Literature DB >> 19567220

Dietary manipulation of Bos indicus x heifers during gestation affects the reproductive development of their heifer calves.

T M Sullivan1, G C Micke, R M Greer, H F Irving-Rodgers, R J Rodgers, V E A Perry.   

Abstract

The effect of nutrition during the first and second trimesters of pregnancy in composite beef heifers on reproductive parameters of their female calves was determined in the present study. At artificial insemination, heifers were assigned to one of four treatment groups (i.e. HH, HL, LowH and LL) depending on the level of crude protein intake (H = high; L = low) for first and second trimesters of pregnancy. Gonadotrophin concentrations and ovarian parameters were measured in their female calves at 5 and 23 months of age. Crude protein intake was positively associated with dam plasma urea (P < 0.001). The density of healthy follicles in heifers at the time of death was negatively correlated with dam plasma urea at Day 179 (P = 0.009). Heifers from LowH dams had a smaller-sized prepubertal largest ovarian follicle (P = 0.03) and lower densities of primordial and primary follicles (P = 0.02) and healthy antral follicles (P = 0.009) when they were killed. There was a positive correlation between plasma FSH concentrations at 5 and 23 months of age (P = 0.02), as well as between the sizes of the largest ovarian follicles at 6 and 23 months of age (P = 0.01). In conclusion, the reproductive development of heifers may be affected by prenatal nutrition during early and mid-gestation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19567220     DOI: 10.1071/RD09004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Fertil Dev        ISSN: 1031-3613            Impact factor:   2.311


  9 in total

1.  Improving smallholder cattle reproductive efficiency in Cambodia to address expanding regional beef demand.

Authors:  L Olmo; K Ashley; J R Young; S Suon; P C Thomson; P A Windsor; R D Bush
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Factors influencing establishment of the ovarian reserve and their effects on fertility.

Authors:  Danielle Monniaux
Journal:  Anim Reprod       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 1.810

Review 3.  Do in utero events contribute to current health disparities in reproductive medicine?

Authors:  May-Tal Sauerbrun-Cutler; James H Segars
Journal:  Semin Reprod Med       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 1.303

4.  Linkage of regulators of TGF-β activity in the fetal ovary to polycystic ovary syndrome.

Authors:  Nicholas Hatzirodos; Rosemary A Bayne; Helen F Irving-Rodgers; Katja Hummitzsch; Laetitia Sabatier; Sam Lee; Wendy Bonner; Mark A Gibson; William E Rainey; Bruce R Carr; Helen D Mason; Dieter P Reinhardt; Richard A Anderson; Raymond J Rodgers
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Effects of Developmental Programming Caused by Maternal Nutrient Intake on Postnatal Performance of Beef Heifers and Their Calves.

Authors:  Agustí Noya; Isabel Casasús; Javier Ferrer; Albina Sanz
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 6.  Supplementing Trace Minerals to Beef Cows during Gestation to Enhance Productive and Health Responses of the Offspring.

Authors:  Kelsey Margaret Harvey; Reinaldo Fernandes Cooke; Rodrigo da Silva Marques
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-18       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 7.  Developmental Programming of Fertility in Cattle-Is It a Cause for Concern?

Authors:  D Claire Wathes
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 3.231

8.  Gestational dietary protein is associated with sex specific decrease in blood flow, fetal heart growth and post-natal blood pressure of progeny.

Authors:  Juan H Hernandez-Medrano; Katrina J Copping; Andrew Hoare; Wendela Wapanaar; Rosalie Grivell; Tim Kuchel; Giuliana Miguel-Pacheco; I Caroline McMillen; Raymond J Rodgers; Viv E A Perry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Epigenetic marks: regulators of livestock phenotypes and conceivable sources of missing variation in livestock improvement programs.

Authors:  Eveline M Ibeagha-Awemu; Xin Zhao
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 4.599

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.