Literature DB >> 19569425

DNA behind bars: other ways of knowing forensic DNA technologies.

Barbara Prainsack1, Martin Kitzberger.   

Abstract

This paper explores 'other' ways of knowing DNA in the field of criminal investigation. Drawing upon 26 in-depth interviews with prisoners in Austria, it illustrates how this group knows and conceptualizes DNA traces and forensic DNA technologies. These understandings and conceptualizations are both nuanced and ambiguous. While on the one hand, DNA traces and forensic DNA technologies were not treated as categorically different from other types of traces and technologies in the prisoners' accounts, they were seen as 'unique' in one respect: respondents experienced DNA traces as beyond their control because they were virtually impossible to avoid (in contrast to, for example, fingerprints). Furthermore, the scientific rigour that our interviewees assumed to underpin forensic DNA technologies rendered these technologies as impenetrable and intimidating, and as effectively challenging many offenders' expert knowledge on how to manage crime scenes and avoid convictions. Finally, due to coming 'from the inside' of the body, forensic DNA technologies were seen as 'deepening' the stigma of delinquency in many of our interviewees' bodies and selves. For our interviewees, forensic DNA technologies assumed the role of institutionalized memories of their delinquency.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19569425     DOI: 10.1177/0306312708097289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Stud Sci        ISSN: 0306-3127            Impact factor:   3.885


  4 in total

1.  Do health and forensic DNA databases increase racial disparities?

Authors:  Peter A Chow-White; Troy Duster
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 2.  What influences public views on forensic DNA testing in the criminal field? A scoping review of quantitative evidence.

Authors:  Helena Machado; Susana Silva
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 4.639

3.  Criminal genomic pragmatism: prisoners' representations of DNA technology and biosecurity.

Authors:  Helena Machado; Susana Silva
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2012-06-25

4.  An inconvenient truth: More rigorous and ecologically valid research is needed to properly understand cognitive bias in forensic decisions.

Authors:  Lee J Curley; James Munro; Martin Lages
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Synerg       Date:  2020-02-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.