Literature DB >> 19574793

Complications of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy--experience of 117 patients.

Xiaojian Yan1, Guangyi Li, Huilin Shang, Gang Wang, Lushi Chen, Yubin Han.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the combined surgical technique of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy (LRH + LPL) for cervical cancers and summarize our experiences in prevention and treatment of complications, so as to provide strategies to prevent and appropriately manage the complications that may occur during these procedures.
METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on LRH + LPL in 117 cases of cervical cancer with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages Ib (n = 96) and II a (n = 21) from August 1998 to December 2006. The intraoperative and postoperative complications were analyzed.
RESULTS: The overall conversion rate was 1.7% (2/117). Four patients had vessel injuries, 3 of which were treated laparoscopically. One patient had a common iliac vein laceration that could not be controlled laparoscopically after failing to deal with the injured branch of common iliac vein. Cystotomy occurred in 5 patients. One case of stage IIa with a bladder laceration longer than 3 cm was converted to laparotomy during the early stages of the learning curve. The remaining 4 were managed laparoscopically. Postoperative complications occurred in 38.5% (n = 45) of the patients, including 38 patients with urinary retention who exhibited complete resolution within 6 months by intermittent training and catheterization, 4 with lymphocyst who underwent conservation treatment, 1 with ureteral fistula that was treated by cystoscopic placement of double-J ureteral stents, 1 with mild adynamic bowel obstruction who received conservative management, and 1 with vesicovaginal fistula that was closed by conservative treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: With the continuous skilled laparoscopic technology, mastering the tips of prevention, and treatment of complications, LRH + LPL will be widely performed in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19574793     DOI: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181a79430

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  6 in total

1.  Systematic review of urological injury during caesarean section and hysterectomy.

Authors:  Gavin Wei; Frances Harley; Michael O'Callaghan; James Adshead; Derek Hennessey; Ned Kinnear
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 1.932

2.  Clinical observation of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Xiang-Hua Yin; Zhong-Qin Wang; Shi-Zhang Yang; Hong-Yan Jia; Min Shi
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-05-15

3.  Radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: laparoscopy versus laparotomy.

Authors:  Sarah E Taylor; William C McBee; Scott D Richard; Robert P Edwards
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2011 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

4.  Concurrent Learning Curves of 3-Dimensional and Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Using 2-Dimensional Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy as a Benchmark: A Single Surgeon's Experience.

Authors:  Ding Ding; Hongyuan Jiang; Jichan Nie; Xishi Liu; Sun-Wei Guo
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-08-08

5.  Step-wise Technical Description of Performing Ureteric Tunnel Dissection in Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Dipak Limbachiya; Rashmi Kumari
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2021-11-05

6.  Total Laparoscopic Versus Laparotomic Radical Hysterectomy and Lymphadenectomy in Cervical Cancer: An Observational Study of 13-Year Experience.

Authors:  Meizhu Xiao; Zhenyu Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.889

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.