Literature DB >> 19570814

Facilitating the participation of people with aphasia in research: a description of strategies.

Ruth Dalemans1, Derick T Wade, Wim J A van den Heuvel, Luc P de Witte.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: People with aphasia are often excluded from research because of their communication impairments, especially when an investigation into the communication impairment is not the primary goal. In our research concerning social participation of people with aphasia, we wanted to include people with mild, moderate as well as severe aphasia. AIM: To suggest strategies and techniques for research in people with aphasia based upon experiences in conducting research in this group of people.
METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study and a quantitative study in people with aphasia concerning their social participation. In these studies different strategies were developed based upon the literature, conversations with people with aphasia and speech and language therapists, to facilitate the inclusion of people with aphasia, even those with severe communication problems. Several strategies were evaluated. The strategies used and our experiences are outlined in this report. MAIN CONTRIBUTION: It is possible to conduct research in this group. Several strategies were helpful to make this mission possible: the use of pre-structured diaries, the use of in-depth interviews with attention to non-verbal communication, the use of existing measurements, adjusted for people with aphasia by: using pictograms, placing one question per page, bolding the key concepts in the question, using large font, visualizing the answering possibilities in words and in pictures, reducing the question length, and excluding negatives in the question.
CONCLUSION: Research in people with aphasia is possible when using strategies adjusted to the communicative impairment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19570814     DOI: 10.1177/0269215509337197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rehabil        ISSN: 0269-2155            Impact factor:   3.477


  17 in total

1.  Adherence to medication in stroke survivors dependent on caregivers.

Authors:  Anna De Simoni; Jonathan Mant; Stephen Sutton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Aphasia assessment and functional outcome prediction in patients with aphasia after stroke.

Authors:  Bernardo Gialanella
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Barriers to and Facilitators of Access and Participation in Community-Based Exercise Programmes from the Perspective of Adults with Post-stroke Aphasia.

Authors:  Diane C Blonski; Megan Covert; Roxanne Gauthier; Alanna Monas; Danielle Murray; Kelly K O'Brien; Anita Debbie Mendelson; Maria Huijbregts
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.037

4.  Development of a self-management intervention for stroke survivors with aphasia using co-production and behaviour change theory: An outline of methods and processes.

Authors:  Faye Wray; David Clarke; Madeline Cruice; Anne Forster
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Exploring the perspectives of key stakeholders on the design and delivery of a cognitive rehabilitation intervention for people post-stroke.

Authors:  Mairéad O' Donoghue; Pauline Boland; Siobhan Leahy; Rose Galvin; John McManus; Dominika Lisiecka; Sara Hayes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Development of a patient-centred, patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for post-stroke cognitive rehabilitation: qualitative interviews with stroke survivors to inform design and content.

Authors:  Emma L Patchick; Maria Horne; Kate Woodward-Nutt; Andy Vail; Audrey Bowen
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  The confidence of speech-language pathology students regarding communicating with people with aphasia.

Authors:  Emma Finch; Jennifer Fleming; Kyla Brown; Jennifer Lethlean; Ashley Cameron; Steven M McPhail
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  VOICES: the value of 6-month clinical evaluation in stroke. The protocol for a planned qualitative study to ascertain the value of stroke follow-up to people affected by stroke.

Authors:  Colin Jenkins; Fiona Price
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Who said dialogue conversations are easy? The communication between communication vulnerable people and health-care professionals: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Steffy E A Stans; Ruth J P Dalemans; Uta R Roentgen; Hester W H Smeets; Anna J H M Beurskens
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 10.  Longer-term needs of stroke survivors with communication difficulties living in the community: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Faye Wray; David Clarke
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.