Literature DB >> 19567800

Evaluating healthcare information technology outside of academia: observations from the national resource center for healthcare information technology at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Eric G Poon1, Caitlin M Cusack, Julie J McGowan.   

Abstract

The National Resource Center for Health Information Technology (NRC) was formed in the fall of 2004 as part of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) health IT portfolio to support its grantees. One of the core functions of the NRC was to assist grantees in their evaluation efforts of Health IT. This manuscript highlights some common challenges experienced by health IT project teams at nonacademic institutions, including inappropriately scoped and resourced evaluation efforts, inappropriate choice of metrics, inadequate planning for data collection and analysis, and lack of consideration of qualitative methodologies. Many of these challenges can be avoided or overcome. The strategies adopted by various AHRQ grantees and the lessons learned from their projects should become part of the toolset for current and future implementers of health IT as the nation moves rapidly towards its widespread adoption.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19567800      PMCID: PMC2744713          DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M3033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  9 in total

1.  The use of information technology in improving medical performance. Part II. Physician-support tools.

Authors:  A A Gawande; D W Bates
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2000-02-14

2.  Medscape's response to the Institute of Medicine Report: Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century.

Authors:  M Leavitt
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2001-03-05

3.  The value of health care information exchange and interoperability.

Authors:  Jan Walker; Eric Pan; Douglas Johnston; Julia Adler-Milstein; David W Bates; Blackford Middleton
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2005 Jan-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 4.  Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care.

Authors:  Basit Chaudhry; Jerome Wang; Shinyi Wu; Margaret Maglione; Walter Mojica; Elizabeth Roth; Sally C Morton; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  The landscape of the AHRQ Health Information Technology Portfolio.

Authors:  Brian E Dixon
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

6.  Formative evaluation: a critical component in EHR implementation.

Authors:  Julie J McGowan; Caitlin M Cusack; Eric G Poon
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  The use of information technology in improving medical performance. Part III. Patient-support tools.

Authors:  A A Gawande; D W Bates
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2000-02-22

8.  A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care.

Authors:  Samuel J Wang; Blackford Middleton; Lisa A Prosser; Christiana G Bardon; Cynthia D Spurr; Patricia J Carchidi; Anne F Kittler; Robert C Goldszer; David G Fairchild; Andrew J Sussman; Gilad J Kuperman; David W Bates
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors.

Authors:  D W Bates; L L Leape; D J Cullen; N Laird; L A Petersen; J M Teich; E Burdick; M Hickey; S Kleefield; B Shea; M Vander Vliet; D L Seger
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-10-21       Impact factor: 56.272

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Actionable reminders did not improve performance over passive reminders for overdue tests in the primary care setting.

Authors:  Robert E El-Kareh; Tejal K Gandhi; Eric G Poon; Lisa P Newmark; Jonathan Ungar; E J Orav; Thomas D Sequist
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Evaluating health information technology in community-based settings: lessons learned.

Authors:  Lisa M Kern; Jessica S Ancker; Erika Abramson; Vaishali Patel; Rina V Dhopeshwarkar; Rainu Kaushal
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-07-31       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  Improving Evaluation to Address the Unintended Consequences of Health Information Technology:. a Position Paper from the Working Group on Technology Assessment & Quality Development.

Authors:  F Magrabi; E Ammenwerth; H Hyppönen; N de Keizer; P Nykänen; M Rigby; P Scott; J Talmon; A Georgiou
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2016-11-10

4.  Planning a holistic summative eHealth evaluation in an interdisciplinary and multi-national setting: a case study and propositions for guideline development.

Authors:  Monika Jurkeviciute; Amia Enam; Johanna Torres-Bonilla; Henrik Eriksson
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 2.796

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.