Literature DB >> 19564423

Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comprehensive kinematic study using navigation.

Andrea Ferretti1, Edoardo Monaco, Luca Labianca, Angelo De Carli, Barbara Maestri, Fabio Conteduca.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction seems to be insufficient to control a combined rotatory load of internal and valgus torque, whereas anatomical double-bundle reconstruction might produce a better biomechanical outcome, especially during rotatory loads. HYPOTHESIS: The addition of the posterolateral bundle to the anteromedial bundle, in an in vivo double-bundle computer-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, is able to reduce the internal rotation of the tibia at different degrees of flexion. STUDY
DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study.
METHODS: Ten consecutive anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedures were performed in male patients using double-bundle gracilis and semitendinosus tendon graft with the 2.0 OrthoPilot anterior cruciate ligament navigation system. Anteroposterior displacement at 30 degrees , 60 degrees , and 90 degrees as well as internal and external rotation at 0 degrees , 15 degrees , 30 degrees , 45 degrees , 60 degrees , and 90 degrees of knee flexion were evaluated before reconstruction, after fixation of the anteromedial bundle, and then after fixation of the posterolateral bundle.
RESULTS: Fixation of the anteromedial bundle significantly (P < .05) reduced the anteroposterior displacement at 30 degrees , 60 degrees , and 90 degrees of knee flexion; the internal rotation at 15 degrees , 30 degrees , 45 degrees , and 60 degrees ; and the external rotation at 0 degrees , 30 degrees , 60 degrees , and 90 degrees . The addition of the posterolateral bundle to the anteromedial bundle did not significantly reduce internal and external rotation of the tibia at degrees of flexion measured (P > .05).
CONCLUSION: The hypothesis that the addition of the posterolateral bundle to the anteromedial bundle is able to reduce internal rotation of the tibia, minimizing the pivot-shift phenomenon, was not confirmed. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The effective role of the anatomical double-bundle procedure in better restoring knee kinematics and allowing better clinical outcomes should be questioned in an in vivo model of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using doubled semitendinosus and gracilis graft.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19564423     DOI: 10.1177/0363546509339021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  21 in total

1.  Anteromedial versus central single-bundle graft position: which anatomic graft position to choose?

Authors:  Michael B Cross; Volker Musahl; Asheesh Bedi; Padhraig O'Loughlin; Sommer Hammoud; Eduardo Suero; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Placement of femoral tunnel between the AM and PL bundles using a transtibial technique in single-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Alcindo Silva; Ricardo Sampaio; Elisabete Pinto
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  [Implant-free replacement of the anterior cruciate ligament with the double bundle technique: a modification of Pässler's operation technique].

Authors:  H Boszotta
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Single-bundle versus double-bundle ACL reconstructions in isolation and in conjunction with extra-articular iliotibial band tenodesis.

Authors:  Paul D Butler; Chloe J Mellecker; M James Rudert; John P Albright
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2013

5.  Comparison of anterior and rotatory laxity using navigation between single- and double-bundle ACL reconstruction: prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Sahnghoon Lee; Hyoungmin Kim; Jak Jang; Sang Cheol Seong; Myung Chul Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Mechanical assessment of two different methods of tripling hamstring tendons when using suspensory fixation.

Authors:  Martyn Snow; William Cheung; Jamaluddin Mahmud; Sam Evans; Catherine Holt; Bin Wang; Mahmoud Chizari
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Navigated knee kinematics after cutting of the ACL and its secondary restraint.

Authors:  E Monaco; A Ferretti; L Labianca; B Maestri; A Speranza; M J Kelly; C D'Arrigo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  A systematic review of single- versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction using the anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction scoring checklist.

Authors:  Neel Desai; Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Carola F van Eck; Volker Musahl; Freddie H Fu; Jón Karlsson; Kristian Samuelsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Experimental loss of menisci, cartilage and subchondral bone gradually increases anteroposterior knee laxity.

Authors:  Karl Wieser; Michael Betz; Mazda Farshad; Magdalena Vich; Sandro F Fucentese; Dominik C Meyer
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Anatomic double-bundle and over-the-top single-bundle with additional extra-articular tenodesis: an in vivo quantitative assessment of knee laxity in two different ACL reconstructions.

Authors:  S Zaffagnini; C Signorelli; N Lopomo; T Bonanzinga; G M Marcheggiani Muccioli; S Bignozzi; A Visani; M Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.