagga; Aymen Elsous
Journal:  JRSM Open       Date:  2017-01-01

5.  Integrating evidence on patient preferences in healthcare policy decisions: protocol of the patient-VIP study.

Authors:  Carmen D Dirksen; Cecile Ma Utens; Manuela A Joore; Teus A van Barneveld; Bert Boer; Dunja Hh Dreesens; Hans van Laarhoven; Cees Smit; Anne M Stiggelbout; Trudy van der Weijden
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 7.327

6.  "They Should Be Asking Us": A Qualitative Decisional Needs Assessment for Women Considering Cervical Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Brianne Wood; Virginia L Russell; Ziad El-Khatib; Susan McFaul; Monica Taljaard; Julian Little; Ian D Graham
Journal:  Glob Qual Nurs Res       Date:  2018-07-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.