G Ertem1, A Koçer. 1. Department of Gynecology, Obstetric, Ege University Odemis School of Health, Izmir, Turkey. gul.ertem@ege.edu.tr
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The second leading cause of death due to cancer in Turkey is breast cancer, which accounts for 24% of female cancers. AIMS: To determine the practices of nurses and midwives and their attitude toward breast self-examination (BSE). SETTING AND DESIGN: The descriptive survey was conducted to determine the practices of nurses and midwives and their attitude toward BSE. It tried to cover the total population rather than sampling part of it. However, 15 nurses and midwives, where there were errors detected in their data coding papers, and who did not accept to join the study, were excluded from the study. A total of 80 nurses and midwives were included in the study group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This survey was carried out at the State Hospital, all Public Health Cabins, and Family Health Centers, in the rural area of Izmir, a city located in the western region of Turkey. The data was collected between 15 March and 1 April 2004. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The analysis included descriptive statistics, to examine the association between BSE and medical history, knowledge of BSE, and attitude toward BSE. RESULTS: The results of the study indicated that 52% of the sample performed BSE. Approximately 35% of those who performed BSE reported that they acquired information regarding BSE during their work experience. A significant relationship was found between higher levels of work experience and BSE practice. Except for age, no significant relation was found between the sociodemographic factors and BSE practice. The sample showed a strong belief in the breast lump being the cause of breast cancer and it had a significant correlation with BSE practice. CONCLUSION: A positive correlation was found between nursing work experience and their practice alongside BSE medical professionals. Almost all the nurses and midwives knew how to conduct BSE, but did not prioritize practicing it.
BACKGROUND: The second leading cause of death due to cancer in Turkey is breast cancer, which accounts for 24% of female cancers. AIMS: To determine the practices of nurses and midwives and their attitude toward breast self-examination (BSE). SETTING AND DESIGN: The descriptive survey was conducted to determine the practices of nurses and midwives and their attitude toward BSE. It tried to cover the total population rather than sampling part of it. However, 15 nurses and midwives, where there were errors detected in their data coding papers, and who did not accept to join the study, were excluded from the study. A total of 80 nurses and midwives were included in the study group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This survey was carried out at the State Hospital, all Public Health Cabins, and Family Health Centers, in the rural area of Izmir, a city located in the western region of Turkey. The data was collected between 15 March and 1 April 2004. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The analysis included descriptive statistics, to examine the association between BSE and medical history, knowledge of BSE, and attitude toward BSE. RESULTS: The results of the study indicated that 52% of the sample performed BSE. Approximately 35% of those who performed BSE reported that they acquired information regarding BSE during their work experience. A significant relationship was found between higher levels of work experience and BSE practice. Except for age, no significant relation was found between the sociodemographic factors and BSE practice. The sample showed a strong belief in the breast lump being the cause of breast cancer and it had a significant correlation with BSE practice. CONCLUSION: A positive correlation was found between nursing work experience and their practice alongside BSE medical professionals. Almost all the nurses and midwives knew how to conduct BSE, but did not prioritize practicing it.
Authors: Kelechi Elizabeth Oladimeji; Joyce M Tsoka-Gwegweni; Franklin C Igbodekwe; Mary Twomey; Christopher Akolo; Hadiza Sabuwa Balarabe; Olayinka Atilola; Oluwole Jegede; Olanrewaju Oladimeji Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-11-25 Impact factor: 3.240