Literature DB >> 19572140

Biomechanical comparison of screw-in suture anchor-suture combinations used for Bankart repair.

Brad S Sparks1, John Nyland, Akbar Nawab, Ethan Blackburn, Ryan Krupp, David N M Caborn.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Bankart repair laxity may contribute to pathologic joint instability. This biomechanical study compared two screw-in suture anchor-suture combinations under tensile loads.
METHODS: Twelve pairs of scapulae were implanted with either a 3 mm diameter, 14 mm long poly-L/D-lactide suture anchor with a suture eyelet (Group 1) or a 3.1 mm diameter, 11 mm long polylactide suture anchor with a molded eyelet (Group 2). Constructs were cyclically loaded between 25 and 50 N with a 25 N load increase every 25 cycles.
RESULTS: Group 2 displayed greater displacement at failure, had more specimens with > or =2 mm displacement by the 50 N interval (P = 0.014), and had displaced more by 100 N (P < or = 0.046). Group 1 displayed a stronger load-displacement at failure relationship than Group 2 (r (2) = 0.67 vs. r (2) = 0.37).
CONCLUSION: Construct differences may influence decisions regarding the required number of suture anchor-suture loops, the rehabilitation timetable, and the timing of return to unrestricted activities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19572140     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-009-0926-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  1 in total

1.  Biomechanical evaluation of knotless anterior and posterior Bankart repairs.

Authors:  Frank Martetschläger; Max P Michalski; Kyle S Jansson; Coen A Wijdicks; Peter J Millett
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 4.342

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.