Currently there is no licensed vaccine against the human pathogen Streptococcus pyogenes. The highly conserved IL-8 cleaving S. pyogenes cell envelope proteinase SpyCEP is surface expressed and is a potential vaccine candidate. A recombinant N-terminal part of SpyCEP (CEP) was expressed and purified. AntiCEP antibodies were found to neutralize the IL-8 cleaving activity of SpyCEP. CEP-immunized mice had reduced bacterial dissemination from focal S. pyogenes intramuscular infection and intranasal infection. We also identified a functional SpyCEP-homolog protease SeCEP, expressed by the equine pathogen Streptococcus equi, which was able to cleave both human and equine IL-8. CEP-immunized mice also demonstrated reduced bacterial dissemination from S. equi intramuscular infection. Therefore immunization against SpyCEP may provide protection against other streptococci species with homologous proteases.
Currently there is no licensed vaccine against the human pathogen Streptococcus pyogenes. The highly conserved IL-8 cleaving S. pyogenes cell envelope proteinase SpyCEP is surface expressed and is a potential vaccine candidate. A recombinant N-terminal part of SpyCEP (CEP) was expressed and purified. AntiCEP antibodies were found to neutralize the IL-8 cleaving activity of SpyCEP. CEP-immunized mice had reduced bacterial dissemination from focal S. pyogenesintramuscular infection and intranasal infection. We also identified a functional SpyCEP-homolog protease SeCEP, expressed by the equine pathogen Streptococcus equi, which was able to cleave both human and equineIL-8. CEP-immunized mice also demonstrated reduced bacterial dissemination from S. equi intramuscular infection. Therefore immunization against SpyCEP may provide protection against other streptococci species with homologous proteases.
Group A streptococcus (GAS) diseases are responsible for 500,000 deaths globally per year, mostly attributed to rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease, although cases of invasive GAS account for around 160,000 deaths [1]. There is currently no licensed vaccine for GAS. The surface M protein has been the main focus of GAS vaccine research and the most successful, but development has been hindered by the sheer number of different M-serotypes (>120 M-types) and cross reactivity with human proteins that may result in immune sequelae [2,3]. Current M protein-based vaccines use peptides derived from the conserved C-terminus [4,5] or multivalent peptides from the hypervariable N-terminus [6-8]. There have been many approaches to identify other suitable targets (reviewed in [9]). A whole genome bioinformatic and proteomic technique identified Spy0416 as a potential candidate, second only to M protein in conferring protection from death caused by an M23 strain [10]. Spy0416 is identical to the Streptococcus pyogenes cell envelope proteinase SpyCEP, and is responsible for cleaving and inactivating interleukin 8 (IL-8) [11]. SpyCEP is a highly conserved cell wall anchored subtilisin-like protease that is also released from the bacterial surface.In this study, the potential for SpyCEP vaccination to protect against bacterial dissemination from both an intramuscular soft tissue infection and an upper respiratory tract infection caused by a clinically relevant M81 S. pyogenes strain, was evaluated in mice.To determine whether SpyCEP represented a broad acting vaccine target we also identified functional SpyCEP homologs in the Lancefield group C strains Streptococcus equi and Streptococcus zooepidemicus. S. equi (S. equi subsp. equi) is a highly infectious equine pathogen that causes Strangles, a lymphadenitis of the head and neck resulting in abscessation and profuse nasal discharge, with occasional fatal dissemination to distant parts of the body (Bastard Strangles) [12]. Cross-protectivity of SpyCEP immunization against S. equi disease was also assessed. The work demonstrated that immunity to SpyCEP can prevent severe infection dissemination of two streptococcal species, and suggests potential for cell envelope proteases (CEPs) as vaccine candidates for all streptococcal species that express homologous proteases.
