Literature DB >> 19567279

NOTES transvaginal nephrectomy: first human experience.

Jihad H Kaouk1, Wesley M White, Raj K Goel, Stacy Brethauer, Sebastien Crouzet, Raymond R Rackley, Courtenay Moore, Michael S Ingber, Georges-Pascal Haber.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To present the operative outcomes of the first natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) transvaginal nephrectomy.
METHODS: A 57-year-old woman with hypertension, right-sided flank pain, and radiographic evidence of an atrophic right kidney consented for NOTES transvaginal nephrectomy. Pneumoperitoneum was achieved with a Veress needle inserted deep in the umbilicus. Under direct vision, a colpotomy was made and a transvaginal port positioned. Using standard and articulating operating instruments inserted transvaginally, the kidney was mobilized and the renal hilum was controlled with an endovascular stapler. The kidney was placed in a laparoscopic retrieval bag and extracted through the vaginal incision. Salient demographic and operative data were obtained.
RESULTS: NOTES transvaginal nephrectomy was successfully completed, with all the operative steps performed transvaginally. Dense pelvic adhesions from a prior hysterectomy necessitated the use of a 5-mm umbilical port during vaginal port placement and for retraction of the ascending colon during division of the renal hilum. No intraoperative complications occurred. Operative time was 307 minutes, with 124 minutes dedicated to vaginal port placement and 183 minutes dedicated to adhesiolysis and nephrectomy. The duration of hospitalization was 23 hours. The visual analog pain scale score was 1 of 10 on postoperative day 2.
CONCLUSIONS: Our experience shows that NOTES transvaginal nephrectomy is technically feasible. Access to the peritoneal cavity should be performed under visual guidance and after insufflation through the umbilicus. Additional experience is needed to better define patient selection criteria and indications for NOTES transvaginal urologic surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19567279     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.03.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  24 in total

Review 1.  Pure single-port laparoscopic surgery or mix of techniques?

Authors:  Evangelos Liatsikos; Iason Kyriazis; Panagiotis Kallidonis; Minh Do; Anja Dietel; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: The transvaginal route moving forward from cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Eduardo M Targarona; Edgar Mauricio Maldonado; Jose Antonio Marzol; Franco Marinello
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-06-27

Review 3.  Transvaginal specimen removal in minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Panagiotis Kallidonis; Vasilis Panagopoulos; Iason Kyriazis; Marinos Vasilas; Evangelos Liatsikos
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-01-30       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Management of small renal masses: a review.

Authors:  Mesut Remzi; Elchin Javadli; Mehmet Ozsoy
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Pure transvesical NOTES uterine horn resection in swine as an appendectomy model.

Authors:  Chang Wook Jeong; Jong Jin Oh; Murad Abdullajanov; Jaeseung Yeon; Hahn-Ey Lee; Seong Jin Jeong; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun; Seung Bae Lee; Hyeon Hoe Kim; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES(®)): a technical review.

Authors:  Edward D Auyang; Byron F Santos; Daniel H Enter; Eric S Hungness; Nathaniel J Soper
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Reliability of gastric access closure with the self-approximating transluminal access technique (STAT) for NOTES.

Authors:  Abraham Mathew; Jonathan M Tomasko; Eric M Pauli; Matthew T Moyer; Jegan Gopal; Brooke B Ancrile; Ann M Rogers; Randy S Haluck
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Inflammatory impact of NOTES peritoneoscopy is not different from that of laparoscopy: a randomized comparative study in a survival porcine model.

Authors:  Carlos Guarner-Argente; Graciela Martínez-Pallí; Ricard Navarro-Ripoll; Henry Córdova; Mireia Beltrán; M Angels Martínez-Zamora; Jaume Comas; Cristina Rodríguez de Miguel; Antonio Rodríguez-D'Jesús; Xavier Filella; Clara Hernández-Cera; Antonio M Lacy; Christopher C Thompson; Gloria Fernández-Esparrach
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  [Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in urology: feasability of a transrectal, flexible retroperitoneoscopy in a porcine model].

Authors:  T Bschleipfer; A Hackethal; S Tacke; P Collet
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 10.  Natural orifice transluminal endoscopy surgery: A review.

Authors:  João Moreira-Pinto; Estevão Lima; Jorge Correia-Pinto; Carla Rolanda
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.