Literature DB >> 19574786

Comparison of the hybrid capture II assay with the human papillomavirus DNA chip test for the detection of high-grade cervical lesions.

Woo Dae Kang1, Cheol Hong Kim, Moon Kyoung Cho, Jong Woon Kim, Yoon Ha Kim, Ho Sun Choi, Seok Mo Kim.   

Abstract

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 is used as the threshold for treatment decisions. This study was conducted to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the Hybrid Capture II assay (HC2) and the human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA chip test (HDC) for detecting HPV in high-grade cervical lesions CIN2 or greater, including adenocarcinoma (CIN2+). Seven hundred forty-one women with abnormal cervical cytology were evaluated with the HC2, the HDC, and histological assessment of the cervix. The overall agreement of the 2 HPV tests was 88.8% (kappa value, 0.61). Of 615 high-risk HPV-positive specimens by the HC2, 571 (92.8%) were HDC-positive. Both tests were performed similarly on CIN2+ samples; the sensitivities of the HC2 and HDC as predictors of CIN2+ were 93.4 and 92.6%, respectively. In 83 cases of discrepancies between the HC2 and HDC, genotyping of 39 HC2-negative/HDC-positive cases revealed 13 HPV-53, 8 HPV-58, 7 HPV-16, 6 HPV-18, 2 HPV-68, 1 HPV-31, 1 HPV-45, and 1 HPV-66. In 515 patients with CIN2+, HPV-16 (45.0%) was the most common type; the next most common types were HPV-58 (20.8%), HPV-18 (16.1%), HPV-31 (6.6%), and HPV-33 (6.6%). Human papillomavirus types 16, 58, and 18 were more likely associated with CIN2+ (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the HDC is a reliable diagnostic tool for the detection of CIN2+. In addition, the HDC provides useful information regarding viral genotypes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19574786     DOI: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181a832a2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  6 in total

Review 1.  Human Papillomavirus Laboratory Testing: the Changing Paradigm.

Authors:  Eileen M Burd
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 2.  Is 58% sensitivity for detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 and invasive cervical cancer optimal for cervical screening?

Authors:  R Marshall Austin; Chengquan Zhao
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 2.091

3.  Comparison of cervical cancer screening results among 256,648 women in multiple clinical practices.

Authors:  Amy J Blatt; Ronald Kennedy; Ronald D Luff; R Marshall Austin; Douglas S Rabin
Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Limitations of widely used high-risk human papillomavirus laboratory-developed testing in cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Sonya Naryshkin; R Marshall Austin
Journal:  Drug Healthc Patient Saf       Date:  2012-11-02

5.  Limitations of widely used high-risk human papillomavirus laboratory-developed testing in cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Keith V Nance
Journal:  Drug Healthc Patient Saf       Date:  2013-01-21

6.  Clinical Significance of an HPV DNA Chip Test with Emphasis on HPV-16 and/or HPV-18 Detection in Korean Gynecological Patients.

Authors:  Min-Kyung Yeo; Ahwon Lee; Soo Young Hur; Jong Sup Park
Journal:  J Pathol Transl Med       Date:  2016-06-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.