Methods
Bacterial strains
S. pyogenes strain H292 (M81) was isolated from a patient with rapidly progressive necrotizing fasciitis and bacteremia. Genome strains S. equi strain 4047 and S. zooepidemicus strain H70 were obtained from Andrew Waller (Animal Health Institute, Newmarket, UK). All streptococcal strains were cultured on Columbia horse blood agar or in Todd-Hewitt broth (THB) (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) at 37 °C, 5% CO2 without shaking. Escherichia coli were cultured in Luria-Bertani broth (Oxoid) with 50 μg/mlampicillin (Sigma–Aldrich, Dorset, UK)
Recombinant CEP protein
A portion of the SpyCEP protein (CEP) encompassing amino acid residues 35–587 of the pre-pro SpyCEP sequence (Genbank No. DQ413032) was cloned and expressed using the pET100 cloning system (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK). This sequence includes two of the three active sites. Recombinant CEP protein was then nickel-column purified according to the manufacturer's instructions (Novagen, Nottingham, UK). Recombinant CEP was tested to ensure it had no serine protease activity and was used to raise rabbit polyclonal antiCEP serum [13].
Neutralizing activity of rabbit antiCEP serum
S. pyogenesH292 cell-free supernatant was co-incubated with 5 ng/mlhumanIL-8 (R&D, Abingdon, UK) and either 50% normal rabbit serum or antiCEP rabbit serum for 16 h at 37 °C. Uncleaved IL-8 was measured by humanIL-8 duoset ELISA (R&D) (which does not detect cleaved IL-8) and IL-8 cleaving activity due to SpyCEP was calculated in comparison to the control (IL-8 in THB).
Flow cytometry
Approximately 1 × 108
S. pyogenesH292 cells were harvested from an overnight culture and fixed for two hours at room temperature in 3% paraformaldehyde. After washing twice in PBS, cells were then incubated in 50 μl normal rabbit serum or rabbit antiCEP serum, diluted 1 in 10 in PBS, for 30 min at 37 °C. Cells were then washed twice in PBS-0.1% Tween20 before incubating with 50 μl of FITC labeled goat anti-rabbitIgG (Invitrogen) diluted 1 in 200 in PBS, on ice. Flow cytometry was performed on a FACSCalibur (Becton Dickinson, Oxfordshire, UK) counting 40,000 events. Data were analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star Inc.).
Immunization challenge
Eight-ten week old female BALB/c mice (Charles River, Margate, UK) weighing 20–24 g were immunized intramuscularly with 50 μg of recombinant CEP protein emulsified 1:1 in Freund's complete adjuvant (Sigma–Aldrich, Poole, UK). Two booster immunizations were given at days 14 and 21 in Freund's incomplete adjuvant (Sigma–Aldrich). A control group of mice were immunized with PBS and adjuvant. Tail bleeds were obtained on day 20. On day 28, mice were infected with S. pyogenes strain H292 or S. equi strain 4047. All animal procedures were conducted in accordance with UK Home Office guidance and approval. For intramuscular infection, mice received ∼5 × 106
S. pyogenes and ∼5 × 107
S. equi directly into thigh muscle. For upper respiratory tract infection, mice were anaesthetized with isoflurane and ∼3 × 108CFU of S. pyogenes was allowed to be inhaled by placing 10 μl of bacterial suspension onto each nostril. After 24 h of infection, mice were euthanized and blood was taken by cardiac puncture. Spleen, liver and infected thigh muscle were excised from mice infected intramuscularly, individually weighed, and homogenized in PBS. For S. equiinfection, only spleen and thigh was taken. Lung, nose and nasal-associated lymphoid tissue (NALT) in addition to spleen and liver, were taken from mice infected intranasally and homogenized in PBS. End points for infection were bacterial dissemination to blood, spleen or liver and IL-6 levels, measured by ELISA duoset (R&D), at 24 h. Infection dissemination was determined by culturing known quantities of blood, liver and spleen. Viable CFU were measured on horse blood agar.
Western blotting of culture supernatant and cell wall fractions
Streptococcal strains were grown to early (EL, A6000.2–0.3), mid (ML, A6000.5) and late (LL, A6000.7–0.9) log phases of growth. Cell wall preparations were made using an enzymatic method described by Biswas et al. [14]. Culture supernatant and cell wall extract proteins were separated by 10% Bis-TrisSDS-PAGE gels (Invitrogen) and immunoblotted using rabbit antiCEP serum. Blots were developed using goat anti-rabbit-HRP and the ECL system (GE Healthcare, Chalfont St Giles, UK).
