OBJECTIVE: Assessment of walking distance by treadmill testing is the most commonly used method to evaluate the effect of treatment in patients with peripheral arterial disease. However, treadmill testing is time consuming, relatively expensive, and does not adequately reflect real life functional ability. We hypothesized that the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) could be an alternative tool to assess objective improvement in functional walking ability of patients with intermittent claudication. METHODS: This was a validation study. It was conducted through the outpatient clinic for vascular surgery. Patients with intermittent claudication were referred for supervised exercise therapy. Treadmill testing (absolute claudication distance [ACD]), WIQ, and quality of life questionnaires (RAND-36 and EuroQol) were administered at study onset and after 3 months of supervised exercise therapy. Responsiveness was determined by mean changes in and correlation coefficients of WIQ, ACD, and quality of life questionnaires. Patients were categorized into quartiles based on the increase in ACD, which were subsequently related to change in WIQ and quality of life. RESULTS: The mean pre- and post-treatment total WIQ scores of 91 patients were 0.45 (0.22) and 0.58 (0.22), respectively. The correlation coefficient between the change in total WIQ score and ACD was 0.331 (P = .004). A 0.1 change in total WIQ score corresponded to a change of 345 meters in ACD. Analysis of the four quartiles compared to an increase in ACD showed that a greater increase in ACD corresponded with a greater increase in WIQ score, from 0.06 to 0.25 (P = .011). CONCLUSION: These data indicate that the WIQ is a valid tool to detect improvement or deterioration in the daily walking ability of patients with intermittent claudication. Hence, the WIQ can be used as an alternative to treadmill testing for objective assessment of functional walking ability, both in daily practice and in clinical trials.
OBJECTIVE: Assessment of walking distance by treadmill testing is the most commonly used method to evaluate the effect of treatment in patients with peripheral arterial disease. However, treadmill testing is time consuming, relatively expensive, and does not adequately reflect real life functional ability. We hypothesized that the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) could be an alternative tool to assess objective improvement in functional walking ability of patients with intermittent claudication. METHODS: This was a validation study. It was conducted through the outpatient clinic for vascular surgery. Patients with intermittent claudication were referred for supervised exercise therapy. Treadmill testing (absolute claudication distance [ACD]), WIQ, and quality of life questionnaires (RAND-36 and EuroQol) were administered at study onset and after 3 months of supervised exercise therapy. Responsiveness was determined by mean changes in and correlation coefficients of WIQ, ACD, and quality of life questionnaires. Patients were categorized into quartiles based on the increase in ACD, which were subsequently related to change in WIQ and quality of life. RESULTS: The mean pre- and post-treatment total WIQ scores of 91 patients were 0.45 (0.22) and 0.58 (0.22), respectively. The correlation coefficient between the change in total WIQ score and ACD was 0.331 (P = .004). A 0.1 change in total WIQ score corresponded to a change of 345 meters in ACD. Analysis of the four quartiles compared to an increase in ACD showed that a greater increase in ACD corresponded with a greater increase in WIQ score, from 0.06 to 0.25 (P = .011). CONCLUSION: These data indicate that the WIQ is a valid tool to detect improvement or deterioration in the daily walking ability of patients with intermittent claudication. Hence, the WIQ can be used as an alternative to treadmill testing for objective assessment of functional walking ability, both in daily practice and in clinical trials.
Authors: S Marlene Grenon; Christopher D Owens; Hugh Alley; Karen Chong; Priscilla K Yen; William Harris; Millie Hughes-Fulford; Michael S Conte Journal: Vasc Med Date: 2013-09-19 Impact factor: 3.239
Authors: Atul Jain; Kiang Liu; Luigi Ferrucci; Michael H Criqui; Lu Tian; Jack M Guralnik; Huimin Tao; Mary M McDermott Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Joel L Ramirez; Warren J Gasper; Sukaynah A Khetani; Greg J Zahner; Nancy K Hills; Pete T Mitchell; Brian E Sansbury; Michael S Conte; Matthew Spite; S Marlene Grenon Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2019-02-13 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Ryan J Mays; Ivan P Casserly; Wendy M Kohrt; P Michael Ho; William R Hiatt; Mark R Nehler; Judith G Regensteiner Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2011-02-18 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Atul Jain; Kiang Liu; Luigi Ferrucci; Michael H Criqui; Lu Tian; Jack M Guralnik; Huimin Tao; Mary M McDermott Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-02-28 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Guang-Ting Cong; Matthew R Cohn; Jordan C Villa; Lewis J Kerwin; Natalie Rosen; Xiu Zhen Fang; Paul J Christos; Ayelet Evrony; Jin Chen; Ashley Torres; Joseph M Lane Journal: J Orthop Trauma Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 2.512
Authors: Kevin T Nead; Margaret Zhou; Roxanne Diaz Caceres; Jeffrey W Olin; John P Cooke; Nicholas J Leeper Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2013-04-30
Authors: Emily Beth Devine; Rafael Alfonso-Cristancho; Allison Devlin; Todd C Edwards; Ellen T Farrokhi; Larry Kessler; Danielle C Lavallee; Donald L Patrick; Sean D Sullivan; Peter Tarczy-Hornoch; N David Yanez; David R Flum Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 6.437