| Literature DB >> 19574251 |
Cornelia Mrosk1, Susanne Forner, Gerd Hause, Helge Küster, Joachim Kopka, Bettina Hause.
Abstract
Composite plants consisting of a wild-type shoot and a transgenic root are frequently used for functional genomics in legume research. Although transformation of roots using Agrobacterium rhizogenes leads to morphologically normal roots, the question arises as to whether such roots interact with arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi in the same way as wild-type roots. To address this question, roots transformed with a vector containing the fluorescence marker DsRed were used to analyse AM in terms of mycorrhization rate, morphology of fungal and plant subcellular structures, as well as transcript and secondary metabolite accumulations. Mycorrhization rate, appearance, and developmental stages of arbuscules were identical in both types of roots. Using Mt16kOLI1Plus microarrays, transcript profiling of mycorrhizal roots showed that 222 and 73 genes exhibited at least a 2-fold induction and less than half of the expression, respectively, most of them described as AM regulated in the same direction in wild-type roots. To verify this, typical AM marker genes were analysed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR and revealed equal transcript accumulation in transgenic and wild-type roots. Regarding secondary metabolites, several isoflavonoids and apocarotenoids, all known to accumulate in mycorrhizal wild-type roots, have been found to be up-regulated in mycorrhizal in comparison with non-mycorrhizal transgenic roots. This set of data revealed a substantial similarity in mycorrhization of transgenic and wild-type roots of Medicago truncatula, validating the use of composite plants for studying AM-related effects.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19574251 PMCID: PMC2736893 DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erp220
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Bot ISSN: 0022-0957 Impact factor: 6.992
Fig. 1.Mycorrhization 5 weeks after inoculation of wild-type and transgenic roots of M. truncatula. To generate transgenic roots, root transformation was performed using A. rhizogenes carrying pRedRoot. For analysis of transgenic roots, only roots with strong red fluorescence have been selected. (A) Degree of colonization as determined from ink-stained roots according to Trouvelot . F%, frequency of colonization in the root system; M%, intensity of the mycorrhizal colonization in the root system; A%, arbuscule abundance in the root system; m%, density of colonization in mycorrhizal root fragments; and a%, arbuscule abundance in the mycorrhizal root part. For each parameter, the mean ±SD is shown (n=6). (B and C) Representative semi-thin cross-sections of mycorrhizal wild-type (B) and transgenic (C) roots showing fungal structures in the inner cortex. The intercellular space contains numerous hyphae (arrows). Bars represent 20 μm. (D and E) Representative confocal images of the arbuscule developmental stages in wild-type (D) and transgenic (E) roots visualized by staining with acid fuchsin. For each, (i) a young, developing arbuscule (characterized by small size and restricted dichotomous branching); (ii) a fully developed arbuscule (exhibiting extensive branching and almost completely filling the host cortical cell); and (iii) a degenerating arbuscule (characterized by septa formed on arbuscule branches) is shown. Bars represent 20 μm.
Fig. 2.Representative transmission electron micrographs of mycorrhizal wild-type (A, C, and E) and transgenic (B, D, and F) roots. To generate transgenic roots, root transformation was performed using A. rhizogenes carrying pRedRoot. For analysis of transgenic roots, only roots with strong red fluorescence have been selected. (A and B) Cortex cells harbouring a functional arbuscule with well-separated hyphal structures (arrow) in near proximity to the plant cell nucleus (n). (C and D) Details of arbuscular branches. Note the organelle-rich plant cytoplasm surrounding each arbuscule branch, which is enclosed by the periarbuscular membrane (arrow). (E and F) Degenerating arbuscules. Note the collapsed fungal cell walls (arrow) clearly separated from the plant cytoplasm containing organelles such as mitochondria (m). Bars represent 5 μm in A, B, and 1 μm in C–F.