IL-8 cleavage SDS PAGE and immunoblotting
Cell-free bacterial culture supernatant was incubated at 37 °C overnight with 100 μg/mlhumanIL-8 (R&D) or 100 μg/mlequineIL-8 (Perbio, Northumberland, UK). IL-8 was detected by 12% Bis-TrisSDS-PAGE (Invitrogen) stained with Colloidal Blue staining kit (Invitrogen) or immunoblotted with anti-humanIL-8 HRP labeled antibody (R&D) and streptavidin (R&D).
Measurement of antibody responses to CEP
To measure murine antibody response to recombinant CEP an ELISA-based assay was employed. Plates were coated with 20 μg/mlCEP and bound mouseIgG was detected with HRP conjugated goat anti-mouseIgG.
Mass spectrometry
S. pyogenes and S. equi culture supernatants containing SpyCEP or SeCEP respectively, were concentrated by 100 kDa centrifugal filter devices (Amicon, Co Durham, UK). Chemokines humanIL-8 (R&D) and equineIL-8 (Perbio) were suspended in acetonitrile:water:formic acid (20:80:0.1) and diluted to 40 ng/μl in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate and co-incubated with 1 μl of concentrated supernatant at 37 °C for 18 h. Digested and undigested humanIL-8 and equineIL-8 were chromatographed on a C4 picofrit column (0.075 × 10 mm) (New Objective, supplied by Presearch, Basingstoke, UK) and analyzed by electrospray MS using an LTQ Iontrap MS (ThermoFisher Scientific, Hemel Hempstead, UK); other conditions were as described previously [11].
Statistical analysis
Comparative statistics were performed using non-parametric analysis with GraphPad Prism version 4.03 for Windows, GraphPad Software, San Diego California USA. Chi-squared analysis was performed where groups of 10 or more were used.
Results
Polyclonal antiCEP antibodies recognize SpyCEP and are neutralizing
Rabbit antiCEP serum was able to recognize and bind to SpyCEP expressed on the surface of whole S. pyogenesH292 cells as determined by flow cytometry (Fig. 1A). This antiCEP serum was also able to neutralize the IL-8 cleaving activity of SpyCEP present in H292 culture supernatant (Fig. 1B). This suggested that recombinant CEP protein induced antibodies with the potential to provide protection from S. pyogenesinfection.
Fig. 1
(A) Flow cytometric demonstration of rabbit antiCEP serum binding to surface SpyCEP using S. pyogenes strain H292. Cells stained with antiCEP (unshaded peaks) showed increased fluorescence compared to those stained with normal rabbit serum (shaded gray peaks) indicating binding of antiCEP antibodies to surface expressed SpyCEP. Experimental triplicates are shown. (B) Rabbit antiCEP serum neutralizes SpyCEP. Western blot for human IL-8. Culture supernatant from S. pyogenes was co-incubated with 5 ng human IL-8 in the presence of normal rabbit serum (NRS) or antiCEP rabbit serum (antiCEP). IL-8 incubated with THB alone (THB) was included as a control.
CEP immunization reduced disease severity and dissemination in intramuscular S. pyogenes infection
Mice immunized with recombinant CEP had a consistently high serum IgG response, even at 1:10,000 dilution, compared with controls (Fig. 2). Following intramuscular challenge, infection dissemination to blood, liver or spleen occurred in 8/10 control mice but only 1/10 CEP-immunized mice (χ2 = 9.899; p < 0.001). Exact bacterial counts of spleen and liver are shown in Fig. 3. Only one mouse, from the control group, was bacteremic. Bacterial load in the thigh muscle was unaffected by CEP vaccination, possibly due to the short duration of the experiment (24 h) (Controls: median 3.8 × 106 CFU/mg, range 1.0 × 106 to 1.0 × 107 CFU/mg. Immunized: median 6.8 × 106 CFU/mg, range 1.0 × 106 to 2.4 × 107 CFU/mg).
