INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to examine whether Enterococcus faecalis isolates from endodontic patients (from saliva and from a root canal) are able to prevail against salivary bacteria when grown in coculture in a biofilm reactor. METHODS: Saliva that was tested to be free of E. faecalis was used as the inoculum. The fate of E. faecalis was examined by using culture techniques and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). RESULTS: The root canal isolate accounted for 37.4% of the biofilm and 31.9% of the planktonic phase when examined by the culture technique, whereas the proportions examined by FISH showed 15.3% in the biofilm and 11.7% in the planktonic phase. The saliva isolate (as examined by the culture technique) accounted for 32.4% in the biofilm and 27.1% in the planktonic phase, respectively, compared with 14.1% in the biofilm and 9.5% in the planktonic phase when examined by FISH analysis. CONCLUSIONS: These results led to the suggestion that E. faecalis could persist in the biofilm of the human oral cavity. Because of the ubiquitous presence of E. faecalis, root canal infections may arise from different sources.
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to examine whether Enterococcus faecalis isolates from endodontic patients (from saliva and from a root canal) are able to prevail against salivary bacteria when grown in coculture in a biofilm reactor. METHODS: Saliva that was tested to be free of E. faecalis was used as the inoculum. The fate of E. faecalis was examined by using culture techniques and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). RESULTS: The root canal isolate accounted for 37.4% of the biofilm and 31.9% of the planktonic phase when examined by the culture technique, whereas the proportions examined by FISH showed 15.3% in the biofilm and 11.7% in the planktonic phase. The saliva isolate (as examined by the culture technique) accounted for 32.4% in the biofilm and 27.1% in the planktonic phase, respectively, compared with 14.1% in the biofilm and 9.5% in the planktonic phase when examined by FISH analysis. CONCLUSIONS: These results led to the suggestion that E. faecalis could persist in the biofilm of the human oral cavity. Because of the ubiquitous presence of E. faecalis, root canal infections may arise from different sources.
Authors: Alaa H A Sabrah; Ghaeth H Yassen; Wai-Ching Liu; W Scott Goebel; Richard L Gregory; Jeffrey A Platt Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2015-02-19 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Lamprini Karygianni; Margit Wiedmann-Al-Ahmad; Günter Finkenzeller; Sebastian Sauerbier; Martin Wolkewitz; Elmar Hellwig; Ali Al-Ahmad Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2011-05-17 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Kirsty M Sands; Joshua A Twigg; Michael A O Lewis; Matt P Wise; Julian R Marchesi; Ann Smith; Melanie J Wilson; David W Williams Journal: J Med Microbiol Date: 2015-12-21 Impact factor: 2.472
Authors: Annette Carola Anderson; Elmar Hellwig; Robin Vespermann; Annette Wittmer; Michael Schmid; Lamprini Karygianni; Ali Al-Ahmad Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-11-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Annette C Anderson; Daniel Jonas; Ingrid Huber; Lamprini Karygianni; Johan Wölber; Elmar Hellwig; Nicole Arweiler; Kirstin Vach; Annette Wittmer; Ali Al-Ahmad Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2016-01-11 Impact factor: 5.640