Literature DB >> 19573114

Comparing hormonal and symptomatic responses to experimental hypoglycaemia in insulin- and sulphonylurea-treated Type 2 diabetes.

P Choudhary1, K Lonnen, C J Emery, I A MacDonald, K M MacLeod, S A Amiel, S R Heller.   

Abstract

AIMS: Patients with diabetes rely on symptoms to identify hypoglycaemia. Previous data suggest patients with Type 2 diabetes develop greater symptomatic and hormonal responses to hypoglycaemia at higher glucose concentrations than non-diabetic controls and these responses are lowered by insulin treatment. It is unclear if this is as a result of insulin therapy itself or improved glucose control. We compared physiological responses to hypoglycaemia in patients with Type 2 diabetes patients treated with sulphonylureas (SUs) or insulin (INS) with non-diabetic controls (CON).
METHODS: Stepped hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemic clamps were performed on 20 subjects with Type 2 diabetes, 10 SU-treated and 10 treated with twice-daily premixed insulin, and 10 age- and weight-matched non-diabetic controls. Diabetic subjects were matched for diabetes duration, glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) and hypoglycaemia experience. We measured symptoms, counterregulatory hormones and cognitive function at glucose plateaux of 5, 4, 3.5, 3 and 2.5 mmol/l.
RESULTS: Symptomatic responses to hypoglycaemia occurred at higher blood glucose concentrations in SU-treated than INS-treated patients [3.5 (0.4) vs. 2.6 (0.5) mmol/l SU vs. INS; P = 0.001] or controls [SU vs. CON 3.5 (0.4) vs. 3.0 (0.6) mmol/l; P = 0.05]. They also had a greater increase in symptom scores at hypoglycaemia [13.6 (11.3) vs. 3.6 (6.1) vs. 5.1 (4.3) SU vs. INS vs. CON; P = 0.017]. There were no significant differences in counterregulatory hormone responses or impairment of cognitive function among groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Sulphonylurea-treated subjects are more symptomatic of hypoglycaemia at a higher glucose level than insulin-treated subjects. This may protect them from severe hypoglycaemia but hinder attainment of glycaemic goals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19573114     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02759.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabet Med        ISSN: 0742-3071            Impact factor:   4.359


  4 in total

1.  Experimental non-severe hypoglycaemia substantially impairs cognitive function in type 2 diabetes: a randomised crossover trial.

Authors:  Malin Nilsson; Nicole Jensen; Michael Gejl; Marianne L Bergmann; Heidi Storgaard; Mette Zander; Kamilla Miskowiak; Jørgen Rungby
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 2.  Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease: Is intensive glucose control beneficial or deadly? Lessons from ACCORD, ADVANCE, VADT, UKPDS, PROactive, and NICE-SUGAR.

Authors:  Guntram Schernthaner
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2010-01

3.  Glucose concentrations of less than 3.0 mmol/l (54 mg/dl) should be reported in clinical trials: a joint position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 10.122

4.  Restoration of self-awareness of hypoglycemia in adults with long-standing type 1 diabetes: hyperinsulinemic-hypoglycemic clamp substudy results from the HypoCOMPaSS trial.

Authors:  Lalantha Leelarathna; Stuart A Little; Emma Walkinshaw; Horng Kai Tan; Alexandra Lubina-Solomon; Kavita Kumareswaran; Annette P Lane; Thomas Chadwick; Sally M Marshall; Jane Speight; Daniel Flanagan; Simon R Heller; James A M Shaw; Mark L Evans
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 19.112

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.