Fig. 2
Immunization of mice with CEP induces antiCEP antibodies. Serum was taken on day 20 from mice immunized with recombinant CEP (solid line, squares) or PBS (dashed line, diamonds). Serum obtained from normal unimmunized mice was also included (dotted line, triangles). CEP specific IgG was measured using an ELISA-based assay in serum diluted in PBS. Data show the mean of sera from 6 mice (±standard deviation).
Fig. 3
After challenge intramuscularly with 6 × 106 CFU/mouse of S. pyogenes, 8/10 control mice demonstrated bacterial dissemination to liver (filled circles) or spleen (open circles), while only 1/10 CEP-immunized mice demonstrated dissemination (χ2 = 9.899; p < 0.001). Exact bacterial counts per 10 mg of organ from each mouse are shown; 3 mice in the control group showed dissemination to both liver and spleen. Median is represented by a horizontal bar. N.D: not detected.
Serum IL-6, a marker of disease severity, was lower in the CEP-immunized mice (median 91.3 pg/ml, range undetectable-1263.0 pg/ml) compared to the control mice (median 314.7 pg/ml, range 9.8–776.4 pg/ml; p = 0.0433). Taken together, spread of disease and disease severity were reduced by immunity to SpyCEP in this infection model.
CEP immunization reduced dissemination in intranasal S. pyogenes infection
Following intranasal challenge, infection dissemination to blood, liver or spleen occurred in 6/8 control mice but only 2/8 CEP-immunized mice. Exact bacterial counts of spleen and liver are shown in Fig. 4. Two mice from each group were bacteremic. Although numbers in groups were small the data suggest that spread from the initial infection site was reduced by immunization with SpyCEP. Immunization with CEP did not, however, influence carriage of S. pyogenes in the nose and nasal-associated lymphoid tissue during the 24 h experiment (Table 1). Serum IL-6 was no different between CEP-immunized mice (median 311.3 pg/ml, range 57.0 pg/ml–1.4 ng/ml) and control mice (median 120.8 pg/ml, range undetectable-28.5 ng/ml).
Fig. 4
After challenge intranasally with 3.1 × 108 CFU/mouse of S. pyogenes 6/8 control mice demonstrated bacterial dissemination to liver (filled circles) or spleen (open circles), while only 2/8 CEP-immunized mice demonstrated dissemination. Exact bacterial counts per 10 mg of organ from each mouse are shown; 4 mice in the control group and 1 mouse in the immunized group showed dissemination to both liver and spleen. N = 8 per group. Median is represented by a horizontal bar. N.D: not detected.
Table 1
Bacterial CFU from lung, nose and NALT tissue following intranasal infection with S. pyogenes.
Controls
Immunized
Infected
CFUa
Infected
CFU
Lung
7/8
1.0 × 107 (2.0 × 101 to 1.9 × 107)
7/8
1.4 × 106 (0.2 × 101 to 1.5 × 107)
Nose
8/8
3.3 × 106 (1.0 × 105 to 9.5 × 106)
8/8
4.2 × 106 (6.0 × 105 to 9.8 × 106)
NALT
8/8
1.0 × 109 (5.8 × 106 to 1.7 × 1010)
7/8
3.0 × 109 (5.0 × 106 to 2.2 × 1010)
Lung and nose: CFU/10 mg, NALT: CFU/NALT.
