End-points and clinical trial design in pulmonary arterial hypertension: have we made progress?

There is enormous interest in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), so it is appropriate to consider the design of trials of new therapies and the end-points to be measured when trying to decide whether or not a therapy is effective. In May 2003, the first meeting devoted solely to the discussion of end-points and trial design in PAH was held in Gleneagles, UK. At that time, most of the randomised controlled trials in PAH had used 6-min walking distance and/or resting haemodynamics as their primary end-points. The present article considers the progress that has been made since 2003. It deals with aspects of clinical trial design (such as noninferiority, superiority and withdrawal trials), considers end-points used in previous and current studies (such as 6-min walking distance, time to clinical worsening, haemodynamics, imaging and plasma brain natriuretic peptide), and considers what end-points might be used in the future. The second end-points meeting was held in Turnberry, UK, in June 2007. It had a similar format to the first meeting. Much of what is presented here is a summary of the workshops from that meeting. An attempt has been made to both summarise the current state of end-points and trial design and suggest new ways in which they could be improved. The present article forms one of a series being published in the European Respiratory Journal on pulmonary hypertension.