Literature DB >> 19569183

An N log N approximation based on the natural organization of biomolecules for speeding up the computation of long range interactions.

Ramu Anandakrishnan1, Alexey V Onufriev.   

Abstract

Presented here is a method, the hierarchical charge partitioning (HCP) approximation, for speeding up computation of pairwise electrostatic interactions in biomolecular systems. The approximation is based on multiple levels of natural partitioning of biomolecular structures into a hierarchical set of its constituent structural components. The charge distribution in each component is systematically approximated by a small number of point charges, which, for the highest level component, are much fewer than the number of atoms in the component. For short distances from the point of interest, the HCP uses the full set of atomic charges available. For long-distance interactions, the approximate charge distributions with smaller sets of charges are used instead. For a structure consisting of N charges, the computational cost of computing the pairwise interactions via the HCP scales as O(N log N), under assumptions about the structural organization of biomolecular structures generally consistent with reality. A proof-of-concept implementation of the HCP shows that for large structures it can lead to speed-up factors of up to several orders of magnitude relative to the exact pairwise O(N(2)) all-atom computation used as a reference. For structures with more than 2000-3000 atoms the relative accuracy of the HCP (relative root-mean-square force error per atom), approaches the accuracy of the particle mesh Ewald (PME) method with parameter settings typical for biomolecular simulations. When averaged over a set of 600 representative biomolecular structures, the relative accuracies of the two methods are roughly equal. The HCP is also significantly more accurate than the spherical cutoff method. The HCP has been implemented in the freely available nucleic acids builder (NAB) molecular dynamics (MD) package in Amber tools. A 10 ns simulation of a small protein indicates that the HCP based MD simulation is stable, and that it can be faster than the spherical cutoff method. A critical benefit of the HCP approximation is that it is algorithmically very simple, and unlike the PME, the HCP is straightforward to use with implicit solvent models. (c) 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19569183      PMCID: PMC2818067          DOI: 10.1002/jcc.21357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Chem        ISSN: 0192-8651            Impact factor:   3.376


  52 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Modeling salt-mediated electrostatics of macromolecules: the discrete surface charge optimization algorithm and its application to the nucleosome.

Authors:  D A Beard; T Schlick
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.505

Review 3.  Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules.

Authors:  Martin Karplus; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2002-09

4.  Implicit solvation based on generalized Born theory in different dielectric environments.

Authors:  Michael Feig; Wonpil Im; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2004-01-08       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  An efficient hybrid explicit/implicit solvent method for biomolecular simulations.

Authors:  Michael S Lee; Freddie R Salsbury; Mark A Olson
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.376

6.  Molecular dynamics simulations of the complete satellite tobacco mosaic virus.

Authors:  Peter L Freddolino; Anton S Arkhipov; Steven B Larson; Alexander McPherson; Klaus Schulten
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.006

7.  Analysis of basic clustering algorithms for numerical estimation of statistical averages in biomolecules.

Authors:  Ramu Anandakrishnan; Alexey Onufriev
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.479

8.  Coarse-grained force field for the nucleosome from self-consistent multiscaling.

Authors:  Karine Voltz; Joanna Trylska; Valentina Tozzini; Vandana Kurkal-Siebert; Jörg Langowski; Jeremy Smith
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 3.376

9.  The implementation of a fast and accurate QM/MM potential method in Amber.

Authors:  Ross C Walker; Michael F Crowley; David A Case
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.376

10.  Generalized born model with a simple smoothing function.

Authors:  Wonpil Im; Michael S Lee; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 3.376

View more
  7 in total

1.  Accelerating electrostatic surface potential calculation with multi-scale approximation on graphics processing units.

Authors:  Ramu Anandakrishnan; Tom R W Scogland; Andrew T Fenley; John C Gordon; Wu-chun Feng; Alexey V Onufriev
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.518

2.  Implicit Solvent Model for Million-Atom Atomistic Simulations: Insights into the Organization of 30-nm Chromatin Fiber.

Authors:  Saeed Izadi; Ramu Anandakrishnan; Alexey V Onufriev
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 3.  Generalized Born Implicit Solvent Models for Biomolecules.

Authors:  Alexey V Onufriev; David A Case
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 12.981

4.  Speed of conformational change: comparing explicit and implicit solvent molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Ramu Anandakrishnan; Aleksander Drozdetski; Ross C Walker; Alexey V Onufriev
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Multi-dimensional characterization of electrostatic surface potential computation on graphics processors.

Authors:  Mayank Daga; Wu-Chun Feng
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Chromosome-nuclear envelope attachments affect interphase chromosome territories and entanglement.

Authors:  Nicholas Allen Kinney; Igor V Sharakhov; Alexey V Onufriev
Journal:  Epigenetics Chromatin       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 4.954

7.  Point charges optimally placed to represent the multipole expansion of charge distributions.

Authors:  Ramu Anandakrishnan; Charles Baker; Saeed Izadi; Alexey V Onufriev
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.