Homologous proteases in S. equi and S. zooepidemicus
We hypothesized that vaccination against SpyCEP could also protect against other streptococcal infections. A search of other streptococcal genomes revealed that the SpyCEP gene (cepA) has many homologs in other species but particularly in the Lancefield group C species S. equi and S. zooepidemicus. S. equi (Strain 4047, Sanger Institute) cell envelope proteinase (SeCEP) and S. zooepidemicus (Strain H70, Sanger Institute) cell envelope proteinase (SzoCEP) are 98% identical to each other by BlastP analysis and are 59% identical (74% similar) to SpyCEP. SpyCEP, SeCEP and SzoCEP all encode N-terminal signal peptides (predicted by SignalP 3.0 server) from residues 1–34 and a C-terminal LPSTG cell-wall anchoring motif for secretion of the enzyme to the cell surface and attachment to the cell wall (Fig. 5). The three catalytic domains typical of cell envelope proteinase containing the active residues aspartic acid, histidine and serine, have a high degree of sequence similarity. Using rabbit antiCEP serum, SeCEP was detected in the culture supernatant and cell wall extract of S. equi (Fig. 6A). SzoCEP could not be detected in culture supernatant or cell wall extract of S. zooepidemicus despite homology to both SeCEP and SpyCEP, suggesting poor expression in this strain. SeCEP was detected throughout exponential growth as a ∼160 kDa protein which is approximately the same size as the fully processed SpyCEP. A secondary band was also detected at ∼70 kDa, not present in the SpyCEP Western blot but it is unclear what this band corresponds to. Preimmune serum blots were blank (not shown).
Fig. 5
SeCEP and SzoCEP are homologous to SpyCEP. Identical residues are shaded black and similar residues are shaded gray. Putative signal peptides span residues 1–34. At the C-terminus all three proteins encode a sortase processing LPXTG motif which precedes a hydrophobic region and a positively charged tail for cell wall anchorage. The subtilase active residues aspartic acid, histidine and serine (indicated by (*)) and surrounding residues show 81% identity.
Fig. 6
SeCEP and SzoCEP have IL-8 cleaving activity. (A) Western blot of culture supernatant or cell wall extract from S. pyogenes, S. equi and S. zooepidemicus to detect SpyCEP, SeCEP and SzoCEP respectively using antiCEP serum at different phases of growth (EL: early log, ML: mid log, LL: late log). Expression of SeCEP was similar to SpyCEP. (B) IL-8 cleaving activity of S. equi and S. zooepidemicus late log phase culture supernatant in the presence of normal rabbit serum (white bars) or rabbit antiCEP serum (black bars). Percentage of IL-8 cleaved was calculated in comparison to the IL-8 control (IL-8 incubated with THB alone). Data represent the mean of four separate experiments measured in duplicate (+standard deviation). (C) Western blot for human IL-8. Culture supernatants of S. equi or S. zooepidemicus were incubated with 5 ng of human IL-8 in the presence of normal rabbit serum (NRS) or rabbit antiCEP serum (antiCEP). IL-8 incubated in THB alone was used as a control. (D) Colloidal blue stained SDS PAGE for human IL-8 (left) or equine IL-8 (right) after incubation with culture supernatant from S. pyogenes, S. equi and S. zooepidemicus. IL-8 incubated in THB alone was used as a control.
Cleavage of humanIL-8 by SeCEP and SzoCEP was measured by ELISA which demonstrated approximately 90% degradation of IL-8 by SeCEP that could be inhibited by antiCEP serum (Mann Whitney, p = 0.0286). S. zooepidemicus demonstrated limited cleavage of IL-8 that was unaffected by the presence of antiCEP serum (Fig. 6B). Specific IL-8 degradation by SeCEP was also detected by Western blot (Fig. 6C). Both ELISA measurement of IL-8 degradation and Western blotting for IL-8 demonstrated that SeCEP could degrade humanIL-8 but SzoCEP did not. Degradation of humanIL-8 appeared to be specific (Fig. 6D); SpyCEP- and SeCEP-cleaved IL-8 had approximately the same molecular weight. In contrast, cleavage of equineIL-8 by both SeCEP and SzoCEP was observed by SDS PAGE (Fig. 6D).The site of cleavage of humanIL-8 and equineIL-8 by SeCEP was confirmed by mass spectrometry (Fig. 7). SeCEP cleaved human 1–72IL-8 (Mav, 8387.00) at the same position as SpyCEP; between 59Q and 60R to form 1–59IL-8 (Mav, 6829.0). Cleavage of equine 1–74IL-8 (Mav, 8377.49) by SeCEP occurred in the analogous position between 59Q and 60I, to form 1–59IL-8 (Mav, 6711.90). SpyCEP was also confirmed to cleave equineIL-8 in the same position.
