Literature DB >> 19573733

Quantification of myocardial flow reserve using positron emission imaging the journey to clinical use.

Rob S B Beanlands1, Maria Cecilia Ziadi, Kathryn Williams.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2009        PMID： 19573733     DOI： 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.03.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN： 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


× No keyword cloud information.
  10 in total

1.  A combined static-dynamic single-dose imaging protocol to compare quantitative dynamic SPECT with static conventional SPECT.

Authors:  Maria Sciammarella; Uttam M Shrestha; Youngho Seo; Grant T Gullberg; Elias H Botvinick
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Early insights of cardiac risk and treatment response with quantitative PET monitoring of coronary-specific endothelial dysfunction and myocardial perfusion reserve.

Authors:  Ronald G Schwartz
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Coronary vasomotor function assessed by positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Nagara Tamaki; Keiichiro Yoshinaga; Masanao Naya
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb positron emission tomography: clinical validation with 15O-water.

Authors:  John O Prior; Gilles Allenbach; Ines Valenta; Marek Kosinski; Cyrill Burger; Francis R Verdun; Angelika Bischof Delaloye; Philipp A Kaufmann
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  Assessment of myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve with positron emission tomography in ischemic heart disease: current state and future directions.

Authors:  Firas Al Badarin; Ahmed Aljizeeri; Fatimah Almasoudi; Mouaz H Al-Mallah
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.214

6.  Dependency of cardiac rubidium-82 imaging quantitative measures on age, gender, vascular territory, and software in a cardiovascular normal population.

Authors:  John J Sunderland; Xiao-Bo Pan; Jerome Declerck; Yusuf Menda
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Comparison of two software systems for quantification of myocardial blood flow in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Hulya Yalcin; Ines Valenta; Min Zhao; Abdel Tahari; Dai-Yin Lu; Takahiro Higuchi; Fatih Yalcin; Nagehan Kucukler; Yalda Soleimanifard; Yun Zhou; Martin G Pomper; Theodore P Abraham; Ben Tsui; Martin A Lodge; Thomas H Schindler; M Roselle Abraham
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 8.  CFR and FFR assessment with PET and CTA: strengths and limitations.

Authors:  Ryo Nakazato; Ran Heo; Jonathon Leipsic; James K Min
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Myocardial perfusion imaging with PET.

Authors:  Ryo Nakazato; Daniel S Berman; Erick Alexanderson; Piotr Slomka
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2013-02-01

10.  Coronary artery and thoracic aorta calcification is inversely related to coronary flow reserve as measured by ⁸²Rb PET/CT in intermediate risk patients.

Authors:  Jongho Kim; Paco E Bravo; Ali Gholamrezanezhad; Seil Sohn; Ash Rafique; Arlene Travis; Josef Machac
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 5.952
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.