Literature DB >> 19573186

Using mixed methods research in medical education: basic guidelines for researchers.

Karen E Schifferdecker1, Virginia A Reed.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Mixed methods research involves the collection, analysis and integration of both qualitative and quantitative data in a single study. The benefits of a mixed methods approach are particularly evident when studying new questions or complex initiatives and interactions, which is often the case in medical education research. Basic guidelines for when to use mixed methods research and how to design a mixed methods study in medical education research are not readily available.
METHODS: The purpose of this paper is to remedy that situation by providing an overview of mixed methods research, research design models relevant for medical education research, examples of each research design model in medical education research, and basic guidelines for medical education researchers interested in mixed methods research.
CONCLUSIONS: Mixed methods may prove superior in increasing the integrity and applicability of findings when studying new or complex initiatives and interactions in medical education research. They deserve an increased presence and recognition in medical education research.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19573186     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03386.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  55 in total

1.  Applications of mixed-methods methodology in clinical pharmacy research.

Authors:  Muhammad Abdul Hadi; S José Closs
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2016-06

2.  Translation of an Action Learning Collaborative Model Into a Community-Based Intervention to Promote Physical Activity and Healthy Eating.

Authors:  Karen E Schifferdecker; Anna M Adachi-Mejia; Rebecca L Butcher; Sharon O'Connor; Zhigang Li; Dorothy A Bazos
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2015-08-27

3.  The impact of the Virtual Ophthalmology Clinic on medical students' learning: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  T Succar; G Zebington; F Billson; K Byth; S Barrie; P McCluskey; J Grigg
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Medical Residents' Attitudes Towards Interprofessional Learning and Stereotypes Following Sonography Student-Led Point-of-Care Ultrasound Training.

Authors:  Christopher J Smith; Tabatha Matthias; Elizabeth Beam; Kathryn Wampler; Lea Pounds; Devin Nickol; Ronald J Shope; Kristy Carlson; Kimberly Michael
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Development and Initial Validation of the PROMIS®-Plus-HF Profile Measure.

Authors:  Faraz S Ahmad; Michael A Kallen; Karen E Schifferdecker; Kathleen L Carluzzo; Susan E Yount; Jill M Gelow; Peter A McCullough; Stephen E Kimmel; Elliot S Fisher; David Cella
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 8.790

6.  What are the perceived learning needs of Australian general practice registrars for quality prescribing?

Authors:  Rola Ajjawi; Jill E Thistlethwaite; Parisa Aslani; Nick B Cooling
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  A method to create a standardized generic and condition-specific patient-reported outcome measure for patient care and healthcare improvement.

Authors:  Karen E Schifferdecker; Susan E Yount; Karen Kaiser; Anna Adachi-Mejia; David Cella; Kathleen L Carluzzo; Amy Eisenstein; Michael A Kallen; George J Greene; David T Eton; Elliott S Fisher
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Foster and Adoptive Parent Perspectives on Needs and Services: a Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Erin R Barnett; Mary K Jankowski; Rebecca L Butcher; Catherine Meister; Rebecca R Parton; Robert E Drake
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.505

9.  Individualized feedback during simulated laparoscopic training:a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Liv Ahlborg; Maria Weurlander; Leif Hedman; Henry Nisel; Pelle G Lindqvist; Li Felländer-Tsai; Lars Enochsson
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2015-07-29

10.  The Impact of Converting From an 'Educator-Driven' to a 'Learner-Initiated' Feedback Model.

Authors:  Britany L Raymond; Leslie C Fowler; Amy C Robertson
Journal:  J Educ Perioper Med       Date:  2019-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.