Fig. 7
Human and equine IL-8 cleavage. Alignment and BOXSHADE of human and equine IL-8 where identical residues are shaded black and similar residues are shaded gray. The point of cleavage of both IL-8 molecules by SpyCEP and SeCEP is indicated by a vertical arrow.
Immunization with recombinant CEP prevents dissemination of S. equi infection
Following intramuscular challenge with S. equi dissemination to spleen occurred in 10/10 control mice but only 6/10 immunized mice (χ2 = 5.0; p = 0.0127). Immunized mice had an average of 100-fold less S. equi load in the spleen than control mice (Mann Whitney, p < 0.0001) (Fig. 8). S. equi numbers in the thigh were unaffected by CEP vaccination (Controls: median 7 × 107, range (4.2–9.2) × 107, Immunized: median 6.3 × 107, range (2.6–9.2) × 107). Serum IL-6 did not reflect the reduced bacterial load and remained similar between the two groups (Controls: median 515.7 pg/ml, range 177.6–1794 pg/ml, Immunized: median 552.3 pg/ml, range 153.6–1528 pg/ml).
Fig. 8
After challenge intramuscularly with 5 × 107 CFU/mouse of S. equi strain 4047 10/10 control mice demonstrated bacterial dissemination to liver (filled circles) or spleen (open circles), while only 6/10 CEP-immunized mice demonstrated dissemination (χ2 = 5.0; p = 0.0127). Exact bacterial counts per 10 mg of organ from each mouse are shown. Control mice also had higher bacterial counts in the spleen than the immunized group (Mann Whitney, p < 0.0001). N = 10 per group. Median is represented by a horizontal bar. N.D: not detected.
Discussion
SpyCEP is the S. pyogenes cell envelope proteinase that is able to cleave and inactivate IL-8 and other CXC chemokines [11,15]. The surface location of SpyCEP and the high degree of conservation between isolates [15,16] makes it an ideal vaccine target. Indeed a whole genome proteomic and bioinformatic study identified SpyCEP (Spy0416) as a potential protective target promoting survival from an intranasal M23 infection, second only to M protein [10]. Studies in mice have demonstrated that SpyCEP plays an important role in disease [13,17] suggesting that neutralization of SpyCEP would be detrimental to the pathogen, although other studies could not confirm this [15,18]. In these preliminary studies we have demonstrated that immunization against SpyCEP induces neutralizing immunity and appears to prevent dissemination of disease from the site of infection. This was true for infection with S. pyogenes and S. equi.Despite a global need, there is currently no licensed vaccine for GAS. The highly abundant surface M protein has been the most promising target but there have been problems associated with it. There are over 120 different M-types based on the N-terminal hypervariable region; antibodies directed to this region are opsonising but type specific [19]. Other regions of M protein generate antibodies that either are not opsonising or demonstrate cross reactivity with host tissue that may result in post streptococcal immune sequelae. SpyCEP does not demonstrate any sequence based serotype specificity and, although absolute levels of expression may vary, all clinical strains tested demonstrated SpyCEP activity that could be inhibited by antiCEP antibodies [16]. It seems likely that SpyCEP would be immunogenic in humans, since neutralizing antibodies to the protease are generated by natural infection, being found in pooled human intravenous immunoglobulin [Turner et al., unpublished].We expressed and purified a 552aa portion of the SpyCEP protein spanning residues 35–587aa which begins immediately after the signal peptide and includes two of three catalytic domains. This recombinant protein (CEP) was administered intramuscularly, emulsified in adjuvant, and produced high systemic SpyCEP immunity. Immunization with CEP resulted in reduced dissemination of disease both from an intramuscular soft tissue infection and an intranasal upper respiratory infection. Clearance from the initial site of infection was not affected by