Literature DB >> 19573774

Quality of care indicators for prostate cancer: progress toward consensus.

David C Miller1, Christopher S Saigal.   

Abstract

Previously-documented variations in patterns of care and patient outcomes suggest differences in the quality of care provided to men with prostate cancer. Herein we describe ongoing efforts to measure the quality of prostate cancer care, including the development and pilot-testing of the RAND prostate cancer quality indicators and the selection of the consensus-based Physician Performance Measurement Set for Prostate Cancer. We also summarize current payer-led initiatives aimed at measuring quality of care for men with prostate cancer. We conclude that currently-available prostate cancer quality indicators are derived from valid, consensus-based methodologies and capture clinical practices that are necessary for high-quality care in early-stage prostate cancer. Despite this promise, however, the currently available measures have several limitations that should be considered during their implementation in prostate cancer quality assessment and improvement activities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19573774     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.01.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  7 in total

1.  The importance of quality indicators: a call to action.

Authors:  Larry Goldenberg; John Trachtenberg; Fred Saad
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  The Role of Provider Characteristics in the Selection of Surgery or Radiation for Localized Prostate Cancer and Association With Quality of Care Indicators.

Authors:  Raj Satkunasivam; Mary Lo; Mariana Stern; Inderbir S Gill; Steven Fleming; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Roger T Anderson; Trevor D Thompson; Ann S Hamilton
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.339

Review 3.  Racial variation in the pattern and quality of care for prostate cancer in the USA: mind the gap.

Authors:  Daniel A Barocas; David F Penson
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  National consensus quality indicators to assess quality of care for active surveillance in low-risk prostate cancer: An evidence-informed, modified Delphi survey of Canadian urologists/radiation oncologists.

Authors:  Narhari Timilshina; Antonio Finelli; George Tomlinson; Anna Gagliardi; Beate Sander; Shabbir M H Alibhai
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Variation in quality of care among older men with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ravishankar Jayadevappa; Sumedha Chhatre; Jerry C Johnson; S Bruce Malkowicz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Automating the Determination of Prostate Cancer Risk Strata From Electronic Medical Records.

Authors:  Justin R Gregg; Maximilian Lang; Lucy L Wang; Matthew J Resnick; Sandeep K Jain; Jeremy L Warner; Daniel A Barocas
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2017-06-08

Review 7.  The crossroads of evidence-based medicine and health policy: implications for urology.

Authors:  Jeremy B Shelton; Christopher S Saigal
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 4.226

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.