Literature DB >> 19563900

ERP and behavioural evidence for direct suppression of unwanted memories.

Zara M Bergström1, Jan W de Fockert, Alan Richardson-Klavehn.   

Abstract

There are some past experiences that we would prefer not to remember. Previous research has shown that repeatedly stopping retrieval of an unwanted memory increases the probability of later forgetting of that memory, and engages prefrontal control mechanisms to attenuate activity in the hippocampus. However, the mechanisms of preventing memory retrieval, and how these relate to the later forgetting, are yet to be fully understood. Here we present neural and behavioural evidence that two distinct strategies for retrieval stopping - direct memory suppression and self-distracting thought substitution - contribute to forgetting of unwanted memories in qualitatively different ways. Only direct memory suppression reduced centro-parietal positivity in the event-related potentials (ERP) between 300 and 600 ms post-stimulus, consistent with a reduction in the ERP correlate of recollection. Furthermore, only direct memory suppression produced later inhibitory forgetting that was predicted by an earlier negative ERP effect that may be associated with motor inhibition. In contrast, thought substitution produced later non-inhibitory forgetting and had no effect on the ERP correlate of recollection. Our findings demonstrate the first ERP and behavioural dissociation between inhibitory and non-inhibitory forgetting, and suggest that unwanted memories may be directly suppressed without selective retrieval of alternative memories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19563900     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  37 in total

1.  Inhibition and interference in the think/no-think task.

Authors:  Mihály Racsmány; Martin A Conway; Attila Keresztes; Attila Krajcsi
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-02

2.  The relationship between thought suppression and retrieval-induced forgetting: an analysis of witness memories.

Authors:  Gennaro Pica; Antonio Pierro; Annamaria Giannini
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2014-07-27

Review 3.  A neuroanatomical model of prefrontal inhibitory modulation of memory retrieval.

Authors:  Brendan E Depue
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  Theta oscillations predict the detrimental effects of memory retrieval.

Authors:  Simon Hanslmayr; Tobias Staudigl; Alp Aslan; Karl-Heinz Bäuml
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Moderate levels of activation lead to forgetting in the think/no-think paradigm.

Authors:  Greg J Detre; Annamalai Natarajan; Samuel J Gershman; Kenneth A Norman
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Why the white bear is still there: electrophysiological evidence for ironic semantic activation during thought suppression.

Authors:  Ryan J Giuliano; Nicole Y Y Wicha
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Influence of age on the effects of lying on memory.

Authors:  Laura E Paige; Eric C Fields; Angela Gutchess
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Active suppression prevents the return of threat memory in humans.

Authors:  Ye Wang; Zijian Zhu; Jingchu Hu; Daniela Schiller; Jian Li
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-05-21

9.  Intentional suppression can lead to a reduction of memory strength: behavioral and electrophysiological findings.

Authors:  Gerd T Waldhauser; Magnus Lindgren; Mikael Johansson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-10-16

10.  Reducing future fears by suppressing the brain mechanisms underlying episodic simulation.

Authors:  Roland G Benoit; Daniel J Davies; Michael C Anderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.