Expression of selected mycorrhiza-specific and mycorrhiza-induced marker genes deduced from microarrays and validated by real-time RT-PCR
| Oligo-ID | DFCI MtGI8 Annotation | Annotation | M-value, transgenic roots | M-value, wild-type roots | ΔΔCt, transgenic roots | ΔΔCt, wild-type roots |
| MT009707 | TC94453 UP|Q8GSG4 (Q8GSG4) Phosphate transporter PT4, complete | 1.37 | 5.06 | 14.49 | 13.65 | |
| MT015668 | TC96500 weakly similar to UP|Q9LUM8 (Q9LUM8) Blue copper-binding protein-like, partial (38%) | 1.42 | 2.68 | 8.20 | 8.13 | |
| MT009704 | TC95018 UP|Q84XR7 (Q84XR7) Germin-like protein 1, complete | 1.92 | 4.29 | 9.92 | 7.65 | |
| MT009185 | TC106954 similar to UP|PRTP_HUMAN (P10619) Lysosomal protective protein precursor (Cathepsin A) (Carboxypeptidase C) (Protective protein for beta-galactosidase), partial (16%) | 1.97 | 4.46 | 6.61 | 6.73 | |
| MT007813 | TC94919 homologue to UP|Q76FS3 (Q76FS3) Beta-tubulin, partial (98%) | 2.07 | 2.20 | 2.77 | 2.52 | |
| MT003520 | TC95567 similar to UP|P93536 (P93536) Bark lectin II precursor (LECSJABMII) (B-SJA-II) (Fragment), partial (40%) | 2.27 | 5.20 | 11.69 | 8.16 | |
| MT009013 | TC100720 UP|Q8H1Y6 (Q8H1Y6) Glutathione- | 3.54 | 5.86 | 11.48 | 7.66 | |
| MT014645 | TC101060 weakly similar to PIR|S66221|S66221 defensin AMP1– | 4.10 | 5.34 | 15.44 | 9.23 | |
| MT015000 | TC112474 | 4.44 | 4.34 | 11.57 | 10.70 | |
| – | – | – | – | 17.30 | 15.83 |
M-values representing the fold induction deduced from array hybridization [log2 expression ratios (P ≤0.05) of four individual mycorrhizal transgenic roots in comparison with two non-mycorrhizal transgenic roots (pooled)] are from transgenic roots 3 weeks post-inoculation. Data for wild-type roots are from Hohnjec and were obtained 4 weeks post-inoculation. ΔΔCt values were obtained by comparing the mean value of mycorrhizal roots with non-mycorrhizal roots for transgenic and wild-type roots, both 5 weeks post-inoculation. Statistical analyses were performed with Student's t-test, resulting in P ≤0.05 (n=4).
Oligo ID, identifier of M. truncatula 70mer oligonucleotides.
Mycorrhiza specific.
Mycorrhiza induced.
Analysis of mycorrhiza-specific and mycorrhiza-induced secondary metabolites from mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal roots of M. truncatula
| Metabolite | λmax (nm) | x-fold (myc/non-myc), transgenic | x-fold (myc/non-myc), wild-type | ||
| Ononin | 37.96 | 251, 300sh | 0.00004 | 2.83 | 3.52 |
| Malonylononin | 45.23 | 257, 300sh | 0.00127 | 1.79 | 2.45 |
| 13-Hydroxyblumenol C 9- | 21.28 | 246 | – | myc-spec | myc-spec |
| Blumenol C 9- | 27.96 | 243 | – | myc-spec | myc-spec |
| Blumenol C 9- | 37.49 | 245 | – | myc-spec | myc-spec |
| Mycorradicin derivative 3 | 44.31 | 281, 360sh, 378, 397sh | – | myc-spec | myc-spec |
| Yellow pigment | 45.52–53.51 | 315, 360sh, 382, 404 | – | myc-spec | myc-spec |
Metabolites were identified by their retention time (Rt) and absorption maxima (λmax) according to Schliemann . Isoflavonoids exhibited significantly increased levels in mycorrhizal roots compared with non-mycorrhizal roots, whereas apocarotenoids not occurring in non-mycorrhizal roots are described as mycorrhiza-specific (myc-spec). All plants were analysed 5 weeks after inoculation with G. intraradices (n=7).