Literature DB >> 19574065

A clinical comparison of two different double plating methods for intraarticular distal humerus fractures.

Sang-Jin Shin1, Hoon-Sang Sohn, Nam-Hoon Do.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study compared clinical outcomes in patients with intraarticular distal humerus fractures treated using 2 different double plating methods.
METHOD: Seventeen patients were treated by perpendicular plating (group I) and 18 by parallel plating (group II) methods. Arc of flexion averaged 106 degrees +/-23 degrees in group I and 112 degrees +/-19 degrees in group II.
RESULTS: Eleven patients in group I recovered full arc of flexion and 13 patients in group II achieved full arc of flexion. All patients obtained bone union, except 2 patients in group I. Nonunion in these patients developed in the supracondylar area. Complications developed in 6 patients in group I and in 8 in group II. No significant differences were found between the clinical outcomes of the 2o plating methods.
CONCLUSION: Although more patients failed to achieve bony union in the perpendicular plating group, both parallel and orthogonal plates positioning can provide adequate stability and anatomic reconstruction of the distal humerus fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19574065     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  36 in total

1.  Bicolumnar 90-90 plating of low-energy distal humeral fractures in the elderly patient.

Authors:  Daniel F Leigey; Dana J Farrell; Peter A Siska; Ivan S Tarkin
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2014-09

2.  Biomechanical study of different plate configurations for distal humerus osteosynthesis.

Authors:  M Bogataj; F Kosel; R Norris; M Krkovic; M Brojan
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-02-08       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Biomechanical evaluation of metacarpal fracture fixation: application of a 90° internal fixation model.

Authors:  Andrew J Watt; Randal P Ching; Jerry I Huang
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2015-03

4.  Shear fractures of the distal humerus: Is the use of intra-articular screws a safe treatment?

Authors:  L Tarallo; R Mugnai; R Adani; F Zambianchi; C A Costanzini; F Catani
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2015-10-29

Review 5.  [Intra-articular fractures of the distal humerus : aspects of fracture treatment in geriatric patients].

Authors:  T G Gerich
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 6.  Elbow hemiarthroplasty for the management of distal humeral fractures: current technique, indications and results.

Authors:  Joideep Phadnis; Adam C Watts; Gregory I Bain
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2016-04-21

Review 7.  Intra-articular fractures of the distal humerus-a review of the current practice.

Authors:  Charalampos G Zalavras; Efthymios Papasoulis
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Evaluation of risk factors for stiffness after distal humerus plating.

Authors:  Onur Tunalı; Ali Erşen; Tuna Pehlivanoğlu; Serkan Bayram; Ata C Atalar; Mehmet Demirhan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Midterm clinical and radiological outcomes of the surgical treatment of complex AO type C distal humeral fractures with two different double plate fixation techniques.

Authors:  K Ditsios; S I Stavridis; P Savvidis; H Dinopoulos; G Petsatodis
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 0.471

10.  Biomechanical testing of a new plate system for the distal humerus compared to two well-established implants.

Authors:  Christine Voigt; Christina Rank; Klaus Waizner; Robert Wendlandt; Andreas Unger; Arndt P Schulz; Christian Jürgens; Felix Renken
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.