BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although normalization of brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) to individual shear stress (FMD:shear stress ratio) has been proposed to improve this measure of endothelial function, the clinical utility of FMD normalization has not yet been demonstrated. We tested (1) whether following conventional 5-min forearm occlusion, the FMD:shear stress ratio would discriminate a population with moderate cardiovascular risk (MR) from a low-risk (LR) population, and (2) whether the dose-response profile relating shear stress to FMD would be different between the 2 populations. METHODS: Five different magnitudes of reactive hyperemia-induced shear stress were applied to 20 MR and 20 LR subjects by manipulating forearm cuff occlusion duration. Brachial artery diameters and velocities were measured via high-resolution ultrasound. To quantify the hyperemic stimulus, shear stress area under the curve was individually calculated for the duration of time-to-peak dilation. RESULTS: Following 5-min of forearm occlusion, FMD:shear stress ratio (p = 0.041), but not FMD (p = 0.286), discriminated MR from LR. The slope of the shear stress-FMD regression line was lower in MR compared to the LR (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The FMD:shear stress ratio distinguished reduced endothelial function in a population with MR. The dose-response profile of the shear stress-FMD relationship appears to differ between populations of distinct cardiovascular risk. Copyright 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although normalization of brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) to individual shear stress (FMD:shear stress ratio) has been proposed to improve this measure of endothelial function, the clinical utility of FMD normalization has not yet been demonstrated. We tested (1) whether following conventional 5-min forearm occlusion, the FMD:shear stress ratio would discriminate a population with moderate cardiovascular risk (MR) from a low-risk (LR) population, and (2) whether the dose-response profile relating shear stress to FMD would be different between the 2 populations. METHODS: Five different magnitudes of reactive hyperemia-induced shear stress were applied to 20 MR and 20 LR subjects by manipulating forearm cuff occlusion duration. Brachial artery diameters and velocities were measured via high-resolution ultrasound. To quantify the hyperemic stimulus, shear stress area under the curve was individually calculated for the duration of time-to-peak dilation. RESULTS: Following 5-min of forearm occlusion, FMD:shear stress ratio (p = 0.041), but not FMD (p = 0.286), discriminated MR from LR. The slope of the shear stress-FMD regression line was lower in MR compared to the LR (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The FMD:shear stress ratio distinguished reduced endothelial function in a population with MR. The dose-response profile of the shear stress-FMD relationship appears to differ between populations of distinct cardiovascular risk. Copyright 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Authors: Dick H J Thijssen; Mark A Black; Kyra E Pyke; Jaume Padilla; Greg Atkinson; Ryan A Harris; Beth Parker; Michael E Widlansky; Michael E Tschakovsky; Daniel J Green Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2010-10-15 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Vienna E Brunt; Matthew J Howard; Michael A Francisco; Brett R Ely; Christopher T Minson Journal: J Physiol Date: 2016-06-30 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Jaume Padilla; Colin N Young; Grant H Simmons; Shekhar H Deo; Sean C Newcomer; John P Sullivan; M Harold Laughlin; Paul J Fadel Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2010-02-12 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Thales C Barbosa; Jasdeep Kaur; Brandi Y Stephens; John D Akins; David M Keller; R Matthew Brothers; Paul J Fadel Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2018-08-17 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Tinoy J Kizhakekuttu; David D Gutterman; Shane A Phillips; Jason W Jurva; Emily I L Arthur; Emon Das; Michael E Widlansky Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2010-07-29
Authors: Bethany Barone Gibbs; Devon A Dobrosielski; Michael Lima; Susanne Bonekamp; Kerry J Stewart; Jeanne M Clark Journal: Vasc Med Date: 2011-06-27 Impact factor: 3.239