Literature DB >> 19569375

Metapopulation responses to patch connectivity and quality are masked by successional habitat dynamics.

Jenny A Hodgson1, Atte Moilanen, Chris D Thomas.   

Abstract

Many species have to track changes in the spatial distribution of suitable habitat from generation to generation. Understanding the dynamics of such species will likely require spatially explicit models, and patch-based metapopulation models are potentially appropriate. However, relatively little attention has been paid to developing metapopulation models that include habitat dynamics, and very little to testing the predictions of these models. We tested three predictions from theory about the differences between dynamic habitat metapopulations and their static counterparts using long-term survey data from two metapopulations of the butterfly Plebejus argus. As predicted, we showed first that the metapopulation inhabiting dynamic habitat had a lower level of habitat occupancy, which could not be accounted for by other differences between the metapopulations. Secondly, we found that patch occupancy did not significantly increase with increasing patch connectivity in dynamic habitat, whereas there was a strong positive connectivity-occupancy relationship in static habitat. Thirdly, we found no significant relationship between patch occupancy and patch quality in dynamic habitat, whereas there was a strong, positive quality-occupancy relationship in static habitat. Modeling confirmed that the differences in mean patch occupancy and connectivity-occupancy slope could arise without changing the species' metapopulation parameters-importantly, without changing the dependence of colonization upon connectivity. We found that, for a range of landscape scenarios, successional simulations always produced a lower connectivity-occupancy slope than comparable simulations with static patches, whether compared like-for-like or controlling for mean occupancy. We conclude that landscape-scale studies may often underestimate the importance of connectivity for species occurrence and persistence because habitat turnover can obscure the connectivity-occupancy relationship in commonly available snapshot data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19569375     DOI: 10.1890/08-1227.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  10 in total

1.  The role of habitat quality in fragmented landscapes: a conceptual overview and prospectus for future research.

Authors:  Alessio Mortelliti; Giovanni Amori; Luigi Boitani
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Rapid viability analysis for metapopulations in dynamic habitat networks.

Authors:  Martin Drechsler; Karin Johst
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Perturbation drives changing metapopulation dynamics in a top marine predator.

Authors:  Emma L Carroll; Ailsa Hall; Morten Tange Olsen; Aubrie B Onoufriou; Oscar E Gaggiotti; Debbie Jf Russell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Influence of local and landscape factors on distributional dynamics: a species-centred, fitness-based approach.

Authors:  Aaron D Flesch
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  A unified framework for analysis of individual-based models in ecology and beyond.

Authors:  Stephen J Cornell; Yevhen F Suprunenko; Dmitri Finkelshtein; Panu Somervuo; Otso Ovaskainen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  The implications of habitat management on the population viability of the endangered Ohlone tiger beetle (Cicindela ohlone) metapopulation.

Authors:  Tara M Cornelisse; Michelle K Bennett; Deborah K Letourneau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Transient windows for connectivity in a changing world.

Authors:  Sara L Zeigler; William F Fagan
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 3.600

8.  Variability in primary productivity determines metapopulation dynamics.

Authors:  Néstor Fernández; Jacinto Román; Miguel Delibes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 9.  Old concepts, new challenges: adapting landscape-scale conservation to the twenty-first century.

Authors:  Lynda Donaldson; Robert J Wilson; Ilya M D Maclean
Journal:  Biodivers Conserv       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 3.549

10.  Species traits, patch turnover and successional dynamics: when does intermediate disturbance favour metapopulation occupancy?

Authors:  Frederico Mestre; Ricardo Pita; António Mira; Pedro Beja
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 2.964

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.