OBJECTIVE: Fit and Strong! is an award winning, evidence-based, multiple-component physical activity/behavior change intervention. It is a group- and facility-based program that meets for 90 minutes 3 times per week for 8 weeks (24 sessions total). We originally tested Fit and Strong! using physical therapists (PTs) as instructors but have transitioned to using nationally certified exercise instructors (CEIs) as part of an effort to translate Fit and Strong! into community-based settings, and have tested the impact of this shift in instruction type on participant outcomes. METHODS: We used a 2-group design. The first 161 participants to sequentially enroll receivedinstruction from PTs. The next 190 sequential enrollees received instruction from CEIs. All participants were assessed at baseline, at the conclusion of the 8-week Fit and Strong! program, and at the 6-month followup. RESULTS: We saw no significant differences by group on outcomes at 8 weeks or 6 months. Participants in both groups improved significantly with respect to lower-extremity strength, aerobic capacity, pain, stiffness, and physical function. Significant differences favoring the PT-led classes were seen on 2 of 5 mediators, self-efficacy for exercise and barriers adherence efficacy. Participant evaluations rated both types of instruction equally highly, attendance was identical, and no untoward health events were observed or reported under either instruction mode. CONCLUSION: Outcomes under the 2 types of instruction are remarkably stable. These findings justify the use of CEIs in the future to extend the reach of the Fit and Strong! program.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Fit and Strong! is an award winning, evidence-based, multiple-component physical activity/behavior change intervention. It is a group- and facility-based program that meets for 90 minutes 3 times per week for 8 weeks (24 sessions total). We originally tested Fit and Strong! using physical therapists (PTs) as instructors but have transitioned to using nationally certified exercise instructors (CEIs) as part of an effort to translate Fit and Strong! into community-based settings, and have tested the impact of this shift in instruction type on participant outcomes. METHODS: We used a 2-group design. The first 161 participants to sequentially enroll received instruction from PTs. The next 190 sequential enrollees received instruction from CEIs. All participants were assessed at baseline, at the conclusion of the 8-week Fit and Strong! program, and at the 6-month followup. RESULTS: We saw no significant differences by group on outcomes at 8 weeks or 6 months. Participants in both groups improved significantly with respect to lower-extremity strength, aerobic capacity, pain, stiffness, and physical function. Significant differences favoring the PT-led classes were seen on 2 of 5 mediators, self-efficacy for exercise and barriers adherence efficacy. Participant evaluations rated both types of instruction equally highly, attendance was identical, and no untoward health events were observed or reported under either instruction mode. CONCLUSION: Outcomes under the 2 types of instruction are remarkably stable. These findings justify the use of CEIs in the future to extend the reach of the Fit and Strong! program.
Authors: R Altman; E Asch; D Bloch; G Bole; D Borenstein; K Brandt; W Christy; T D Cooke; R Greenwald; M Hochberg Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 1986-08
Authors: Brenda W J H Penninx; W Jack Rejeski; Jasma Pandya; Michael E Miller; Mauro Di Bari; William B Applegate; Marco Pahor Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Susan L Hughes; Rachel B Seymour; Richard T Campbell; Gail Huber; Naomi Pollak; Leena Sharma; Pankaja Desai Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2006-12
Authors: G H Guyatt; M J Sullivan; P J Thompson; E L Fallen; S O Pugsley; D W Taylor; L B Berman Journal: Can Med Assoc J Date: 1985-04-15 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Renae L Smith-Ray; Marian L Fitzgibbon; Lisa Tussing-Humphreys; Linda Schiffer; Amy Shah; Gail M Huber; Carol Braunschweig; Richard T Campbell; Susan L Hughes Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2013-12-05 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Susan L Hughes; Rachel B Seymour; Richard T Campbell; Pankaja Desai; Gail Huber; H Justina Chang Journal: Am J Health Behav Date: 2010 Nov-Dec
Authors: Kieran F Reid; Jonathan Laussen; Karan Bhatia; Davis A Englund; Dylan R Kirn; Lori Lyn Price; Todd M Manini; Christine K Liu; Christopher Kowaleski; Roger A Fielding Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2019-05-16 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Shirley M Bluethmann; Cristina Truica; Heidi D Klepin; Nancy Olsen; Christopher Sciamanna; Vernon M Chinchilli; Kathryn H Schmitz Journal: J Geriatr Oncol Date: 2021-05-26 Impact factor: 3.929