vaccination although the study was designed to assess the effect on invasive disease and therefore the infection course was necessarily short. Full evaluation of CEP as a vaccine for S. pyogenespharyngitis and carriage will require testing in an appropriate model of pharyngeal/tonsillar carriage.S. equi and S. zooepidemicus both encode SpyCEP homologs that in this work have been shown to be functional homologs. S. zooepidemicus (S. equi subsp. zooepidemicus) is a mucosal opportunistic pathogen of a number of animals. Rarely it can also cause severe infections in humans such as bacteremia, meningitis and nephritis [20,21]. Despite carrying the gene for SzoCEP, protein expression and humanIL-8 degrading activity was not detected in this strain. Cleavage of equineIL-8 was, however, detected suggesting that expression of SzoCEP is low in this strain. In contrast, SeCEP produced by S. equi was highly expressed throughout exponential growth both at the cell surface and released into the culture supernatant in a similar manner to SpyCEP produced by S. pyogenes. SeCEP cleaved both humanIL-8 and equineIL-8 and cleavage of humanIL-8 was inhibited by antiCEP serum confirming SeCEP specific proteolysis. The comparable expression pattern and function of SeCEP to SpyCEP suggested that the role of SeCEP in infection may be similar to SpyCEP, although the disease Strangles is more suppurative than that seen in clinical S. pyogenes disease. Immunization of mice with CEP reduced disease dissemination of S. equi from an intramuscular soft tissue infection. Although it did not completely inhibit infection dissemination, the disease produced by S. equi was more severe in mice than that caused by S. pyogenes. Strangles is predominantly a disease of the equine upper respiratory tract and lymph node system hence a full evaluation of CEP as a vaccine is required in an equine setting using intranasal administration.
Authors: Annelies S Zinkernagel; Anjuli M Timmer; Morgan A Pence; Jeffrey B Locke; John T Buchanan; Claire E Turner; Inbal Mishalian; Shiranee Sriskandan; Emanuel Hanski; Victor Nizet Journal: Cell Host Microbe Date: 2008-08-14 Impact factor: 21.023
Authors: Paul Sumby; Shizhen Zhang; Adeline R Whitney; Fabiana Falugi; Guido Grandi; Edward A Graviss; Frank R Deleo; James M Musser Journal: Infect Immun Date: 2008-01-03 Impact factor: 3.441
Authors: Karen L Kotloff; Mary Corretti; Kathleen Palmer; James D Campbell; Mark A Reddish; Mary C Hu; Steven S Wasserman; James B Dale Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-08-11 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Stephen B Beres; Ricardo Sesso; Sergio Wyton L Pinto; Nancy P Hoe; Stephen F Porcella; Frank R Deleo; James M Musser Journal: PLoS One Date: 2008-08-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Samuel A Shelburne; Randall J Olsen; Bryce Suber; Pranoti Sahasrabhojane; Paul Sumby; Richard G Brennan; James M Musser Journal: PLoS Pathog Date: 2010-03-19 Impact factor: 6.823
Authors: Prathiba Kurupati; Claire E Turner; Ioanna Tziona; Richard A Lawrenson; Faraz M Alam; Mahrokh Nohadani; Gordon W Stamp; Annelies S Zinkernagel; Victor Nizet; Robert J Edwards; Shiranee Sriskandan Journal: Mol Microbiol Date: 2010-02-10 Impact factor: 3.501
Authors: Mark J Walker; Timothy C Barnett; Jason D McArthur; Jason N Cole; Christine M Gillen; Anna Henningham; K S Sriprakash; Martina L Sanderson-Smith; Victor Nizet Journal: Clin Microbiol Rev Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 26.132
Authors: Mengyao Liu; Hui Zhu; Jinquan Li; Cristiana C Garcia; Wenchao Feng; Liliya N Kirpotina; Jonathan Hilmer; Luciana P Tavares; Arthur W Layton; Mark T Quinn; Brian Bothner; Mauro M Teixeira; Benfang Lei Journal: PLoS Pathog Date: 2012-04-05 Impact factor: 6.823
Authors: Anna Henningham; Daniel J Ericsson; Karla Langer; Lachlan W Casey; Blagojce Jovcevski; G Singh Chhatwal; J Andrew Aquilina; Michael R Batzloff; Bostjan Kobe; Mark J Walker Journal: mBio Date: 2013-08-06 Impact factor: 7.867