C J Currie1, C D Poole, E A M Gale. 1. School of Medicine, Cardiff University, The Pharma Research Centre, Cardiff MediCentre, Cardiff, CF14 4UJ, UK. currie@cardiff.ac.uk
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The risk of developing a range of solid tumours is increased in type 2 diabetes, and may be influenced by glucose-lowering therapies. We examined the risk of development of solid tumours in relation to treatment with oral agents, human insulin and insulin analogues. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of people treated in UK general practices. Those included in the analysis developed diabetes >40 years of age, and started treatment with oral agents or insulin after 2000. A total of 62,809 patients were divided into four groups according to whether they received monotherapy with metformin or sulfonylurea, combined therapy (metformin plus sulfonylurea), or insulin. Insulin users were grouped according to treatment with insulin glargine, long-acting human insulin, biphasic analogue and human biphasic insulin. The outcome measures were progression to any solid tumour, or cancer of the breast, colon, pancreas or prostate. Confounding factors were accounted for using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Metformin monotherapy carried the lowest risk of cancer. In comparison, the adjusted HR was 1.08 (95% CI 0.96-1.21) for metformin plus sulfonylurea, 1.36 (95% CI 1.19-1.54) for sulfonylurea monotherapy, and 1.42 (95% CI 1.27-1.60) for insulin-based regimens. Adding metformin to insulin reduced progression to cancer (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.43-0.66). The risk for those on basal human insulin alone vs insulin glargine alone was 1.24 (95% CI 0.90-1.70). Compared with metformin, insulin therapy increased the risk of colorectal (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.23-2.33) or pancreatic cancer (HR 4.63, 95% CI 2.64-8.10), but did not influence the risk of breast or prostate cancer. Sulfonylureas were associated with a similar pattern of risk as insulin. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Those on insulin or insulin secretagogues were more likely to develop solid cancers than those on metformin, and combination with metformin abolished most of this excess risk. Metformin use was associated with lower risk of cancer of the colon or pancreas, but did not affect the risk of breast or prostate cancer. Use of insulin analogues was not associated with increased cancer risk as compared with human insulin.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The risk of developing a range of solid tumours is increased in type 2 diabetes, and may be influenced by glucose-lowering therapies. We examined the risk of development of solid tumours in relation to treatment with oral agents, humaninsulin and insulin analogues. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of people treated in UK general practices. Those included in the analysis developed diabetes >40 years of age, and started treatment with oral agents or insulin after 2000. A total of 62,809 patients were divided into four groups according to whether they received monotherapy with metformin or sulfonylurea, combined therapy (metformin plus sulfonylurea), or insulin. Insulin users were grouped according to treatment with insulin glargine, long-acting humaninsulin, biphasic analogue and humanbiphasic insulin. The outcome measures were progression to any solid tumour, or cancer of the breast, colon, pancreas or prostate. Confounding factors were accounted for using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS:Metformin monotherapy carried the lowest risk of cancer. In comparison, the adjusted HR was 1.08 (95% CI 0.96-1.21) for metformin plus sulfonylurea, 1.36 (95% CI 1.19-1.54) for sulfonylurea monotherapy, and 1.42 (95% CI 1.27-1.60) for insulin-based regimens. Adding metformin to insulin reduced progression to cancer (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.43-0.66). The risk for those on basal humaninsulin alone vs insulin glargine alone was 1.24 (95% CI 0.90-1.70). Compared with metformin, insulin therapy increased the risk of colorectal (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.23-2.33) or pancreatic cancer (HR 4.63, 95% CI 2.64-8.10), but did not influence the risk of breast or prostate cancer. Sulfonylureas were associated with a similar pattern of risk as insulin. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Those on insulin or insulin secretagogues were more likely to develop solid cancers than those on metformin, and combination with metformin abolished most of this excess risk. Metformin use was associated with lower risk of cancer of the colon or pancreas, but did not affect the risk of breast or prostate cancer. Use of insulin analogues was not associated with increased cancer risk as compared with humaninsulin.
Authors: James D Lewis; Rita Schinnar; Warren B Bilker; Xingmei Wang; Brian L Strom Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Dean T Eurich; Finlay A McAlister; David F Blackburn; Sumit R Majumdar; Ross T Tsuyuki; Janice Varney; Jeffrey A Johnson Journal: BMJ Date: 2007-08-30
Authors: Steven S Coughlin; Eugenia E Calle; Lauren R Teras; Jennifer Petrelli; Michael J Thun Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2004-06-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Kay-Tee Khaw; Nicholas Wareham; Sheila Bingham; Robert Luben; Ailsa Welch; Nicholas Day Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Elizabeth A Spencer; Kirstin L Pirie; Richard J Stevens; Valerie Beral; Anna Brown; Bette Liu; Jane Green; Gillian K Reeves Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2008-11-18 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Marni Stott-Miller; Chu Chen; Shu-Chun Chuang; Yuan-Chin Amy Lee; Stefania Boccia; Hermann Brenner; Gabriela Cadoni; Luigino Dal Maso; Carlo La Vecchia; Philip Lazarus; Fabio Levi; Keitaro Matsuo; Hal Morgenstern; Heiko Müller; Joshua Muscat; Andrew F Olshan; Mark P Purdue; Diego Serraino; Thomas L Vaughan; Zuo-Feng Zhang; Paolo Boffetta; Mia Hashibe; Stephen M Schwartz Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2011-12-05 Impact factor: 4.254