Literature DB >> 19569399

Genetics and the social science explanation of individual outcomes.

Jeremy Freese1.   

Abstract

Accumulating evidence from behavioral genetics suggests that the vast majority of individual-level outcomes of abiding sociological interest are genetically influenced to a substantial degree. This raises the question of the place of genetics in social science explanations. Genomic causation is described from a counterfactualist perspective, which makes its complexity plain and highlights the distinction between identifying causes and substantiating explanations. For explanation, genomic causes must be understood as strictly mediated by the body. One implication is that the challenge of behavioral genetics for sociology is much more a challenge from psychology than biology, and a main role for genetics is as a placeholder for ignorance of more proximate influences of psychological and other embodied variation. Social scientists should not take this challenge from psychology as suggesting any especially fundamental explanatory place for either it or genetics, but the contingent importance of genetic and psychological characteristics is itself available for sociological investigation.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19569399     DOI: 10.1086/592208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJS        ISSN: 0002-9602


  26 in total

Review 1.  Genetic influences on adolescent sexual behavior: Why genes matter for environmentally oriented researchers.

Authors:  K Paige Harden
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Multigenerational Approaches to Social Mobility. A Multifaceted Research Agenda.

Authors:  Fabian T Pfeffer
Journal:  Res Soc Stratif Mobil       Date:  2014-03-01

3.  Gene by Social-Environment Interaction for Youth Delinquency and Violence: Thirty-Nine Aggression-related Genes.

Authors:  Hexuan Liu; Yi Li; Guang Guo
Journal:  Soc Forces       Date:  2015

4.  Is the Association Between Education and Fertility Postponement Causal? The Role of Family Background Factors.

Authors:  Felix C Tropf; Jornt J Mandemakers
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2017-02

5.  Trust is heritable, whereas distrust is not.

Authors:  Martin Reimann; Oliver Schilke; Karen S Cook
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Opportunities and challenges of big data for the social sciences: The case of genomic data.

Authors:  Hexuan Liu; Guang Guo
Journal:  Soc Sci Res       Date:  2016-04-21

7.  Comparing Observed and Unobserved Components of Childhood: Evidence From Finnish Register Data on Midlife Mortality From Siblings and Their Parents.

Authors:  Hannes Kröger; Rasmus Hoffmann; Lasse Tarkiainen; Pekka Martikainen
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2018-02

8.  The Nature-Nurture Debate is Over, and Both Sides Lost! Implications for Understanding Gender Differences in Religiosity.

Authors:  Matt Bradshaw; Christopher G Ellison
Journal:  J Sci Study Relig       Date:  2009-06-01

9.  Integrating work from genetics and the social sciences: an introduction.

Authors:  Jason M Fletcher; Jason D Boardman
Journal:  Biodemography Soc Biol       Date:  2013

10.  Unemployment and suicide during and after a deep recession: a longitudinal study of 3.4 million Swedish men and women.

Authors:  Anthony M Garcy; Denny Vågerö
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.