Literature DB >> 19570317

Universal production patterns and ambient language influences in babbling: a cross-linguistic study of Korean- and English-learning infants.

Sue Ann S Lee1, Barbara Davis, Peter Macneilage.   

Abstract

The phonetic characteristics of canonical babbling produced by Korean- and English-learning infants were compared with consonant and vowel frequencies observed in infant-directed speech produced by Korean- and English-speaking mothers. For infant output, babbling samples from six Korean-learning infants were compared with an existing English babbling database (Davis & MacNeilage, 1995). For ambient language comparisons, consonants and vowels in ten Korean and ten English infant-directed speech (IDS) samples were analyzed. The two infant groups demonstrated similar consonant patterns, but showed different vowel patterns from one another. For both languages, infant vowel patterns were related to those of ambient language IDS. Ambient language patterns were manifested in infant vowel output, perhaps because vowels are more perceptually and motorically available in the input and output capacities of babbling infants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19570317     DOI: 10.1017/S0305000909009532

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Child Lang        ISSN: 0305-0009


  10 in total

1.  Exposure to a second language in infancy alters speech production.

Authors:  Megha Sundara; Nancy Ward; Barbara Conboy; Patricia K Kuhl
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2020-01-29

2.  Subtlety of Ambient-Language Effects in Babbling: A Study of English- and Chinese-Learning Infants at 8, 10, and 12 Months.

Authors:  Chia-Cheng Lee; Yuna Jhang; Li-Mei Chen; George Relyea; D Kimbrough Oller
Journal:  Lang Learn Dev       Date:  2016-06-06

3.  Biomechanically preferred consonant-vowel combinations fail to appear in adult spoken corpora.

Authors:  D H Whalen; Sara Giulivi; Hosung Nam; Andrea G Levitt; Pierre Hallé; Louis M Goldstein
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.500

4.  Adding a fourth rater to three had little impact in pre-linguistic outcome classification.

Authors:  Christina Persson; Elizabeth J Conroy; Carrol Gamble; Anna Rosala-Hallas; William Shaw; Elisabeth Willadsen
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 1.346

5.  Cross-linguistic comparison of utterance shapes in Korean- and English-learning children: An ambient language effect.

Authors:  Seunghee Ha; Cynthia J Johnson; Kimbrough D Oller; Hyunjoo Yoo
Journal:  Infant Behav Dev       Date:  2021-01-20

Review 6.  Motherese in interaction: at the cross-road of emotion and cognition? (A systematic review).

Authors:  Catherine Saint-Georges; Mohamed Chetouani; Raquel Cassel; Fabio Apicella; Ammar Mahdhaoui; Filippo Muratori; Marie-Christine Laznik; David Cohen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  The development of sensorimotor influences in the audiovisual speech domain: some critical questions.

Authors:  Bahia Guellaï; Arlette Streri; H Henny Yeung
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-08-06

8.  Articulating What Infants Attune to in Native Speech.

Authors:  Catherine T Best; Louis M Goldstein; Hosung Nam; Michael D Tyler
Journal:  Ecol Psychol       Date:  2016-11-01

9.  Preferred sound groups of vocal iconicity reflect evolutionary mechanisms of sound stability and first language acquisition: evidence from Eurasia.

Authors:  Johannes Dellert; Niklas Erben Johansson; Johan Frid; Gerd Carling
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Simulating Speech Error Patterns Across Languages and Different Datasets.

Authors:  Sofia Strömbergsson; Jana Götze; Jens Edlund; Kristina Nilsson Björkenstam
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 1.500

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.