Literature DB >> 19569219

Oral sulfasalazine as a clinical BCRP probe substrate: pharmacokinetic effects of genetic variation (C421A) and pantoprazole coadministration.

Kimberly K Adkison1, Soniya S Vaidya, Daniel Y Lee, Seok Hwee Koo, Linghui Li, Amar A Mehta, Annette S Gross, Joseph W Polli, Joan E Humphreys, Yu Lou, Edmund J D Lee.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the utility of oral sulfasalazine as a probe substrate for Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP; ABCG2) activity by assessing the impact of genetic variation or coadministration of an inhibitor (pantoprazole) on plasma and urine pharmacokinetics of sulfasalazine and metabolites. Thirty-six healthy male subjects prescreened for ABCG2 421CC (reference activity), CA, and AA (lower activity) genotypes (N = 12 each) received a single 500 mg oral dose of enteric coated sulfasalazine alone, with 40 mg pantoprazole, or with 40 mg famotidine (gastrointestinal pH control) in a 3-period, single fixed sequence, crossover design. No significant difference in sulfasalazine or metabolite pharmacokinetics in 421AA or CA compared to 421CC subjects was found; however, high inter-subject variability was observed. Geometric mean (95% CI) sulfasalazine plasma AUC((0-infinity)) values were 32.1 (13.2, 78.1), 16.8 (7.15, 39.6) and 62.7 (33.4, 118) microg h/mL, and C(max) were 4.01 (1.62, 9.92), 1.70 (0.66, 4.40), and 6.86 (3.61, 13.0) microg/mL for CC, CA, and AA subjects, respectively. Pantoprazole and famotidine did not affect sulfasalazine pharmacokinetics in any genotypic cohort. These results suggest that the pharmacokinetics of oral, enteric-coated 500 mg sulfasalazine are not sufficiently sensitive to ABCG2 genetic variation or inhibitors to be useful as a clinical probe substrate of BCRP activity. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19569219     DOI: 10.1002/jps.21860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Sci        ISSN: 0022-3549            Impact factor:   3.534


  6 in total

Review 1.  Intestinal and hepatic drug transporters: pharmacokinetic, pathophysiological, and pharmacogenetic roles.

Authors:  Tomohiro Terada; Daiki Hira
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 2.  Renal Drug Transporters and Drug Interactions.

Authors:  Anton Ivanyuk; Françoise Livio; Jérôme Biollaz; Thierry Buclin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Role of the breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2) in drug transport--an update.

Authors:  Qingcheng Mao; Jashvant D Unadkat
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  Evaluation of the usefulness of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) knockout mice and BCRP inhibitor-treated monkeys to estimate the clinical impact of BCRP modulation on the pharmacokinetics of BCRP substrates.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Karibe; Rie Hagihara-Nakagomi; Koji Abe; Tomoki Imaoka; Tsuyoshi Mikkaichi; Satoru Yasuda; Masakazu Hirouchi; Nobuaki Watanabe; Noriko Okudaira; Takashi Izumi
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 5.  PharmGKB summary: very important pharmacogene information for ABCG2.

Authors:  Alison E Fohner; Deanna J Brackman; Kathleen M Giacomini; Russ B Altman; Teri E Klein
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Incorporating High-Throughput Exposure Predictions With Dosimetry-Adjusted In Vitro Bioactivity to Inform Chemical Toxicity Testing.

Authors:  Barbara A Wetmore; John F Wambaugh; Brittany Allen; Stephen S Ferguson; Mark A Sochaski; R Woodrow Setzer; Keith A Houck; Cory L Strope; Katherine Cantwell; Richard S Judson; Edward LeCluyse; Harvey J Clewell; Russell S Thomas; Melvin E Andersen
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 4.849

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.