Literature DB >> 19571548

Comparison of acceleration and impact stress as possible loading factors in phonation: a computer modeling study.

Jaromír Horácek1, Anne-Maria Laukkanen, Petr Sidlof, Peter Murphy, Jan G Svec.   

Abstract

Impact stress (the impact force divided by the contact area of the vocal folds) has been suspected to be the main traumatizing mechanism in voice production, and the main cause of vocal fold nodules. However, there are also other factors, such as the repetitive acceleration and deceleration, which may traumatize the vocal fold tissues. Using an aeroelastic model of voice production, the present study quantifies the acceleration and impact stress values in relation to lung pressure, fundamental frequency (F0) and prephonatory glottal half-width. Both impact stress and acceleration were found to increase with lung pressure. Compared to impact stress, acceleration was less dependent on prephonatory glottal width and, thus, on voice production type. Maximum acceleration values were about 5-10 times greater for high F0 (approx. 400 Hz) compared to low F0 (approx. 100 Hz), whereas maximum impact stress remained nearly unchanged. This suggests that acceleration, i.e. the inertia forces, may present at high F0 a greater load for the vocal folds, and in addition to the collision forces may contribute to the fact that females develop vocal fold nodules and other vocal fold traumas more frequently than males. Copyright 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19571548     DOI: 10.1159/000219949

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop        ISSN: 1021-7762            Impact factor:   0.849


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of Vocal Vibration-Dose Measures for Potential-Damage Risk Criteria.

Authors:  Ingo R Titze; Eric J Hunter
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  A canonical biomechanical vocal fold model.

Authors:  Pinaki Bhattacharya; Thomas H Siegmund
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 2.009

3.  Vocal tract adjustments to minimize vocal fold contact pressure during phonation.

Authors:  Zhaoyan Zhang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 2.482

4.  A computational study of systemic hydration in vocal fold collision.

Authors:  Pinaki Bhattacharya; Thomas Siegmund
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 1.763

5.  Biomechanical simulation of vocal fold dynamics in adults based on laryngeal high-speed videoendoscopy.

Authors:  Michael Döllinger; Pablo Gómez; Rita R Patel; Christoph Alexiou; Christopher Bohr; Anne Schützenberger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Vocal Behavior of Teachers Reading with Raised Voice in a Noisy Environment.

Authors:  Manfred Nusseck; Anna Immerz; Bernhard Richter; Louisa Traser
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  Direct measurement and modeling of intraglottal, subglottal, and vocal fold collision pressures during phonation in an individual with a hemilaryngectomy.

Authors:  Daryush D Mehta; James B Kobler; Steven M Zeitels; Matías Zañartu; Emiro J Ibarra; Gabriel A Alzamendi; Rodrigo Manriquez; Byron D Erath; Sean D Peterson; Robert H Petrillo; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  Appl Sci (Basel)       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 2.838

8.  Morphometric Differences of Vocal Tract Articulators in Different Loudness Conditions in Singing.

Authors:  Matthias Echternach; Fabian Burk; Michael Burdumy; Louisa Traser; Bernhard Richter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Bayesian Inference of Vocal Fold Material Properties from Glottal Area Waveforms Using a 2D Finite Element Model.

Authors:  Paul J Hadwin; Mohsen Motie-Shirazi; Byron D Erath; Sean D Peterson
Journal:  Appl Sci (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-06       Impact factor: 2.679

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.