Literature DB >> 19566980

Audit of dental practice record-keeping: a PCT-coordinated clinical audit by Worcestershire dentists.

Andrew Cole1, Alan McMichael.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: A collaborative audit of clinical record-keeping standards was performed among Worcestershire dentists. AIMS: Its aims were to improve the quality of National Health Service (NHS) patient care and to assist dentists to perform well during Dental Reference Service practice visits.
METHODS: Worcestershire dentists with NHS contracts were invited to take part in this audit. Each dentist audited a random selection of 30 of their dental clinical records against a common framework comprising eight domains. Record-keeping, and the presence or absence of key diagnostic and treatment planning details were recorded. Grading was applied in four categories, in which grades 1 and 2 were good (1) and adequate (2), captured on data-collection sheets and centrally analysed for frequency of each grade.
RESULTS: Out of a total of 184 Worcestershire general dental practitioners, 161 (87.5%) submitted usable responses. The audit revealed wide variation between dentists in clinical record-keeping. The recording of soft tissues (36% below grade 2), periodontal status (30%), radiographic review (27%), and note-taking (25%) all fell below the standard that had been set (brackets show proportion not meeting the standard).
CONCLUSIONS: The results provided baseline information about the standard of record-keeping in NHS dental practices in Worcestershire. The collaborative nature of the audit enabled dissemination of individual results to participants, to facilitate comparison (anonymously) against their peers. The audit provided impetus for the Primary Care Trust (PCT) to arrange postgraduate education on record-keeping and to raise awareness among local dentists about record-keeping. The subsequent report to dentists explored the record-keeping standards expected during practice inspections undertaken by the Dental Reference Service. Worcestershire PCT's method of collaborative dental audit could potentially replace the previous national programme of dental audit, formerly coordinated locally.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19566980     DOI: 10.1308/135576109788634296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prim Dent Care        ISSN: 1355-7610


  5 in total

1.  A qualitative evaluation of foundation dentists' and training programme directors' perceptions of clinical audit in general dental practice.

Authors:  P Thornley; A Quinn; K Elley
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Maintaining dental records: Are we ready for forensic needs?

Authors:  Madhusudan Astekar; Swati Saawarn; Gayathri Ramesh; Nisheeth Saawarn
Journal:  J Forensic Dent Sci       Date:  2011-07

3.  Forensic revolution need maintenance of dental records of patients by the dentists: A descriptive study.

Authors:  Anamika Gupta; Gaurav Mishra; Hemant Bhutani; Chetan Hoshing; Ashish Bhalla
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug

Review 4.  Etiology and Measurement of Peri-Implant Crestal Bone Loss (CBL).

Authors:  Adrien Naveau; Kouhei Shinmyouzu; Colman Moore; Limor Avivi-Arber; Jesse Jokerst; Sreenivas Koka
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Quality of records keeping by undergraduate dental students in ibadan, Nigeria.

Authors:  E B Dosumu; O O Dosumu; F B Lawal
Journal:  Ann Ib Postgrad Med       Date:  2012-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.