Literature DB >> 19571086

Postoperative incomplete reduction of the sesamoids as a risk factor for recurrence of hallux valgus.

Ryuzo Okuda1, Mitsuo Kinoshita, Toshito Yasuda, Tsuyoshi Jotoku, Naoshi Kitano, Hiroaki Shima.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether postoperative incomplete reduction of the sesamoids is a risk factor for the recurrence of hallux valgus. The purpose of the present study was to clarify the relationship between the postoperative relative sesamoid position and the recurrence of hallux valgus.
METHODS: Dorsoplantar weight-bearing radiographs of sixty normal feet (the control group) and sixty-five feet with hallux valgus (the hallux valgus group) in a study of adult women were reviewed. The feet in the hallux valgus group were treated with a proximal metatarsal osteotomy, and the radiographs were assessed preoperatively, at the early follow-up interval (at a mean of 3.1 months), and at the most recent follow-up interval (at a mean of forty-five months). The position of the medial sesamoid was classified with a grading system ranging from I through VII as described by Hardy and Clapham. In the feet with hallux valgus, we defined a grade of IV or less as the normal position of the medial sesamoid (the normal-position group) and grade V or greater as lateral displacement of the sesamoid (the displacement group).
RESULTS: Fifty feet (83%) in the control group were classified as grade IV or less and ten, as grade V. All feet in the hallux valgus group were classified as grade V or greater preoperatively, forty-eight feet (74%) were classified as grade IV or less at the early follow-up evaluation, and forty-two feet (65%) were classified as grade IV or less at the most recent follow-up evaluation. The average hallux valgus angle in the hallux valgus group was 38.3 degrees (range, 25 degrees to 60 degrees ) preoperatively, 11.9 degrees (range, 4 degrees to 28 degrees ) at the time of the early follow-up, and 13.9 degrees (range, 0 degrees to 33 degrees ) at the time of the most recent follow-up. There was no significant difference in the average hallux valgus angle between the early and most recent follow-up evaluations in the feet that were considered to be in the normal-position group at the time of the early follow-up (p = 0.084). In the feet that were considered to be in the displacement group at the time of the early follow-up, the average hallux valgus angle at the time of the most recent follow-up was significantly greater than that at the time of the early follow-up (19.5 degrees +/- 8.4 degrees compared with 15.0 degrees +/- 5.8 degrees ) (p = 0.0082). The feet that were in the displacement group at the time of the early follow-up had a greater risk of having recurrence of the hallux valgus at that time than did those in the normal-position group (odds ratio, 10.0; 95% confidence interval, 2.75 to 36.33).
CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative incomplete reduction of the sesamoids can be a risk factor for the recurrence of hallux valgus. The identification of incomplete reduction of the sesamoids intraoperatively may allow modification of surgical procedures and improvement of the surgical results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19571086     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00796

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  20 in total

1.  A minimally invasive technique for surgical treatment of hallux valgus: simple, effective, rapid, inexpensive (SERI).

Authors:  Sandro Giannini; Cesare Faldini; Matteo Nanni; Alberto Di Martino; Deianira Luciani; Francesca Vannini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  The Use of a Triplanar Metatarsal Rotational Osteotomy to Correct Hallux Valgus Deformities.

Authors:  Pablo Wagner; Emilio Wagner
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2019-12-12

Review 3.  Distal soft tissue procedure in hallux valgus surgery: biomechanical background and technique.

Authors:  Wolfgang Schneider
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Reliability and relationship of radiographic measurements in hallux valgus.

Authors:  Kyoung Min Lee; Soyeon Ahn; Chin Youb Chung; Ki Hyuk Sung; Moon Seok Park
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-04-28       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Comparing proximal and distal metatarsal osteotomy for moderate to severe hallux valgus.

Authors:  Bavornrit Chuckpaiwong
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Impact of podiatry resident experience level in hallux valgus surgery on postoperative outcomes.

Authors:  Adam E Fleischer; Martin C Yorath; Robert M Joseph; Adam Baron; Thomas Nordquist; Braden J Moore; Richmond C O Robinson; Charles H Reilly
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 2.192

7.  Sesamoid malalignment in hallux valgus: Radiographic and MRI measurements and their correlation with internal derangement findings of the first metatarsophalangeal joint.

Authors:  Justin Skweres; Avneesh Chhabra; Jed Hummel; Nathan Heineman; Riham Dessouky; Yin Xi; Lihua Zhang; Dane Wukich
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Endolog technique for correction of hallux valgus: a prospective study of 30 patients with 4-year follow-up.

Authors:  Carlo Biz; Marco Corradin; Ilaria Petretta; Roberto Aldegheri
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Functional and radiographic outcomes of hallux valgus correction by mini-invasive surgery with Reverdin-Isham and Akin percutaneous osteotomies: a longitudinal prospective study with a 48-month follow-up.

Authors:  Carlo Biz; Michele Fosser; Miki Dalmau-Pastor; Marco Corradin; Maria Grazia Rodà; Roberto Aldegheri; Pietro Ruggieri
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Effect of metatarsal osteotomy and open lateral soft tissue procedure on sesamoid position: radiological assessment.

Authors:  Young Rak Choi; Sang-June Lee; Jun Hyun Kim; Tae Ho Kim; Chi Hoon Oh
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.