Literature DB >> 19574869

Is ultrasound guidance superior to conventional nerve stimulation for coracoid infraclavicular brachial plexus block?

Manuel Taboada1, Jaime Rodríguez, Marcos Amor, Sergi Sabaté, Julian Alvarez, Joaquín Cortés, Peter G Atanassoff.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In different peripheral nerve blocks, it has been speculated that needle guidance by ultrasound improves onset time and success rate compared with the more frequently used nerve stimulation-guided technique. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that ultrasound guidance improves onset time of coracoid infraclavicular brachial plexus block (IBPB) when compared with a nerve stimulation-guided technique.
METHODS: Seventy patients scheduled for hand or forearm surgery were randomly assigned to receive coracoid IBPB using either ultrasound guidance (group U, n = 35), or nerve stimulation (group S, n = 35). Patients were assessed for sensory and motor block every 5 mins after injection of local anesthetic. Onset time, the primary end point, was defined as the time required for complete sensory and motor block. Time required to perform the block, success rate, and time to resolution of motor blockade were also recorded (secondary end points).
RESULTS: Onset of complete sensory and motor blockade was similar in the 2 groups (17 mins [8 mins] in group U and 19 mins [8 mins] in group S; P = 0.321). Time required to perform the block was shorter in group U (3 mins [1 min]) as compared with group S (6 mins [2 mins]; P < 0.0001). No differences were observed in success rate (89% in group U and 91% in group S; P = 0.881) and time to resolution of motor blockade (237 mins [45 mins] in group U and 247 mins [57 mins] in group S; P = 0.418).
CONCLUSIONS: The present investigation demonstrates that ultrasound guidance and nerve stimulation provide similar onset time, success rate, and duration of motor blockade for coracoid IBPB; however, ultrasound guidance reduces the time required to perform the block.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19574869     DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181ac7c19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med        ISSN: 1098-7339            Impact factor:   6.288


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of the coracoid and retroclavicular approaches for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block.

Authors:  Nilgun Kavrut Ozturk; Ali Sait Kavakli
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 2.  Ultrasound guidance for upper and lower limb blocks.

Authors:  Sharon R Lewis; Anastasia Price; Kevin J Walker; Ken McGrattan; Andrew F Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-11

3.  Ultrasound guidance for deep peripheral nerve blocks: a brief review.

Authors:  Anupama Wadhwa; Sunitha Kanchi Kandadai; Sujittra Tongpresert; Detlef Obal; Ralf Erich Gebhard
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2011-07-27

4.  Role of positioning posterior cord on coracoid approach brachial plexus block guided by nerve stimulator: Compared with guided by ultrasound.

Authors:  Wensheng He; Zhuo Liu; Zhenyu Wu; Wenchao Liu; Haijun Sun; Xiaochun Yang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  Prolonged nerve blockade in a patient treated with lithium.

Authors:  Amit Lehavi; Boris Shenderey; Yeshayahu Shai Katz
Journal:  Local Reg Anesth       Date:  2012-04-02

6.  Ultrasound does not shorten the duration of procedure but provides a faster sensory and motor block onset in comparison to nerve stimulator in infraclavicular brachial plexus block.

Authors:  Walid Trabelsi; Mondher Belhaj Amor; Mohamed Anis Lebbi; Chiheb Romdhani; Sami Dhahri; Mustapha Ferjani
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2013-04-22

7.  Low-dose ropivacaine for supraclavicular brachial plexus block combined with general anesthesia for successful postoperative analgesia: A case series.

Authors:  Toshio Iwata; Kazuyoshi Nakahashi; Satoki Inoue; Hitoshi Furuya
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2013-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.