Literature DB >> 19565149

[Major depression invites major concerns].

Gordon Parker1, Heather Brotchie.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To overview limitations to the concept and construct of major depression.
METHOD: The objectives in initially conceptualizing major depression are examined against its subsequent utility and relevance to clinicians and researchers.
RESULTS: It is argued that, as defined, major depression does not differentiate clinical depression well from expressions of non-clinical depression or sadness, that its criteria set do not generate reliable diagnoses, that a diagnosis of major depression means little in and of itself (as it effectively comprises multiple types of depression) and that it fails to inform us about cause, natural history or differential treatment response.
CONCLUSION: Limitations to the concept of major depression would benefit from wider appreciation to advance changes to the clinical diagnosis of depressive sub-types.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19565149     DOI: 10.1590/s1516-44462009000500002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz J Psychiatry        ISSN: 1516-4446            Impact factor:   2.697


  1 in total

1.  Biological differences between melancholic and nonmelancholic depression subtyped by the CORE measure.

Authors:  Lucas Spanemberg; Marco Antonio Caldieraro; Edgar Arrua Vares; Bianca Wollenhaupt-Aguiar; Márcia Kauer-Sant'Anna; Sheila Yuri Kawamoto; Emily Galvão; Gordon Parker; Marcelo P Fleck
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 2.570

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.